Feel like it’s a pfo atp hahaanyone else just been ghosted by ashurstlike cmon i wanna know if i can book my overtime
(edit: iirc the email said we would hear back by 27/02... the dreaded pfo day is getting closer...)
They'll wait until the 27th to give us a PFOanyone else just been ghosted by ashurstlike cmon i wanna know if i can book my overtime
(edit: iirc the email said we would hear back by 27/02... the dreaded pfo day is getting closer...)
Hi! Would anyone like to exchange insights about the Cleary Gottlieb AC or Jones Day AC? I'm happy to help with Dechert (WE, AC, VS), Weil VI, Freshfields Stage 2, Hogan Lovells Stage 2, Mayer Brown VI, as well as insights from Weil Open Day, King and Spalding Open Day, Hogan Lovells Open Day, Skadden Open Day etc.
it will forever be a mystery to me why firms do not reject applicants when they know they will not accept themyes but I don't think they send the WG in batches....![]()
give it a go, don't let that affect your mindset going into the AC. If IM didn't think you were capable enough for the TC they wouldn't have given you the AC, good luck!IM AC tomorrow, pretty much all hires on my stream at my location have been previous paralegals at the company. So not feeling ideal, but will give it a go regardless.
3 variables that would probably inform the decision:Maybe this is not the best place to ask but I’m still quite new to everything on here.
If you got a vac scheme with a huge international firm known everywhere with 40+ offices across the world and let’s say you were successful and got a TC for 2027 or 2028. ( literally me manifesting rn lmfao)
Or you had offered straight away a TC to start 2026 with a independent law firm ( let’s say 100 people) that has just one office domestic work but also advises a lot of international companies within that area. You’re happy with the sectors and the salary.
What would you pick?
Would you wait. But if you said no to the independent law firm maybe then there’s the risk of not being successful at the vac scheme for the other firm so you’d chase 2 rabbits but get none…….
Curious what people will think of this WG question, I don't understand why the answer is Strong Argument here. The initial statement simply mentions having a "uniform dress code" - the argument at hand implies that a uniform dress code cannot be relaxed and comfortable for a dress policy, which is why I picked Weak Argument first: it'd be weak argumentation to assume that a uniform dress policy is immediately unrelaxed and uncomfortable, it is just uniform aka similar among all workers. Or "relaxed" in this context means leaving it up to the individual instead of enforcing a uniform rule?Think the trick here is to consider the argument as true and then take productivity as the main deciding factor for this.View attachment 7948Curious what people will think of this WG question, I don't understand why the answer is Strong Argument here. The initial statement simply mentions having a "uniform dress code" - the argument at hand implies that a uniform dress code cannot be relaxed and comfortable for a dress policy, which is why I picked Weak Argument first: it'd be weak argumentation to assume that a uniform dress policy is immediately unrelaxed and uncomfortable, it is just uniform aka similar among all workers. Or "relaxed" in this context means leaving it up to the individual instead of enforcing a uniform rule?
I think you're reading too much into it. Assume the argument is true. Then think, is the argument important and relevant?View attachment 7948Curious what people will think of this WG question, I don't understand why the answer is Strong Argument here. The initial statement simply mentions having a "uniform dress code" - the argument at hand implies that a uniform dress code cannot be relaxed and comfortable for a dress policy, which is why I picked Weak Argument first: it'd be weak argumentation to assume that a uniform dress policy is immediately unrelaxed and uncomfortable, it is just uniform aka similar among all workers. Or "relaxed" in this context means leaving it up to the individual instead of enforcing a uniform rule?
You must be right, thanks!I think you're reading too much into it. Assume the argument is true. Then think, is the argument important and relevant?
--> Yes, because it talks about dress code and it talks about it being beneficial to the business (promotes productivity).
Hey!hey @Abbie Whitlock i hope you are well!
What is the best way to answer what news have you been following recently? I have a timeline of major breakthroughs that occurred, which multiple different news outlets have covered. But I am unsure of what questions I could be asked, and how long and how detailed I need to understand it.
Thank you so much !!