• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

quick question how are people's links WG scores looking? I have got the best score I have ever got with them but i got fairly mid in the evaluating arguments section whereas i normally perform the highest in that section. for context the first time i ever took WG i got 1 percentile LMAO and i got 80 on my most recent.

Currently on hold at 70% which means nothing tbh just patiently waiting
Hey, how do you see your links wg score? Was this for their vac scheme ?
 
quick question how are people's links WG scores looking? I have got the best score I have ever got with them but i got fairly mid in the evaluating arguments section whereas i normally perform the highest in that section. for context the first time i ever took WG i got 1 percentile LMAO and i got 80 on my most recent.

Currently on hold at 70% which means nothing tbh just patiently waiting
Assuming it's Linklaters, I only got 92 percentile, which I'm not sure if it's enough to progress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trophy
What should we expect, look out for during written exercises on M&A? What are key issues to flag and more minor details? Any tips on answering these questions?
Hi,

My main tip on answering written exercises is to write very clearly and concisely. You want the person reading it to see that you have well-formulated and structured arguments. This is incredibly important because the knowledge aspect can be fixed, but the way you think can show a real insight into the way you approach problems. I would typically try and bring out three points/issues and discuss these in three separate paragraphs.

For me, the main issues to flag are typically surrounding warranties and indemnities. There are normally litigation issues or some reason why it is risky for a seller to acquire the business. Therefore, I would really emphasise preparing what warranties and indemnities are and how they can be used to help negotiate an M&A deal. For example, an indemnity can be used to promise the buyer compensation for a litigation case. Indemnities and warranties are negotiated in the Share Purchase Agreement (the SPA).

I would also know the difference between share sales and asset sales and what differences these can have on a deal. For example, for a share sale, the buyer has to take on the risks of the company but for an asset sale, the buyer only has to take on the risks associated with that asset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alphabravocharlie
If it's alright, I've got a few questions about the Reed Smith process? I've been observing for a little haha, but this is my first post here so please let me know if this should be in a different thread.

Has anyone heard back from Reed Smith after SJT/VI? I have applied for the winter scheme and I would've thought ACs would take place before Christmas?

Further to that, roughly how many people make it through to AC? How many vac scheme offers are made? What is success rate from a vac scheme? I've been told before it's roughly 50% through to blended assessment but I'm not sure if that's accurate? Also how many places are actually available on each scheme, as there is conflicting information on different websites.

Sorry for the barrage of questions, Reed Smith is by far my top choice firm, but I wasn't able to attend any open days to ask my questions. Any advice would be much appreciated!!! @Abbie Whitlock @RikPalmer-ReedSmith @ReedSmithBecca
Hi, yes, sure, I'll answer in bullet points below!:
- You wouldn't have been able to apply exclusively to the Winter Scheme, as it's one application to be considered for either scheme. We have been inviting candidates through the Assessment Centre already, but do have places remaining on the Winter Scheme, and candidates who successfully reach an early-mid Jan AC will still be considered for this.
We aim to respond to candidates within 1 month of completing the SJT/VI and have largely been doing this.
- We can't give specific information on this, but have approximately 15 places on each scheme. This varies each year as we don't have a strict number of AC or VS places, we progress people based on reaching an expected score.
 
Assuming it's Linklaters, I only got 92 percentile, which I'm not sure if it's enough to progress.
yes Linklaters, 92 is a amazing score. I do believe that the capp test is held in higher regard than the WG as this is retaken if successful to the AC. Someone a while back got 99 percentile and was unsuccessful so as long as your capp assessment was good you'll be good :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheLegalEdit
quick question how are people's links WG scores looking? I have got the best score I have ever got with them but i got fairly mid in the evaluating arguments section whereas i normally perform the highest in that section. for context the first time i ever took WG i got 1 percentile LMAO and i got 80 on my most recent.

Currently on hold at 70% which means nothing tbh just patiently waiting
Honestly it’s really depends on your Capp test. They look at it together, you can pass the WG and not Capp and so you won’t progress if that happens.
 
How would you go about answering why transactional law and not investment banking?
Hi,

I was asked this in my final TC interview and the first thing I acknowledged was the overlap between transactional law and investment banking.

I then went on to discuss three reasons why I was drawn to commercial law. I discussed the team/client relationship within law firms and the value I place on such relationships. I also discussed the analysis, problem solving and skills required in transaction law, relating some experience to this (which at the time was a Vacation Scheme experience but could be any relevant experience). I then also discussed the role that a transactional lawyer takes in a deal and directly compared this with an investment banker's role, and highlighted why this was more attractive to me.

Hope this helps!
 
Are people like heavily practising for the WG? I've just been winging it after reading about how it works, there's no where near enough time to practice it extensively, apply and be prepared for my degree work!
I never practice hence why i got 1 percentile on my first go haha but the more i did the better i got. My biggest strength is the assumptions but I'm not terrible at conclusions either as I'm always jumping to conclusions myself
 
quick question how are people's links WG scores looking? I have got the best score I have ever got with them but i got fairly mid in the evaluating arguments section whereas i normally perform the highest in that section. for context the first time i ever took WG i got 1 percentile LMAO and i got 80 on my most recent.

Currently on hold at 70% which means nothing tbh just patiently waiting
I’m at the same exact situation as you! Same percentile and everything I think haha
 
  • Love
Reactions: Trophy
Are people like heavily practising for the WG? I've just been winging it after reading about how it works, there's no where near enough time to practice it extensively, apply and be prepared for my degree work!
Personally, I try and use a "little and often" approach - I cba sitting through an entire practice test every day, so instead I'll get gpt to give me a couple section specific questions (eg inference, assumptions) and just do a few of those whenever im bored. IMO consistency is the best thing for improving test scores, WG or otherwise 🫡
 
  • Like
Reactions: Madison Pinewall
Hi guys please can I have some honest ideas of what you think is going wrong here because I’m getting constant rejections. I’m on my second application cycle, this time taking a far more tailored approach and only applying to firms I’ve interacted with and been to open days at. All of my applications are proofread by people that have secured TCs and I’ve read lots of successful cover letters so I know I’m along the right lines. I have top grades, study at Cambridge, hold society positions, have work experience law and non-law - please help 😓 I think I’m being filtered out by these assessments but I’ve been practising them loads :(
I'm gonna pm you!
 
Personally, I try and use a "little and often" approach - I cba sitting through an entire practice test every day, so instead I'll get gpt to give me a couple section specific questions (eg inference, assumptions) and just do a few of those whenever im bored. IMO consistency is the best thing for improving test scores, WG or otherwise 🫡
This is a good idea. I mean, it's a bit late... I've done a fair few tests for firms. I got to the job sim for hogan and passed the benchmark for HSF Kramer but I'm not sure how indicative this is. Do they continue to look at scores throughout ? Is there cut off quite low ?
 
  • 🤝
Reactions: Sharkfin
This is a good idea. I mean, it's a bit late... I've done a fair few tests for firms. I got to the job sim for hogan and passed the benchmark for HSF Kramer but I'm not sure how indicative this is. Do they continue to look at scores throughout ? Is there cut off quite low ?
Purely speculative but I imagine they only matter in getting to the next stage like an AC. Following that, I can't imagine they're relied upon throughout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Madison Pinewall
I completed the Ashurst online test today but I have not received an email confirmation that I have completed the test. Also, I pressed on the like again and it allows to register and do the test again even though I have already completed it.

Have others got an email confirmation when they have completed the test?
 
Interesting... Then app questions weren't a particularly high decisive factor, I reckon? I am a coach for one competition, and whenever we assemble a new team, I put their motivational answers into an AI detector before making a final decision. If it's 20%, then I let it go, of course, but if it's 80-90%...

P.S. I am not against AI, but how you use it demonstrates intelligence, in my view
I read an article about AI detector and it turns out can't fully differentiate the human factor. Nowadays LLM is smart, if you prompted them to humanise the respond and specifically elaborate how is your writing style, lexical resources level, use of contractions, emdash, etc that's absurd to identify. Just like weeks ago, I shared how I worked with LLM consultants.

So, many colleges or grad employer in the US never checked applicants writing through AI detector. The UK and EU might be slightly reluctant against AI, what I've seen Sweden is the most progressive memberstate in terms of AI policy, even taught students how to use it properly.

Whereas in Asia, AI is viewed as a productivity tool rather than a part of society's philosophical life. Many businesses laid off because of AI, yet they're struggle to maintain revenue and efficiency like western counterpart because of this false thought of perception.
 
Last edited:

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.