Hey!
For this type of written task, I would say that the focus should be on structure and prioritisation rather than perfect legal knowledge. Therefore, I'd focus on the following areas:
- Start with a clear stance / position: state your conclusion or recommendation upfront so that the assessor knows exactly what you are arguing (almost like an executive summary)
- Use a logical structure: there isn't necessarily a strict one you have to follow, but I would briefly set out the facts, identify the key issues, and then deal with each point in turn - just make sure to explain why each point supports your argument. It might help to utilise headings for your answer.
- Be selective and prioritise: you might not have time to cover absolutely everything, so I would pick the strongest points and develop them properly, rather than listing lots of weaker ones in less depth.
- Acknowledge counterarguments: as you would in a university essay, I would briefly acknowledge them to show judgment and balance, especially if you then explain why they don't outweigh your conclusion (i.e. why your argument is stronger)
- Write clearly and commercially: you should aim to be concise and clear - try not to waffle (easier said than done, I know!) and try to keep the client's objectives in mind when you are answering.
I hope that assists, and best of luck!
)
)
