• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Does anyone have advice on how to navigate requesting time off from work to complete a vacation scheme? I don’t work in a legal role so it’s not something that’s commonly done
Take your annual leave. I’d recommend against telling them you have a vac scheme, it’s against the terms of some employment contracts to undertake work whilst employed elsewhere and they may not let you do the scheme.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DennyCrane
Hi @Abbie Whitlock I have a question about Stephenson Harwood's application. In Q3, it says "In up to 350 words, please outline a challenge that you think Stephenson Harwood will face over the next five years. You should draw on your current awareness and your commercial awareness to answer this question." In my answer, I first outlined the challenge the firm will face, and then stated how the firm is well positioned to face the challenge with its expertise. May I know if the structure is fine? Thank you
 
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Anyone emailed CRS about when we’re going to hear back?
Am leaving it alone bc I would think it won’t be til end of this week-ish depending on how long they gave ppl who got offers end of last week to accept them—what do I know, but I would think they’d want to see if they could give any more offers without having to tell people they got it late bc they were reserve
 
Hey not vac scheme related, but does anyone have any tips for revising for law? I have closed book exams for my modules and i’m really struggling with the volume of things that I would need to memorise.
Hey!

In general, what I found most helpful when revising (both in my undergrad, and for SQE1) was to make sure that I actually understood the concept and didn't just remember the wording of it. By approaching it that way, even if they tested a slightly different variation of the topic, I could usually figure out how the law would still be applied (rather than panicking!). I also found it helpful to condense my notes into shorter summaries or mind maps so that I could see the structure of a specific topic, and visualise how the cases and principles worked together. As I understood the concept, rather than memorising the wording of the textbook, this meant that I had to go over it less - even if the initial step of ensuring I understood it took slightly longer!

For closed book exams, active recall really helped me for the memorisation side of things too (+ it is what I'm currently using for SQE2). For example, I use Quizlet a lot to test myself on key principles and cases, and they have a great Learn feature that I thought was a great way to switch up the way I was learning (alongside the flashcards). Additionally, one of the best ways to remember topics is to teach it to a friend or course mate, as explaining it out loud usually makes it very clear what you actually understand and what you still need to go over. Over time, this made the volume feel a lot more manageable as I could focus on the areas that I knew I was weaker in.

Wishing you the best of luck with your exams - I'm sure you'll smash it!! :)
 
  • Love
Reactions: Futuretrainee002
@Abbie Whitlock hi, i was just wondering how you would differentiate the structures of these two application questions for Paul Hastings? should we still use the evidence based approach for the 1st question (mentioning the skills and then using our experiences to support it)?

What skills do you believe contribute to the success of a solicitor? (200)

Why are your skills/attributes suited to a career at Paul Hastings? Why should we offer you a Training Contract? (200)
Hey!

These two are definitely quite similar, but I would approach them slightly differently.

For the first question, I would focus more broadly on the skills that make a successful solicitor in general (e.g. commercial awareness, communication, attention to detail, teamwork, resilience, etc.). I don't think you necessarily need to go fully evidence-based here, but it could be helpful to briefly reference your past experiences to show that you understand what these skills look like in practice!

For the second question, this is where I would take a more evidence-based approach. You should focus on a few key skills / attributes that you have, support them with examples from your past experiences, and then link them back to why they would make you a good trainee at Paul Hastings specifically. Therefore, I'd have a look at their unique features and think about the skills that might be more applicable to those. The "why should we offer you a training contract" element is really about demonstrating that you fit with the firm and can show the value that you would bring.

To summarise, I'd split it into:

1. Q1: broader discussion of the skills that make a successful solicitor
2. Q2: your skills + evidence of them + clear link to why you would succeed at Paul Hastings as a trainee

Best of luck with your application! :)
 
Hi @Abbie Whitlock I have a question about Stephenson Harwood's application. In Q3, it says "In up to 350 words, please outline a challenge that you think Stephenson Harwood will face over the next five years. You should draw on your current awareness and your commercial awareness to answer this question." In my answer, I first outlined the challenge the firm will face, and then stated how the firm is well positioned to face the challenge with its expertise. May I know if the structure is fine? Thank you
Hello!

Yes, that structure sounds good to me! I'd say that outlining the challenge first and then discussing why Stephenson Harwood is well position to deal with it is a good way to approach the question, as it shows both your commercial awareness and that you have thought about the firm specifically.

If you have the space / word count, it can also be helpful to briefly mention why the challenge is particularly relevant to Stephenson Harwood (e.g. linking it to their key sectors, offices, or recent work). This way, you're not just identifying a general industry challenge but also showing that you understand how it could impact the firm and how its strengths position it to respond.

Overall, though, I'd say your structure sounds like the correct approach! Best of luck with your application :)
 
Hello!

Yes, that structure sounds good to me! I'd say that outlining the challenge first and then discussing why Stephenson Harwood is well position to deal with it is a good way to approach the question, as it shows both your commercial awareness and that you have thought about the firm specifically.

If you have the space / word count, it can also be helpful to briefly mention why the challenge is particularly relevant to Stephenson Harwood (e.g. linking it to their key sectors, offices, or recent work). This way, you're not just identifying a general industry challenge but also showing that you understand how it could impact the firm and how its strengths position it to respond.

Overall, though, I'd say your structure sounds like the correct approach! Best of luck with your application :)
Thank you very much for your detailed response!
 
  • Love
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Hey!

In general, what I found most helpful when revising (both in my undergrad, and for SQE1) was to make sure that I actually understood the concept and didn't just remember the wording of it. By approaching it that way, even if they tested a slightly different variation of the topic, I could usually figure out how the law would still be applied (rather than panicking!). I also found it helpful to condense my notes into shorter summaries or mind maps so that I could see the structure of a specific topic, and visualise how the cases and principles worked together. As I understood the concept, rather than memorising the wording of the textbook, this meant that I had to go over it less - even if the initial step of ensuring I understood it took slightly longer!

For closed book exams, active recall really helped me for the memorisation side of things too (+ it is what I'm currently using for SQE2). For example, I use Quizlet a lot to test myself on key principles and cases, and they have a great Learn feature that I thought was a great way to switch up the way I was learning (alongside the flashcards). Additionally, one of the best ways to remember topics is to teach it to a friend or course mate, as explaining it out loud usually makes it very clear what you actually understand and what you still need to go over. Over time, this made the volume feel a lot more manageable as I could focus on the areas that I knew I was weaker in.

Wishing you the best of luck with your exams - I'm sure you'll smash it!! :)
Thank you for the response Abbie!!
 
  • Love
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.