Thank you! I did the test on November 25thcongratulations! when did you do the test?
Thank you! I did the test on November 25thcongratulations! when did you do the test?
You can and definitely should keep some things similar, particularly main themes and motivations. Since you have previously progressed, graduate recruiters will likely expect less in terms of how much you will have changed your answers. That said, I would highly encourage you to at least change some things, even if it is only a change in terms of how you structure an answer and how you formulate a given substantive point - you want to avoid similarity checkers showing your answers as nearly identical to last year, as this is generally not a good look ( some recruiters say they interpret this as you not having enough motivation to try to seek to improve).Thank you so much Andrei for your advice. I am a little reluctant to change it majorly as I did pass the first stage so in this would you recommend keeping some things similar? Many Thanks
I do not think this is a major enough issue to warrant emailing the graduate recruitment team about it directly; instead, I would advise you to update it in the Additional Information section. That will show attention to detail and will also dispel and potential doubts that may have arisen in the future as to whether this was a genuine oversight or a dishonest one.@Andrei Radu @Abbie Whitlock Accidentally listed my attendance at Skadden's October Open Day as a November Open Day. Although there was also a November Open Day (which I attended) but the October Open Day was selective/competitive. So it's not necessarily false info, just sort of omitting the info(?). Should I email Grad Rec regarding this (or add it as part of 'Additional Information' on All Hires)?
Thank you so much @Andrei Radu @wooliewoo !Hi @pfoapplicant just to add to the great response from @wooliewoo I wanted say that based on the firm's prompt, you can definitely include a wide range of experiences that go beyond contract-based roles that would formally be classified as "work experiences". That said, as I see it, if you have attended many commercial law-related events, you should not make a separate entry for each of them and provide a detailed description. Instead, I would advise you to have one big "Careers events" entry, where you list the events you attended and also explain how these events/any particularly impactful event shaped your motivations. If you have completed multiple virtual experiences or short volunteering activities (or, really, any less substantial experiences that can be easily grouped together based on a set of common features), I would advise the same thing (although, of course, you can also draw connections to skills/abilities they've helped you develop).
As for your more general worry on including too many or two few of your experiences: I think you want to find a right balance and not overwhelm recruiters with dozens of long entries, but, at the same time, you want to add as much value to your application as possible by including many experiences that formed relevant skills. Sometimes, it is true that "less is more" in that if you have way too many long entries, your most impressive and substantive experiences may make less of an impact on a recruiter than they could have had if they had not been drowned in a sea of other information. As such, I would advise you not to feel like you have to include everything and anything that could possibly go in. That said, generally, people err more often by being under-inclusive rather than over-inclusive, and recruiters constantly try to emphasise that a very wide range of experiences can be included in the work experience section.
As such, I would say that as long as you do not have more than 7-8 entries, you should not worry about this issue; while if you have 8+ lengthier ones, you should start considering the overall value add of each new entry vs the cost of adding more information for a recruiter to get through.
9 days for meHow long did it take to hear from FF after the stage 1 test?
Not 1,2,3,1Anyone know the minimum benchmark for NRFs arctic test?
Did you pass the the wg or pfo for wg test.Just received a PFO from CC post WG...
I didn't take the test, but someone here said it's 12/16 who progressed to VIAnyone know the minimum benchmark for NRFs arctic test?
Did you receive your feedback report. Also did you check your junk emails and your portal. I know a few friends who did not receive a feedback report but still got TI invites.I did the WG for DLA Piper a couple weeks ago even though I thought I did fairly well, didn't receive any "consideration" email like I've seen on the forum. Should I count this a PFO?
Received this like three times nowIs there anyone that didn't receive the email from DLA "we're writing to confirm that your application is now under consideration for the next stage of our recruitment process: the first stage interview", that still got a TI? Still confused on how they send out emails, feeling like it's a PFO.
Passed the WGDid you pass the the wg or pfo for wg test.
I got thru the first stage interview in oct for spring , as far as I know Acs are in Jan/FebErrr anyone still waiting for BCLP spring vac scheme reply after doing their first test ?
Watson Glaser legal para style basedHi! Have you completed it? Was wondering what it is like?