They set out at the London AC that they're working through the regional offices in the new yearManchester
They set out at the London AC that they're working through the regional offices in the new yearManchester
Ah thank you, I've seen loads of people get on to stage 2 so I was getting worried!'Anything' as in no confirmation?
They've likely received a bulk of their applications on deadline day and the GR team is only three people so it may be a while. Also it's 3 days before Christmas, so you may not hear back till after Christmas.
I wouldn't worry, they are likely slammed.
No worries. also if it provides any relief, I completed my chat based interview November 17th and I didn't hear back about stage 2 just over a month later.Ah thank you, I've seen loads of people get on to stage 2 so I was getting worried!
preachJust want to contribute to the ongoing disagreement. Mitigating circumstances can often be real evidence as to a candidates overall potential, and can evidence that they are capable of more than they achieved. Academics are an incredibly poor metric of success in the legal world. Law firms use academic results as a filter because it can broadly be representative, increasingly those that have stricter academic requirements use it because they need to find a way to cope with the number of applicants. 2:1 across the board is harsh yes, but GR are very aware that a single 2:2 in your first year is very different to graduating with a high 2:1.
To say that low(er) paying firms attract a different standard of candidate would be categorically untrue. The legal industry generally is very competitive, and high quality candidates can be found everywhere thanks to everyones very different aspirations. Furthermore, a fellow applicant telling you whether your application is competitive or not comes with a hefty grain of salt. No one, aside from GR and those experienced in legal recruiting, can actually tell you if you truly are a competitive applicant or not because it is weighed against the pool of other applicants. Not meeting a strict grade requirement (stricter than is industry standard) categorically does not extinguish you from success at other firms.
Owing someones lack of success to their "lack of DEI or mitigating circumstances" is a great way to pigeon hole yourself into hating the system and not focusing on how you can improve your own standing as an applicant. Especially if your advice is "don't apply because you don't have XYZ". It reduces fellow applicants down to try and make yourself feel better. If you yourself don't feel confident in your application because you have a conceited and "world is against me" mentality does not mean you should push that onto other people. We have no idea the circumstances, challenges and adversity faced by anyone else and pushing a negative mentality doesn't help anyone.
ONLY AN HR AND 45....ikr it took me like an hour & 45
not rolling, I applied on the day of the deadline for the spring vac scheme, and now received a Video interviewProbably very late but is baker mckenzie rolling?
did it ask to access ur camera..i was shirtless by mistake during an amberjack (during the sjt portion but webcam on & full frontal) 😭 do i skip the whole test & vi or perhaps will it not flag... i can't believe i'm asking this
Congrats!!! When did you complete the test?Kennedys Video Interview invite!
I would be very grateful for any tips/what to expect from someone who has progressed w them earlier![]()
Thank you! Thursday!Congrats!!! When did you complete the test?
im sry this is so funny😭i was shirtless by mistake during an amberjack (during the sjt portion but webcam on & full frontal) 😭 do i skip the whole test & vi or perhaps will it not flag... i can't believe i'm asking this
LMAOO during mishcons chat interview i was literally listening to christmas music AND singing along for 3 hrs💀hope they dont mind😝Omg bye if they actually watch us when we're doing the tests I actually will cry. I talk to myself the whole time they probably think I'm crazy
Ooh now u do have a point hereIt’s interesting if you consider the influence on M&A activity