• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
986
1,132
Hello, does anyone have any tips for Latham & Watkins VI?

Thank you :)
Hello!

Congratulations on reaching the VI stage for Latham & Watkins!

I haven't completed a VI with Latham & Watkins specifically, but for video interviews generally, it helps to think of them as a mix of motivational, competency, and situational questions. Common questions that you could be asked are: why you're interested in the firm, what your personal strengths and weaknesses are, and how you've demonstrated relevant skills (e.g. teamwork, resilience, or problem-solving). I would have a think about your answers for some of the more common questions, but don't stress about trying to prepare for every question imaginable - it's impossible to predict everything! Making sure that you have a good understanding of your motivations and can reflect on your own experiences goes a long way!

For video interviews in particular, structure is really important - using the STAR method can help keep your answers focused and prevents rambling (which I used to be guilty of!). It also really helped me to practice in advance, particularly making sure that you are speaking clearly and at a steady pace - don't be afraid to pause briefly to think before answering. I can totally understand how awkward video interviews can feel, but making sure that you are looking at the camera and treating it like you would a normal interview is really important.

It is also worth brushing up on a few recent commercial or legal developments that interest you so that you can demonstrate commercial awareness if prompted, particularly with the firm's key practice areas / sectors. I would try to show genuine enthusiasm and authenticity - this can feel tricky over VI, but they're assessing how you communicate and whether you'd be a good fit for their culture, so it's important that you are yourself!

I've linked the TCLA Wiki page on video interviews - there are a couple of resources here that might be useful to have a read over before your VI.

Good luck with the interview! :)
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
1,032
1,816
@Abbie Whitlock @ZNadeem
Hi, does anyone know how long is the cover letter supposed to be for Sullivan & Cromwell? Would 1.5 pages be fine?
I would avoid personally writing a 1.5 pages long cover letter. I have generally heard from recruiters that they prefer either a 1 full page cover letter or a 2 full pages cover letter; but that candidates should only go for the latter option if they have enough substantive content to justify the length while also observing the normal application writing standards of being very concise and to the point.
 

flower1

Valued Member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 18, 2023
101
76
Hello!

Congratulations on reaching the VI stage for Latham & Watkins!

I haven't completed a VI with Latham & Watkins specifically, but for video interviews generally, it helps to think of them as a mix of motivational, competency, and situational questions. Common questions that you could be asked are: why you're interested in the firm, what your personal strengths and weaknesses are, and how you've demonstrated relevant skills (e.g. teamwork, resilience, or problem-solving). I would have a think about your answers for some of the more common questions, but don't stress about trying to prepare for every question imaginable - it's impossible to predict everything! Making sure that you have a good understanding of your motivations and can reflect on your own experiences goes a long way!

For video interviews in particular, structure is really important - using the STAR method can help keep your answers focused and prevents rambling (which I used to be guilty of!). It also really helped me to practice in advance, particularly making sure that you are speaking clearly and at a steady pace - don't be afraid to pause briefly to think before answering. I can totally understand how awkward video interviews can feel, but making sure that you are looking at the camera and treating it like you would a normal interview is really important.

It is also worth brushing up on a few recent commercial or legal developments that interest you so that you can demonstrate commercial awareness if prompted, particularly with the firm's key practice areas / sectors. I would try to show genuine enthusiasm and authenticity - this can feel tricky over VI, but they're assessing how you communicate and whether you'd be a good fit for their culture, so it's important that you are yourself!

I've linked the TCLA Wiki page on video interviews - there are a couple of resources here that might be useful to have a read over before your VI.

Good luck with the interview! :)
Hi Abbie, thank you for your reply, it's extremely useful. I haven't reached the VI stage, but was just wondering in advance as I always struggle with VIs. Thank you for your answer :)
 
  • 🤝
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

abc124

Legendary Member
Aug 9, 2025
225
203
From what I know Covington is not generally seen as one of the very grade-focused firms (such as the likes of Slaughter and May and Cleary Gottlieb), so I think your application will be considered even if you do not have an overall "high" 2.1 grade. That said, on their website the firm does specify that they are looking for candidates who have a "strong academic record" - which I interpret as a preference for candidates who have achieved 2.1 grades consistently in their modules (although not necessarily in every single one).
Thanks a lot, that’s good to hear!
 

nbjani

Valued Member
Nov 23, 2023
104
216
Welp, that was two Amberjack tests this weekend which went terribly. I just can't figure out how to answer those questions. It's really frustrating because there's no way a human would rank me as having low 'grit' or 'applied intellect' when taking time to speak to me about my work experiences. Do we know if firms (Reed Smith, Mayer Brown) look at the assessment/VI holistically, or do you think terrible scores on the SJT are likely to filter me out? For both my verbal and numerical were great, and I think the VI went well - especially for Reed Smith, which is where I had the worst scores in the SJT. But I'd rather just know if there's no point holding out hope.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

Unknowncabbage

Legendary Member
May 18, 2024
133
182
Welp, that was two Cappfinity tests this weekend which went terribly. I just can't figure out how to answer those questions. It's really frustrating because there's no way a human would rank me as having low 'grit' or 'applied intellect' when taking time to speak to me about my work experiences. Do we know if firms (Reed Smith, Mayer Brown) look at the assessment/VI holistically, or do you think terrible scores on the SJT are likely to filter me out? For both my verbal and numerical were great, and I think the VI went well - especially for Reed Smith, which is where I had the worst scores in the SJT. But I'd rather just know if there's no point holding out hope.
I am pretty sure MB posted something on their instagram story in a Q&A saying that they look at the whole application holistically, and look for an overall good performance. Not sure about Reed Smith though.
 

s123

Star Member
Jan 18, 2024
31
40
Welp, that was two Cappfinity tests this weekend which went terribly. I just can't figure out how to answer those questions. It's really frustrating because there's no way a human would rank me as having low 'grit' or 'applied intellect' when taking time to speak to me about my work experiences. Do we know if firms (Reed Smith, Mayer Brown) look at the assessment/VI holistically, or do you think terrible scores on the SJT are likely to filter me out? For both my verbal and numerical were great, and I think the VI went well - especially for Reed Smith, which is where I had the worst scores in the SJT. But I'd rather just know if there's no point holding out hope.
No same my scores were so bad for Reed smith I feel like this is such a universal experience
 

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
986
1,132
Welp, that was two Cappfinity tests this weekend which went terribly. I just can't figure out how to answer those questions. It's really frustrating because there's no way a human would rank me as having low 'grit' or 'applied intellect' when taking time to speak to me about my work experiences. Do we know if firms (Reed Smith, Mayer Brown) look at the assessment/VI holistically, or do you think terrible scores on the SJT are likely to filter me out? For both my verbal and numerical were great, and I think the VI went well - especially for Reed Smith, which is where I had the worst scores in the SJT. But I'd rather just know if there's no point holding out hope.
Hi!

I totally understand how you feel - the SJTs can be super frustrating and don't always reflect how you actually work or think in real situations.

From what I've seen, firms such as Reed Smith and Mayer Brown tend to look at the process holistically rather than rejecting people just for lower SJT scores. The VI will carry real weight, especially if your verbal and numerical went well too! For my Reed Smith SJT, I scored 6766, mid verbal intellectual and high numerical intellect.

Cappfinity scoring can feel a bit unpredictable, so try not to read too much into one section. You've still got a chance - and it sounds like you performed strongly, so don't give up hope yet! :)
 

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
986
1,132
Hi everyone. I have a quarter final interview for the aspiring solicitors competition this week. Does anyone have any tips on how to prepare for it? And if anyone has already done it, how did you find it?
Hey!

I haven't previously competed in the Aspiring Solicitors competition, however, I did compete in BIUCAC last year so I have included some of my general tips for preparing for commercial awareness competitions below. Some of the advice relates to later stages in the competition, but I hope they assist! Best of luck with the quarter final interview :)

Know your content inside and out

Don’t just memorise terms or concepts - make sure you truly understand them and how they apply to law firms and businesses. Read the news daily in whatever format suits you best (for me, this was a mix of the Financial Times, LittleLaw, and BBC News). Highlight any sectors or topics you’re particularly unsure about and read about them in detail in advance. Before the competition, ensure you can confidently explain key concepts and how they would apply to a business setting, as they may ask you follow-up questions. It might be worth having your friends quiz you!

Master the basics

A strong grasp of the fundamentals is essential. I found it helpful to use Investopedia and the Finimize glossary to review terms I wasn’t confident in. Whenever I came across an unfamiliar word, I’d note it down and revisit it later to make sure it stuck. Focus on understanding core concepts such as bonds, equity, securitisation, and derivatives - and keep an eye on topical versions of these (for example, green bonds came up in BIUCAC!).

Understand law firms as businesses

Commercial awareness in the legal context isn’t just about knowing the news - it’s about understanding how law firms operate and how they bring value to clients. I’d make sure you understand:
  • How law firms make money and attract clients, and
  • The business climate and challenges faced by their clients

When reading a commercial news story, I always found it helpful to think about where a law firm might be instructed and which practice areas would be involved. This dual perspective shows that you understand both the legal and commercial dimensions.

Stay up to date

Make sure you are engaging with the news regularly - ideally daily. If reading articles isn’t your style, you could try podcasts such as FT News Briefing, BBC Business Daily, or Watson’s Daily for quick, accessible updates. You don’t need to know everything, but aim for a broad understanding across industries (unless you are told the focus in advance).

Have a go

If you’re unsure about a question, don’t panic - give it a go! It’s better to say something like “I’m not entirely sure, but here’s how I’d approach it…” and then explain your reasoning and thought process. This shows confidence and analytical thinking, which is often valued quite highly.

Additionally, if an assessor challenges your opinion, don’t immediately change your mind. Talk them through your thought process and how you arrived at your conclusion, and if they do bring up a point you had not considered, be open to altering your answer then.

Analyse articles and sectors effectively

If you’re given an article or sector in advance, ask yourself:
  • Why is this happening?
  • Why does it matter?
  • What does this mean for law firms and their clients?
Look into the key opportunities and challenges in the given sector, and consider how law firms might help clients navigate them. Think about how law firms add value - for instance, through advising on regulatory change, managing risk, or facilitating deals.

Group Tasks

If you are assigned a group task, I would remember that often they are not only assessing your legal knowledge, but also how you work with others. It can feel very tempting in such a high-pressure environment to speak as much as you can; however, I would aim to be neither the quietest nor the loudest in the room! Try to build on your teammates' ideas and encourage them to share their opinions on topics you have brought up. I would also try to summarise ideas as you go along, which shows that you are listening and can help track progress.

One thing that especially helped when I was competing was to play to each team member's strengths. For example, we had to complete a negotiation, and this involved drafting the heads of terms and negotiating them with another team. As a team, we divided this up to our strengths - for example, I led the drafting, one team member led the research, and the other team member had experience negotiating, so he gave us advice on best practices. This was the best use of our time, and it meant that every team member was contributing in some way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaysen

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.