• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Looking for a bit of advice, would appreciate anything.

I think I’m genuinely considering calling it a day regarding TC’s:

Last year, I managed to make it to 2 ACs, with the more recent of the two being a huge positive for me. Though I didn’t get an offer, I received positive feedback and fell just short, and it was a significant improvement on the first AC. It’s also worth mentioning this was for a firm with a notoriously challenging AC, which I further took as a positive.

This was around August, so it gave me good motivation to hit the ground running with this cycle. By this point, I knew what I was doing, I’d perfected my strategy when it came to SJT’s, Watson Glasers, so I felt good going into this cycle…

Only to quickly realise that most firms decided this year they want to throw a massive spanner in the works and make their processes 40x harder. Before this, I knew VIs were not my strength, so I thought I’ll just avoid firms that use them, considering I knew I was now strong in written applications and psychometrics. Now, it seems that VIs are an unavoidable fact of TC applications as of this year.

Still, I went into WVS applications quite optimistic. Fast forward to now, received rejections from every single winter I applied to, which was demoralising but I knew it was still early days.

Again, fast forward to now, I’m genuinely considering just saving my time and investing it elsewhere, starting to believe the odds are far too stacked against me.

I’ve completed about 10 VIs for firms this year already, with a good portion of those being selective, so again I know my applications are pristine and my psychometrics are too, but I’ve been rejected from all. I’ve had 1 to 1s with various people to help me improve VI performance, who all said that I was seemingly quite good with them.

I was going into this cycle with AC experience from two elite City Firms and so I naturally felt pretty confident in my abilities, but this year feels regressive if anything at this moment in time. Now I just think it’s ultimately impossible to even get an AC, especially with this cycle quietly coming to the end in a month or so, at least for vacs. I’m now a graduate and so I really cannot afford to keep investing my time into what seems to be a black hole, having told myself I’m going to give it my best shot this year and leave no stone unturned.

And in my opinion - and it could sound convenient - I think the way firms are heading with these new recruitment processes is ultimately starting to diminish the merit that used to be involved in writing an impressive application. Though I know endurance is very important in this process too, it does feel like unless the quality you input is matched with an exhausting amount of stamina, people who were strong contenders in ACs and vacs are now not even being shown the time of day.

But that’s just my opinion. Let me know what you think, thanks.
Sorry to hear this, and you’re right the process is exhausting. There’s definitely a lot of mental hurdles to jump through before you start your TC, whether that’s applications, assessments, SQE exams - it’s a career choice that requires a lot of investment - but It’s only going to be made worse by placing more pressure on yourself to secure one sooner now that you’ve graduated.

I know you’ve probably heard it before but there is no set age or time to secure a TC. I’ll be starting mine at 28 and honestly, I’m happier for it. I got the chance to experience so many careers (relevant) but exciting nonetheless that have since shaped what I actually want to do post qualification. So the added time, you never know, it may actually work in your favour as you move through your seats in comparison to those with limited experience.

Dont give up! If you feel like the VIs are bringing you down and you’ve practised for them as much you can, perhaps this cycle has just seen a lot more improvement for everyone. So it’s not something lacking in you but rather it being so close again.
 
I wonder if their poor grad team are trying to get back to everyone by tomorrow!
This is the grad rec team at Reed Smith trying to get through all of our apps by 23:59 tonight:

Computer Working GIF
 
Last edited:
I’m working on my Cooley app atm and one of the app questions is as follows:

We are all ‘work in progress’ and need to celebrate our strengths but also focus on our areas for growth. Please tell us about you (strengths and areas for growth). (300 words)

What does this even mean lmao. Questions like this one rly confuse me so much ngl.

Does anyone have any advice or insight into how this kind of question ought to be tackled?​
 
I’m working on my Cooley app atm and one of the app questions is as follows:

We are all ‘work in progress’ and need to celebrate our strengths but also focus on our areas for growth. Please tell us about you (strengths and areas for growth). (300 words)

What does this even mean lmao. Questions like this one rly confuse me so much ngl.

Does anyone have any advice or insight into how this kind of question ought to be tackled?​
probably like 2 strengths/skills that you developed + 1 weakness that you dont (and shouldnt) call a weakness (prlly make sure it's not instrumental to the role like communication/responsiveness or something of that sort). id probably go a step ahead and explain what i'm doing now to develop in my area for growth
 
I’m working on my Cooley app atm and one of the app questions is as follows:

We are all ‘work in progress’ and need to celebrate our strengths but also focus on our areas for growth. Please tell us about you (strengths and areas for growth). (300 words)

What does this even mean lmao. Questions like this one rly confuse me so much ngl.

Does anyone have any advice or insight into how this kind of question ought to be tackled?​
Talk about your strengths and how you developed them and are continuously developing them and for the weakness bit, just choose one weakness and the key thing is you mention how you are overcoming that weakness and how you’ve been working on it, what steps have you taken to overcome and work on it. I remember, I had answered this question in an interview, and said networking and said that I had come from a different country, imposter syndrome, then spoke about how important networking is in any profession especially legal so I did a lot of open days, part time roles at university which required client contact though out my degree. They were happy with my answer. Essentially I feel they want to see your approach here.

Edit - another point I was advised by an associate was that don’t say things like “I work too hard so I burn out” kind of weakness because they understand what you’re trying to do and it will back fire🤣
 
Last edited:
If grad rec said they'd get back to me 'by Christmas' post-AC but they still haven't (the AC was a month ago), is it worth emailing them? @Abbie Whitlock @Andrei Radu I would appreciate any advice!
I think it is fine to email them once their self-imposed reply deadline has passed, in the sense that such a query is not likely to be looked negatively upon. That said, I would advise you not to do this before at least another week or so has passed. This is because graduate recruiters frequently end up needing a few extra days to get back to people, and Christmas is a particularly busy time of the year (if not the busiest) for most law firms - both in terms of their general workload and in terms of managing the recruitment cycle.
 
I’m working on my Cooley app atm and one of the app questions is as follows:

We are all ‘work in progress’ and need to celebrate our strengths but also focus on our areas for growth. Please tell us about you (strengths and areas for growth). (300 words)

What does this even mean lmao. Questions like this one rly confuse me so much ngl.

Does anyone have any advice or insight into how this kind of question ought to be tackled?​
Hi!

Totally valid to be confused - I always used to think these kinds of questions are designed to trip you up!

What the graduate recruitment team are usually ask is whether you're self-aware and open to growth, rather than whether you're perfect. I'd try to think of it as a short reflective piece where you discuss your strengths and weaknesses.

I would approach it by:
  • Pick 1-2 strengths that are relevant to working in commercial law as a trainee solicitor (e.g. teamwork, communication, attention detail, resilience, etc).
  • Give a brief example of each of these strengths in action - just to root your answer in real-life examples
  • Choose 1 or 2 areas for growth, but crucially explain what you're doing to improve - that is the part they care about most!
  • End by showing how this growth mindset will make you a better trainee (e.g. you could mention that a training contract involves continuous learning, etc.)
I would avoid cliches, and try to think about the areas that you genuinely wish to become better at. When answering this in my applications, I would discuss my fear of public speaking and how I wasn't confident in this area. However, I could then go on to discuss how I was signing myself up for more opportunities to practice this (e.g. BIUCAC) as I knew it was an essential element of being a trainee / commercial lawyer!

In short, they just want to see that you are self-aware and capable of growing throughout your training contract.

I hope that assists, and best of luck with the Cooley application! :)
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.