TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

[YS391]

anyone heard back from PMC post-AC? It's been more than 2 weeks

I had an AC today for their London office. They said they’re holding ACs for another 2 weeks and that we would find out about outcomes by the end of those 2 weeks.

Was urs for London?

 

[katgav_]

I believe they have already told everyone now (I received the call from the recruitment manager earlier this week)

What office did you apply for?

 

[knight1999]

Congrats, was you at 77% on hold before the invite?

Yeah I have the same question cuz mine has been on 77% and candidate review tick for ages … idk if that means they did not even review mine cuz i didn’t get the benchmark percentile

 

[trainee4u]

did they call or email? they never mentioned this during the AC so not sure what I should be prepared for PFO🙃

email.
I did AC the week of 13th January, WGT following week, then they said they'd email "successful" candidates the following week, so depending on when you did your AC, anything over a couple of full weeks gone by is likely to be a PFO I'd say.

 

[theruleofno]

Damn so Linklaters has been alive and active this whole time that’s crazy! I thought they’d disappeared off the face of the earth 🌍 after seeing how many people on this forum have been waiting for an application update from them. 🥲

Best of luck to everyone who applied to Linklaters for either SVS or DTC. 🙂​

I wouldn’t worry! I just received an AC offer yesterday. Those offers are from people who were fast tracked I believe. Either via pathfinders or an open day. I attended neither so hold out hope! My application was on 77% on hold with a tick by candidate review if that means anything

 

[badmintonflyinginsect]

I wouldn’t worry! I just received an AC offer yesterday. Those offers are from people who were fast tracked I believe. Either via pathfinders or an open day. I attended neither so hold out hope! My application was on 77% on hold with a tick by candidate review if that means anything

hey what does "on 77%" mean?

 

[aphelion]

Can anyone provide some tips on how I can prepare for a case study which involves real estate? I have 0 commercial awareness on this topic. What are the basic issues for me to keep an eye out for, and what concepts could I be researching now to make sure I have some basic knowledge?

 

[Cara888]

Hey guys! Do you think employers check your socials? I’ve seen a few “diml” solicitors on TikTok .

Do you think this kind of content is appropriate/ detrimental? 🤗

TikTok - Make Your Day

 

[Legal Wizard]

Which scheme are you doing please? I haven’t received an email yet.

Early April

 

[trainee4u]

Hey guys! Do you think employers check your socials? I’ve seen a few “diml” solicitors on TikTok .

Do you think this kind of content is appropriate/ detrimental? 🤗

TikTok - Make Your Day

Employers 100% check LinkedIn, I get many hits there. Logically they are going to also check twitter, facebook, tiktok, instagram, to a greater or lesser extent, and if you've got something off-colour there, then I'd expect it to cost you jobs.

 

[floral.tcla]

At an AC today, someone I know from uni discussed in the final break of the day (where the marketing team was present) that they (a woman) really liked that their intervieweres were all female because it removed one layer of social discomfort/anxiety in the context of a law firm interview, but clarified that they of course are sure that all lawyers at the firm ar entice including the men. Do you think the marketing team (employed at the firm) would have judged them for that or even rejected them for that comment? Because as a lawyer you need to be more careful when phrasing stuff?

context: this is like the end of a LONG day + the interview in question is a really technical, challenging interview. This person was otherwise quite friendly, smiley, etc!

 

[VMS]

hey what does "on 77%" mean?

People's applications with Linklaters are on 66% or 77%. Some people think this correlates with whether you get through or not, but I have seen someone who was on 66% get through so really it's just guess work.

 

[Chris Brown]

Employers 100% check LinkedIn, I get many hits there. Logically they are going to also check twitter, facebook, tiktok, instagram, to a greater or lesser extent, and if you've got something off-colour there, then I'd expect it to cost you jobs.

LinkedIn is the most common one for sure. I have had partners view my profile and then later on send me a request and I’m sat there like wtf should I do or say, this is normally supposed to be the other way around or something lmao. It actually scares me every time because I’ve no idea what their first impression is of me at all. 🥲

I remember the one that caught me off guard the most was when an international arbitration partner from Willkie viewed my profile and then requested me. I felt like I had just won the lottery but I was equally stressed out at the same time. Similar story for a competition litigation partner at Willkie who did the same thing. I hope they liked what they saw. I also hope it gets me extra brownie points for Willkie. 🥲​

 

[tomsmitg]

How bad is it if you use an example you have used in your application form as an example to a competency question in an interview ?

 

[trainee4u]

At an AC today, someone I know from uni discussed in the final break of the day (where the marketing team was present) that they (a woman) really liked that their intervieweres were all female because it removed one layer of social discomfort/anxiety in the context of a law firm interview, but clarified that they of course are sure that all lawyers at the firm ar entice including the men. Do you think the marketing team (employed at the firm) would have judged them for that or even rejected them for that comment? Because as a lawyer you need to be more careful when phrasing stuff?

not great, is it.

I mean you could go with "As a woman who understands that the upper echelons of the law industry are dominated by men I was inspired and encouraged to be interviewed by two women today and that the firm pays more than lip-service to equality and recognising the unique needs and contributions made by women to a law firm."

 

[legallycece]

Anyone heard back post Fieldfisher AC ?

 

[xMontmorency]

At an AC today, someone I know from uni discussed in the final break of the day (where the marketing team was present) that they (a woman) really liked that their intervieweres were all female because it removed one layer of social discomfort/anxiety in the context of a law firm interview, but clarified that they of course are sure that all lawyers at the firm ar entice including the men. Do you think the marketing team (employed at the firm) would have judged them for that or even rejected them for that comment? Because as a lawyer you need to be more careful when phrasing stuff?

If the marketing person isnt a recruiter you have nothing to worry about.

If it was gred rec, unless they're incredibly petty, that comment probably makes no difference.

 

[TCLA Community Assistant]

Hey guys! Do you think employers check your socials? I’ve seen a few “diml” solicitors on TikTok .

Do you think this kind of content is appropriate/ detrimental? 🤗

TikTok - Make Your Day

Depends on how much you promote your social media and also how searchable you are. People with very common names are not necessarily easy to find and people who do not use their full names on their social media are pretty difficult to find too.

 

[Lizzy]

Hi @Lizzy that is a great question and I do not think I have tackled this topic in depth before! People have different research methods which can yield equally good results. But if I were to explain my research philosophy, the starting point would be to "split" the law firm up between a number of different categories, which I would then represent as subheadings in my Firm Research document. Among the categories I used I included: Firm Basics, Financial Results, Business Strategy and Outlook, Main Practice Areas, Deals/Cases, Client Base, Awards & Recognition, Training Programme Details, Lateral Hires and Other News, Culture, DEI, and Pro Bono. This helped me immensely not just in better organizing the information I found, but in knowing what to look for.

In terms of the steps I took and the resources I used, I followed the approach bellow:

1. First, get the 'Firm Basics' right: what is its size, what countries does it have offices in, what work is it known for, what does its history look like and in particular what does its history in London look like etc.
2. Then, using a combination of searches using key terms on Google, the firm's own website and their LinkedIn account, try to fill as much information under those headings as you can.
3. Thirdly, use Chambers Student Guide, Chambers UK 2025 and Chambers Global; but also Legal 500 and for US firms Vault 2025 to get (i) a good firm overview; and (ii) a deeper analysis of practice area/sector expertise.
4. Fourthly, use the wider legal press to find out more insights on all of the previous points, but in particular for practice area expertise and business performance compared to competitors. Here I advise you to simply type the name of the firm in the search bar of the following publications: The Lawyer, Law.com, Bloomberg Law, The Global Legal Post, Business Law, and sometimes even Legal Cheeck. Some require a subscription but you may be able to access without paying using your university account.
5. Fifth, if the time allows for it look if there are any further resources you can use, such as podcasts and youtube channels - some done by the firm itself, and some run by the legal press (see The Lawyer's, Bloomberg Law, and Law, Disrupted).

Thank you so so much. This was incredibly helpful!!

 

[TCLA Community Assistant]

At an AC today, someone I know from uni discussed in the final break of the day (where the marketing team was present) that they (a woman) really liked that their intervieweres were all female because it removed one layer of social discomfort/anxiety in the context of a law firm interview, but clarified that they of course are sure that all lawyers at the firm ar entice including the men. Do you think the marketing team (employed at the firm) would have judged them for that or even rejected them for that comment? Because as a lawyer you need to be more careful when phrasing stuff?

context: this is like the end of a LONG day + the interview in question is a really technical, challenging interview. This person was otherwise quite friendly, smiley, etc!

There is no issue with the comment about it removing a layer of social anxiety. What specifically did you think was poorly worded?