TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi @Abbie Whitlock , I was wondering if you had any advice on answering situational questions in interviews (e.g. "Imagine xyz happened, how would you react"). Is there a structure I could follow or any tips to keep in mind? Thanks so much :)
Hello!

For situational questions, I'd say that the graduate recruitment team (or the interviewers) are usually looking at how you think, rather than a "perfect" answer - this means that a light structure can really help keep you focused!

In the past, I have approached it through:
  • Start by showing you understand the situation and any competing pressures (e.g. clients, deadlines, risk, etc.).
  • Then talk the interviewers through how you would prioritise and respond in practice - this could involve gathering the relevant facts, checking any guidance, and communicating with people where needed. It also helps to explain why you're taking those steps, as this helps the interviewers understand your thought process.

Some more general tips:
  • Try not to rush into a solution (and I have been guilty of this in the past!) - it's absolutely okay to pause and think out loud, and talk the interviewers through the steps that you might consider
  • Acknowledge any uncertainty or where you would require additional information - you could show that you would ask questions or seek support from others where appropriate
  • Link your response to the firm's values - this helps to tailor and personalise your answer to this specific firm
If you can, you could also reference a previous experience that you have had where you did something similar (e.g. "I've faced something similar in X, so I'd approach it by..."). This can help make your answer feel more authentic - however, it is not necessary, and I would avoid trying to force a link!

I hope that assists, and best of luck :)
 
@Andrei Radu @Abbie Whitlock Hi I haven't heard back from GD at ALL since my application + automatic test. Would you recommend emailing them? I applied 18 Dec.
Hey!

I'd say it's fine to send a polite email if you are worried, but they may be working their way through applications in batches - I'm sure you'll hear back soon! :)
 
The WBD SJT email says it takes 5 minutes to complete?? Does anyone have an insight on this?
I’m in a VS WhatsApp group and someone said this:

“If it’s like the neurosight I’ve done before it was like a sentence appears on screen like what’s most important to you/would you rather type quick Qs and there’s four answers to choose from, you hover on one of them and it submits straight away to next Q to try catch ur first instinct”
 
  • ℹ️
Reactions: SubpoenaColada
what kinds of questions can you prepare to ask at the end of an interview if you don't know who your interviewers will be until the actual thing?
Hi!

The main advice I was given in relation to this is to ask questions that you can't find from the firm's website or promotional materials - this could be topics such as:
  • Training and Development: how trainees are supported day-to-day, how feedback is given, or what tends to differentiate trainees who really excel at the firm
  • Firm Culture: collaboration between teams, the level of responsibility given to trainees, or how people are supported during busy periods
  • Forward-Looking: what challenges and opportunities the firm is anticipating in the next few years and how trainees might be exposed to those.

I also found it helps to ask a few more personal questions to the interviewers, even if you don't know who they will be before the actual interview. This could be things such as "What have you personally enjoyed most about working at the firm?" or "What draw you to the firm?".

I'd also remain flexible - if you prepare questions in advance but have questions come to mind during the actual interview, it's better to tailor them slightly to the interviewer. This will show genuine engagement with them, and show a real interest!

Best of luck! :)
 
anyone ever email grad recruitment about being unavailable for an AC date? Im currently enrolled in a course which is quite strict on tutorial attendance and the AC would clash with 2 classes.
Hello!

I was in a similar(ish) situation last cycle with my Reed Smith AC, as the only available dates I could see were during a vacation scheme I was on. I would definitely email the firm to explain that you are unavailable on that AC date, and politely ask if there are any other available dates - some firms release them in batches, so you may be able to wait to book an AC in a later batch :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: T. Rainee
Personally, I feel all tests except WGT are BS. Not like any applicant answers all questions with complete honesty😭
I mean any sort of critical thinking, numerical reasoning, deductive reasoning, error checking tests etc are pretty objective.
If I were running a recruitment process for example, I'd have an application form with 0 questions.
Automatically allocated test (based on grade requirements) with WG+ deductive reasoning + numerical reasoning.
Automatic timed long answer question test based on passing benchmark - I'd have 4 questions randomly allocated from a question bank of 40 questions (10 questions per type). I'd publish all questions online so that nobody would have an unfair advantage from communicating with people who took the test.
Then AC.

Of course, no process can be completely objective, but I still think SJTs are a non-evidence based way to thin out applicants. (Of course, you could argue that people who practice and research SJTs deserve to do better on average, and to an extent I agree)
 
I mean any sort of critical thinking, numerical reasoning, deductive reasoning, error checking tests etc are pretty objective.
If I were running a recruitment process for example, I'd have an application form with 0 questions.
Automatically allocated test (based on grade requirements) with WG+ deductive reasoning + numerical reasoning.
Automatic timed long answer question test based on passing benchmark - I'd have 4 questions randomly allocated from a question bank of 40 questions (10 questions per type). I'd publish all questions online so that nobody would have an unfair advantage from communicating with people who took the test.
Then AC.

Of course, no process can be completely objective, but I still think SJTs are a non-evidence based way to thin out applicants. (Of course, you could argue that people who practice and research SJTs deserve to do better on average, and to an extent I agree)
WGT is ironically not a test of critical thinking lol. I actually think if you critically think too hard the answers become unclear but someone who thinks in a surface level manner will just select the right choice, although they admittedly are the winners here. On the job, I bet it becomes far less clear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.