• Reed Smith is live in the forum now
    AMA Live now
    Graduate Recruitment and SQE interns from Reed Smith are here to answer your questions.
    Join the live thread →
  • Willkie Live: How to Write a Successful Vacation Scheme Application
    7 Oct 2025 5:30pm (UK) Zoom (registration required)
    Learn exactly how to write a successful application to Willkie Farr & Gallagher, with live examples + Q&A with Gemma Baker.
    Register on Zoom →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
144
124
Hi everyone,

With the qualifier "Is this law-related work experience?", do we feel this only covers experience specifically within a law firm? I'm a career changer, and have client-side legal experience from dealing with matters, and have also worked in legal recruitment.

In addition, where do people mention Forage? I'm currently in a job and didn't really feel it fits under "work experience", but often there is no logical space to add it, unless it specifically asks if you completed one of our Forage tasks.

Thanks!
Hello!

That's a really good question. I would say that "law-related work experience" is usually interpreted quite broadly - it doesn't have to be limited to time spent in a law firm. Client-side legal work, where you've had exposure to legal issues or worked with lawyers, definitely counts. Legal recruitment can also be framed as law-related, especially if it gave you insight into how firms operate, the skills they value, and the industry as a whole. The key is showing how those experiences have developed skills or understanding that are relevant to a legal career.

In relation to Forage, if there wasn't a specific space dedicated to Forage tasks, I usually placed mine in the work experience section. If you have done a few, it might be handy to group them together so that they take up less space in the section - but I think either way would be perfectly fine!

I hope that helps :)
 

GT1205H

Active Member
Premium Member
Aug 2, 2025
13
18
Hi everyone,

With the qualifier "Is this law-related work experience?", do we feel this only covers experience specifically within a law firm? I'm a career changer, and have client-side legal experience from dealing with matters, and have also worked in legal recruitment.

In addition, where do people mention Forage? I'm currently in a job and didn't really feel it fits under "work experience", but often there is no logical space to add it, unless it specifically asks if you completed one of our Forage tasks.

Thanks!
Hi, I have to disagree with the other member that said they are not proper work experience. During events and fairs I have spoken to multiple firms’ recruiters (S&M, HL, Linklaters, A&O to name a few) and asked them about Forage.

They absolutely love it and value it, to quote a recruiter from Linklaters “of course we want to hear about, they take 4-5 hours to complete so of course they are valuable, but specially what you learn from it”.

So my understanding is the value depends on what you actually got from it, was it legal concepts? Was it a practice area? Did you learn about the role of a trainee? The firms work?

I would advise that if you have a many of those (not from the firm) maybe put together 2-3 in one single entry (highlighting what you got). If you have done the firms programme then I would recommend making it an entry and talked about what you got from it and at the end you can mention briefly others that you have completed if different in content from the firm’s one.
 
  • 🤝
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
144
124
any advice for technical case studies?
Hey!

For technical case studies, I have previously found that a good approach is to break them down into different steps:
  1. Understand the problem clearly - take a moment to restate the brief in your own words and identify what the key issue or objective is. This shows that you're thinking critically and not jumping straight into a solution. I always found that when I ensured that I understood the actual issue being discussed, I found it easier to then tackle the solutions and consequences and discuss this with the interviewers (if applicable).
  2. Structure your answer - I would use a simple framework (e.g. outline the problem, explore possible solutions, weigh the pros / cons, and then recommend a solution based on that balance). Even if your solution isn't perfect, if you show your thought process through a clear structure, this demonstrates strong reasoning.
  3. Talk through your thought process - similar to the above, interviewers often case more about how you think rather than whether you get the "right" answer. I would be transparent about any assumptions that you are making, and flag where you would need to find out more information before making a definitive answer.

It can also help to practice a few examples in advance, so that you get comfortable explaining your reasoning aloud. There are some great resources available on TCLA that I utilised when preparing for case studies (these can be found in the TCLA Wiki, which has a ton of other handy threads):

I hope that helps - best of luck, you've got this!
 
  • 🏆
Reactions: floral.tcla

floral.tcla

Valued Member
Premium Member
Aug 15, 2024
124
156
Hey!

For technical case studies, I have previously found that a good approach is to break them down into different steps:
  1. Understand the problem clearly - take a moment to restate the brief in your own words and identify what the key issue or objective is. This shows that you're thinking critically and not jumping straight into a solution. I always found that when I ensured that I understood the actual issue being discussed, I found it easier to then tackle the solutions and consequences and discuss this with the interviewers (if applicable).
  2. Structure your answer - I would use a simple framework (e.g. outline the problem, explore possible solutions, weigh the pros / cons, and then recommend a solution based on that balance). Even if your solution isn't perfect, if you show your thought process through a clear structure, this demonstrates strong reasoning.
  3. Talk through your thought process - similar to the above, interviewers often case more about how you think rather than whether you get the "right" answer. I would be transparent about any assumptions that you are making, and flag where you would need to find out more information before making a definitive answer.

It can also help to practice a few examples in advance, so that you get comfortable explaining your reasoning aloud. There are some great resources available on TCLA that I utilised when preparing for case studies (these can be found in the TCLA Wiki, which has a ton of other handy threads):

I hope that helps - best of luck, you've got this!
Thank you so much Abbie!
 
  • 🤝
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

lawstudent2

Esteemed Member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Dec 9, 2024
94
76
How long have people had to wait to receive an email confirmation from hogan lovells after completing the second sjt?
Mine crashed halfway and I had to refresh it and I thought it was fine as at the end it said assessment completed and submitted, however, its been 5 hours and no confirmation email has arrived so I am a bit worried now.
 

Amgrad

New Member
Oct 2, 2025
3
6
Hello!

Whilst I can’t confirm whether they will sponsor visas for vacation schemes this cycle, it is always worth emailing the graduate recruitment team to double-check, especially if you have a strong application ready to submit. There’s still a while until the application deadline, so there should be plenty of time for them to reply and I’m sure they’d be more than happy to confirm for you :)

I’m sorry to hear that your last AC felt isolating - being the only one attending virtually must’ve been tough, but it’s super impressive that you made it that far!

Whatever you decide, wishing you the best of luck. You’ve got this!
Thank you! White & Case has confirmed they won't sponsor visa for WVS this year, still waiting for Hogan Lovells to respond.
 
  • 🤝
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Newsletter

Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.