Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Watson Glaser and Case Study Resources
Watson Glaser Cheat/Hint Sheet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I’m_Batman" data-source="post: 156615" data-attributes="member: 30556"><p>Firstly, thanks for doing this, you're a legend.</p><p>Secondly, and at risk of showing just how bad I am at WGs, can someone explain why this is 'conclusion follows'?</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't understand this because nothing to me suggests that Real Estate Assets that are located in central areas are <strong>not</strong> apartments. It follows that:</p><p>- All Real Estate Assets are either very large</p><p>- OR they are located in central areas (and not large)</p><p>- They are not both.</p><p>- No apartment is without air con (all apartments have air con)</p><p>- All Real Estate assets (including apartments I guess) that have air con are very large.</p><p></p><p>The only conclusion I get from this is that, Real Estate Assets that are in central areas will not have air conditioning, not that small assets cannot be apartments. Conclusion does not follow. Nothing tells me that Real Estate Assets that are in central areas are not apartments because there's no mention that apartments cannot be small assets?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I’m_Batman, post: 156615, member: 30556"] Firstly, thanks for doing this, you're a legend. Secondly, and at risk of showing just how bad I am at WGs, can someone explain why this is 'conclusion follows'? I don't understand this because nothing to me suggests that Real Estate Assets that are located in central areas are [B]not[/B] apartments. It follows that: - All Real Estate Assets are either very large - OR they are located in central areas (and not large) - They are not both. - No apartment is without air con (all apartments have air con) - All Real Estate assets (including apartments I guess) that have air con are very large. The only conclusion I get from this is that, Real Estate Assets that are in central areas will not have air conditioning, not that small assets cannot be apartments. Conclusion does not follow. Nothing tells me that Real Estate Assets that are in central areas are not apartments because there's no mention that apartments cannot be small assets? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Watson Glaser and Case Study Resources
Watson Glaser Cheat/Hint Sheet
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…