Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
Hey Guest,
Have an interview coming up?
We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week.
Book here
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Watson Glaser and Case Study Resources
Watson Glaser Practice Questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="H48" data-source="post: 48697" data-attributes="member: 8093"><p>Apologies if this is the wrong thread, but can anyone help with this WG inferences practice question? </p><p>The passage is "James is a human rights activist who was fined £60 on three different days during the past month for smoking in public at his workplace. On each of the occasions, he admitted to the act peacefully, telling policemen that he is unwilling to conform with such a breach of people's right to privacy. James paid the three fines shortly after receiving them."</p><p></p><p>The statement is "James has spent at least a couple hundreds of pounds in his struggle to oppose violation of civil liberties this year." </p><p></p><p>The correct answer is "probably true." However, I would have said "insufficient data." Even though James is a human rights activist who has spent £180 to oppose violation of civil liberties this month, there is no indication that other measures he takes to protect human rights involves fines and/or money. Even using outside knowledge, I just can't see how this is "probably true" and I've seen very similar questions where the answer is "insufficient data." Any help is appreciated!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="H48, post: 48697, member: 8093"] Apologies if this is the wrong thread, but can anyone help with this WG inferences practice question? The passage is "James is a human rights activist who was fined £60 on three different days during the past month for smoking in public at his workplace. On each of the occasions, he admitted to the act peacefully, telling policemen that he is unwilling to conform with such a breach of people's right to privacy. James paid the three fines shortly after receiving them." The statement is "James has spent at least a couple hundreds of pounds in his struggle to oppose violation of civil liberties this year." The correct answer is "probably true." However, I would have said "insufficient data." Even though James is a human rights activist who has spent £180 to oppose violation of civil liberties this month, there is no indication that other measures he takes to protect human rights involves fines and/or money. Even using outside knowledge, I just can't see how this is "probably true" and I've seen very similar questions where the answer is "insufficient data." Any help is appreciated! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Watson Glaser and Case Study Resources
Watson Glaser Practice Questions
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…