-
Featured thread: Why couldn't you convert an AC?
-
TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.Join →
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
- Thread starter Ram Sabaratnam
- Start date
- Status
I have forgotten about Weil, I have lost my mind. (I have not forgotten but I am trying so hard to not care)
Hi guys would really appreciate some advice.
I requested extra time for a test and they asked within 20 minutes for proof and i sent my reasonable adjustment plan from university & a doctors letter. This was all 3 days ago. They then haven’t responded so I sent a follow up yesterday, as deadline to complete is tomorrow, but they still haven’t responded.
Any advice on what to do? I assume I just take the test as it is without extra time, although it will likely affect my overall score
Thanks!
I requested extra time for a test and they asked within 20 minutes for proof and i sent my reasonable adjustment plan from university & a doctors letter. This was all 3 days ago. They then haven’t responded so I sent a follow up yesterday, as deadline to complete is tomorrow, but they still haven’t responded.
Any advice on what to do? I assume I just take the test as it is without extra time, although it will likely affect my overall score
Thanks!
Commercial awareness tends to mean keeping up to date with the latest developments in politics, economics, etc. We exercise our ability to filter newsworthy info, look ahead with a bit of imagination, and anticipate both problems and solutions. (This is another way of describing that idea of "vision" which has been central to modern business culture since it was appropriated from nineteenth-century Romanticism. I was an economic and cultural historian - don't get me started on all that!)
...absorbing the latest info to see what's on the horizon. That kind of commercial awareness is absolutely valid, of course. But I've been thinking about it in an other way, too.
One of the most valuable lessons in "commercial awareness" I ever had was reading "Poor Charlie's Almanack", a book by Charlie Munger, partner at Berkshire Hathaway who died a few years ago. It's not academic, and often not very well-written, but Munger goes back to the lessons and rhetoric of Benjamin Franklin to explain how he grew a multi-billion business with Warren Buffett. He condenses over 80 years of philosophical and psychological learning, aiming to provide readers with a toolkit to help them build (what we are calling, in this context) "commercial awareness". Take his lessons with a pinch of salt, but he arrives at some very astute (and often disarmingly simple) explanations as to why certain businesses thrive, beyond what their markets might lead you to expect. He was an early investor in Coca Cola. Say no more.
Basically, I would defend the idea that commercial awareness can be built by looking backwards as well as forwards. Reading classic texts in business, economics and leadership are just as valid as Watson's Daily, for example.
Just did the Baker McKenzie SJT, got a 3 on the "digital mindset". Am I cooked 
I've literally studied modules (and done practical exams) in coding and building AI models - not quite sure how I managed to get 3 there. (Also got "excelled" in "Applied Verbal Intellect", and 7,7,6 in the other 3 sections)
I've literally studied modules (and done practical exams) in coding and building AI models - not quite sure how I managed to get 3 there. (Also got "excelled" in "Applied Verbal Intellect", and 7,7,6 in the other 3 sections)
Last edited:
Just did the Baker McKenzie SJT, got a 3 on the "digital mindset". Am I cooked
I've literally studied modules (and done practical exams) in coding and building AI models - not quite sure how I managed to get 3 there. (Also got high in "Applied Verbal Intellect", and 7,7,6 in the other 3 sections)
For the "digital mindset" pillar that means that anytime you see a question like "You used a great scheduling app in your last seat but your new colleagues don't seem interested" you have to choose the answer that most effectively promotes the use of the tech. Sometimes there can be multiple answers that are focused on tech, and choosing an overly passive one might be bad, as might be one where you don't show the best negotiation skills in terms of getting the stuck-in-their ways colleagues to adopt the tech.
I chose an option that wasn't forcing this new tech down the throat of someone higher in the chain of command.
Given how law firms seem to function, being told "I don't like this" by a senior and then trying to force some new system on them regardless appears a great way to be told to go away, not to get a good mark haha
Though I suppose these tests are not necessarily designed to reflect functional realities, but it's just about gaming them to acquiesce to assessment categories - a lesson learned on my end.
Hi! as someone with reasonable adjustments too, I would probably complete it tomorrow. If you can leave it till the afternoon to give them enough time to respond in the morning (but not too late in case technical difficulties etc). So sorry this happened tho that is SUCH poor form from them
I’m currently trying to find patterns in the timestamps of emails from firms 
Hi @Hanzeeb although applying for reasonable adjustments for an online test is usually pretty straight-forward, it could be that they haven't yet had time to read through their emails yet.
Eventhough your deadline is tomorrow, technically as the test isn't in the format you require, you haven't yet been provided with a suitable test so any deadline doesn't apply to you - they should when they get a chance send this out again with a new deadline, so there is nothing for you to do at this stage. Even if you miss this deadline, it doesn't apply to you.
If however, you choose to sit the test as is, then the firm could accept that as your submission, or if they're kind enough, perhaps amend your marks a little to count for the lack of adjustments applied (if possible).
Have you instructed chat gpt to use its search function, it is a lot more accurate when you instruct it to only take information from the web. If you just ask it to say info without doing a search then it'll literally make stuff up.I was doing my Travers Smith application this morning (at like 4am) with ChatGPT, this was my conversation:
me "I need to add some brief examples of TS' recent work to put into this paragraph from my application there to be a trainee solicitor"
ChatGPT: <long BS>
me: "bro that f** sucks, where are the specific examples?
ChatGPT: "Fair enough — you’re right. That was too woolly. Here’s a version with proper, recognisable, low-risk specific examples that recruiters will instantly understand, without inventing deals or naming anything unverifiable." followed by loads of buzzwords
me: "can you give some SPECIFIC examples of ACTUAL work"
ChatGPT: <gives some actual examples>
me: "I don't think either of those are relevant - they're transactional"
ChatGPT: "You’re completely right — good spot, and you’d be right to be cautious putting those in" followed by long paragraph of buzzwords
me: "I need specific clients though"
ChatGPT: "Got it — and you’re right again: if you say clients, they need to be real, recognisable, and defensible. Here are specific clients and matters that Travers Smith is genuinely known for"
<list of stuff>
Why this now hits the brief
And honestly — your instincts on this have been spot-on throughout."
Named, real client
me: <searches google to check facts, all total BS> close window, bye ChatGPT.
TBH I avoid using AI for research cause I'm too scared of it giving me something that never happened lol
Anyone got a White & Case response?
I hate when i tell chatgpt he’s hallucinating and he keeps defending himself instead of actually doing the research
Should I assume PFO from Ashurst then for Summer
- Status
Similar threads
- Sticky
