I emailed them myself. This is the email verbatim: "We can confirm receipt of your completed online immersive assessment. We are currently still processing your assessment and will be in touch with an update in the new year."Was that a universal holding email or did you email them? Thanks!
Mysterious firm... Seems interesting though! Thinking of spending a couple of hours on the app just in caseI was just about to ask about applying to Katten. I have started my app but I’m not an international but wanted to hear if anyone has had an AC in prior years
I did not get this emailHey I just got an email from Early Careers saying that they are currently processing my online assessment and will give me an update next year. As you said you completed it on the same day as I did, you'll probably hear back then aswell
i did a simmons ac over a month ago and radio silence lmao i managed to do another ac and the vac scheme itself in the time i’ve been waitingOh boy let me tell you about simmons...its been 48 days
Yes, im counting because im petty![]()
I did not get this email![]()
I emailed them myself. This is the email verbatim: "We can confirm receipt of your completed online immersive assessment. We are currently still processing your assessment and will be in touch with an update in the new year."
Use some of that creative force and come up with an answer.I got 22/36 in Weil, with 7 in grit, 3 in Applied Intellect, 6 in both Creative force and digital mindset, bad?
This is very true! Sometimes, the rejection is simply the result of a highly competitive process - where most candidates were good but they still only have 25 TC's on offer. It's funny because we tell ourselves the rejection itself is so bad without considering the fact that there is so much behind it that we don't know. We assume that we're not good enough because we applied to the same firm two cycles in a row and think that's it, but we never consider the the potential behind how close we may have been this time around. The truth is, with each rejection, there is always little success candidates never get to see e.g. the first time you applied you were ranked 98/600 applicants and they could only shortlist 50, and the second time you applied you were ranked 57/2000 and they could only shortlist 50 - candidates just see the rejection, but we can see your improvements. This is why, you should never give up, tomorrow you may be 12/2000 and they're still shortlisting 50!Honestly, at the end of the day, no one really knows why anyone gets rejected at any stage except for the specific person/people who make the final decision to reject at that stage i.e. Grad Rec/Partners depending on the stage (as far as I'm aware)
Pleasure to make your acquaintance Lord Sumption.@Afraz Akhtar @Abbie Whitlock
What are the most effective questions to ask partners at the end of a training contract interview? Which ones have you found work well?
Nothing is a copout if you explain it well. AI is a good start, however do you think there's a risk of others choosing the same topic? If so, do you think you're able to write a strong enough answer to set yourself apart from theirs? It's a little risky - you want to stand out, not blend in. So, I personally would not choose AI as a topic. Instead, think beyond disruption to the wider industry and something specific to the firm itself, its particular industries/key clients/something they've been doing well. Everytime I was faced with this question, I always considered their annual report first to read through any of its successes, weaknesses, areas of focus for the foreseeable and used that as a base to identify potential risks.I'm writing an answer to Akin's commercial issue question they ask to outline how it would impact clients and the type of work the firm does, would it be a cop out to use AI as an example?
@Afraz Akhtar
Thanks so so much it means a lot!!Congratulations!!!
Rooting for you, May this go well![]()
Thank you!Nothing is a copout if you explain it well. AI is a good start, however do you think there's a risk of others choosing the same topic? If so, do you think you're able to write a strong enough answer to set yourself apart from theirs? It's a little risky - you want to stand out, not blend in. So, I personally would not choose AI as a topic. Instead, think beyond disruption to the wider industry and something specific to the firm itself, its particular industries/key clients/something they've been doing well. Everytime I was faced with this question, I always considered their annual report first to read through any of its successes, weaknesses, areas of focus for the foreseeable and used that as a base to identify potential risks.