• Hey Guest, applications for BCLP’s Open Day close at 12pm on 25 September. Apply via this link. We wish you the best of luck!

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2026-27

Milbank done, that was effing awful.

How on earth can I ask for adjustments where there is nowhere which indicated what is in the test so I know which adjustments will need to be asked for!! Like something in there I 100% needed adjustments for but the firm didn't even respond to when I asked "what is in the test so I can know if i need adjustments or not".

Really disheartening

(before anyone asks for insight, my next test I plan to do is Sidley Austin, do with that information what you will)
Haven't done Milbank yet. How different is it to a run of the mill WG/SJT?
 
Hi! I just wanted an opinion on a question I had...

Would it be a disadvantage to apply for a firm whose applications had opened towards the start of Sept AFTER attending a law fair to gain some more insight into the firm (this would be at the beginning of October) - (note: the firm is non-rolling).

Do firms in general care if you apply mid-October if non-rolling...or is it like a black mark added ...
 
  • ✅
Reactions: Antoni Trochimowicz
Hi! I just wanted an opinion on a question I had...

Would it be a disadvantage to apply for a firm whose applications had opened towards the start of Sept AFTER attending a law fair to gain some more insight into the firm (this would be at the beginning of October) - (note: the firm is non-rolling).

Do firms in general care if you apply mid-October if non-rolling...or is it like a black mark added ...
Hi! Absolutely no disadvantage in applying later in the cycle for non-rolling firms.

For context, Skadden, where I got the TC, I applied to at 23:57 on deadline day... and hey I made it :)
 
Hi everyone!

Welcome to the TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread for the 2026-2027 application cycle.

This thread is for all discussions relating to vacation scheme applications throughout the year. Whether you are looking for advice on submitting written applications, online assessments, interviews, assessment centres, or simply want to share updates on your progress, feel free to post here!

As always, this thread is a space to ask questions, exchange insights, discuss firm processes, and support fellow applicants. The recruitment process can be both exciting and challenging, and we hope that this community continues to be a helpful resource for everyone navigating the cycle. Please remember to keep discussions respectful and constructive, and where possible, share information that may benefit other applicants.

If you want a clear way to organise your own applications, you can save firms, research them and track your progress through each stage in the free TCLA Workspace.

To assist you with your applications, we also have the Autumn, Winter, Spring and Summer Vacation Scheme Deadlines 2026-27 thread, and the Open Day and Insight Scheme Deadlines 2026-27 thread.

Finally, last year's thread can be found here: TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26.

Wishing the best of luck to everyone applying this year! We look forward to following your journeys and celebrating your successes along the way :)

Abbie


Hi everyone, @Abbie Whitlock @Andrei Radu

I’m applying to Slaughter and May again this cycle and wanted to get some advice on how best to approach my academic results.

I applied to Slaughter and May in the previous cycle and reached the interview stage. During that interview, I was asked about my B in A-level Law. At the time, I explained that I had experienced quite significant disruption with my Law teaching — my teacher was frequently absent, we were given the wrong textbook, etc. I later received feedback, and this wasn't identified as a particular issue with my interview.

Since then, I completed my second year at Lancaster University’s UK campus as part of my Study Abroad year. My overall university average is currently a 2:1, but I received two 58s in Land Law and Law of Torts. On the other hand, I achieved 70 in Commercial Law and 68 in International Law.

I’m therefore trying to work out how concerned I should be about the two 58s and, more importantly, how I should explain them if Slaughter and May asks.

The difficult part is that, honestly, I went through a period during the year where my wellbeing was quite poor and I don't think I was performing academically at my best. I didn't seek clinical/medical support at the time, so I obviously don't want to diagnose myself retrospectively or overstate this. There wasn't a bereavement or another obvious mitigating event either. However, I genuinely feel that my wellbeing affected my academic performance.

I'm considering whether to disclose this as mitigating circumstances on the application, but I'm unsure whether this would be appropriate given that I don't have formal medical evidence. I'm also conscious that I previously explained my A-level Law B partly through circumstances affecting my teaching, and I don't want my applications to come across as though I'm repeatedly explaining weaker grades through external circumstances.

I'm also wondering whether the fact that the two 58s are specifically in Land Law and Torts matters more given Slaughter and May's disputes practice. I have completed Lancaster's Commercial Law Mediation Clinic, which I really enjoyed, and achieved 70 in Commercial Law, so I'm hoping these experiences provide some evidence of my broader legal ability and interest in commercial law.

Would really appreciate advice from anyone who has applied to Slaughter and May, particularly if you've had experience with mitigating circumstances or explaining individual low module marks at interview.

Thanks!