- Sep 7, 2024
- 1,492
- 1,589
I can’t seem to find this from their site, but in any case I always recommend applying if interested - you never know!Hi, is RPC direct training contract rolling?
I can’t seem to find this from their site, but in any case I always recommend applying if interested - you never know!Hi, is RPC direct training contract rolling?
I’m guessing you got the AC? Most case studies are M&A, iirc. Maybe read Stoakes’ Know the City. Commercial Law handbook might help too.Hey - does anyone know what the hogan lovells case study is like? (ie is it M&A or something else)
Hi guys,
I hope you’re all well!
I’m not posting much nowadays as life is hectic (same as everyone else tbh) and my mental health has taken a bit of a toll.
In terms of applications, I am waiting to hear back from Mayer Brown (pretty sure it’s a PFO as my SJT results weren’t great), Farrer & Co and HFW TC post apps. Need to do some more applications but I have PGDL exams coming up so I’m busy with revision.
In terms of work- I have a good job with decent salary, but we were recently hit with the bombshell that a lot of redundancies are coming as the organisation has to cut millions from the budget by 1 Jan 2026!!! So now that’s another worry.
Probably will sound like such an entitled brat saying this but I’ve had a look for any legal positions available and they either require 50 years of legal experience, or the money is terrible. I don’t mind taking a bit of a cut but the salaries being offered are abysmal and I need money to live and also pay for uni!! So I am thinking of looking for another non-legal position in the meantime, but I’m worried it would give a negative impression on my commitment to law when doing applications.
If there’s any advice anyone can give then I’ll really appreciate it, but I just wanted to get this off my chest 😭
Is the SH TC rolling?
Thank you so muchHiya @legal18
Yep, Stephenson Harwood reviews training contract applications on a rolling basis. But their website seems to suggest that they only at applications as they come in rather than waiting until the deadline. It mentions that they don't fill all their places early, and they continue reviewing applications after the deadline too. I think you've still got some time, so getting a well-drafted application to them in the next few weeks should put you in a good position. Good luck!
Does anyone have tips on passing online assessments? The Watson glaser styles ones? I have reviewed all the breakdowns of each stage, but I just can’t seem to pass. I’ve even done a bunch of practice tests.
Thank you so much Ram!Hiya @SamiyaJ
Absolutely! There's no shame in looking for non-legal work right now. I did exactly that myself. If it's worth anything, I had never held a paid legal role before getting a vacation scheme. I worked mostly in project management, admin-type roles, and in retail jobs. Most of my legal experience came through pro bono work, which was pretty extensive but none of it was commercial. I think @Jessica Booker could say much more here, but my sense is that graduate recruiters understand how hard it is to get a legal job (especially one that’s paid decently).
While work experience is one way to demonstrate a commitment to commercial law, it's definitely not the only way. I think what made the difference for me wasn’t my job experience per se. What mattered more was consistently looking into opportunities related to commercial law: attending open days, law fairs, joining mentorship schemes through Aspiring Solicitors. More importantly, there is no substitute for writing well-researched, tailored applications. This made all the difference to me, even though I had very little experience of working in the City or in commercial law.
If your current role is at risk and you’re job hunting anyway, it might be worth also looking into adjacent fields like business development or consultancy (where your interest in law can still be an asset). Good luck with any job search and your applications!
Did you get an AC invite?Hey - does anyone know what the hogan lovells case study is like? (ie is it M&A or something else)
Did you get an AC invite? I'm just curious if they have been sent out. Thank youHogan Lovells’ DTCs are pretty limited. Don’t worry if you were rejected. Paul Hastings probably has more DTCs. To name just one other firm.
I was rejected after the WG.Did you get an AC invite? I'm just curious if they have been sent out. Thank you![]()
I honestly think that literally anything is 'good', it's just how you speak about it. I believe that drawing out the skills/ things you've learnt from any form of experience is a skill in itself that gets tested by firms/grad rec etcGuys after this application cycle I am very confused... What are considered to be good extracurriculars? Do you need to have a summer internship in renowned banking/consulting/financial service firms, and does it still count if it's not in the UK? Also do you need to do something really niche like walking for a fashion show or something?
(It's just everyone is telling me not to be a boring candidate and I have no idea how not to be viewed as boring by the GradRec.)
It really doesn't matter what the extracurricular activity is - what you need to demonstrate from the extracurriculars you do are commitment/dedication, having impact within them and transferable skills gained. But whether it is sports, arts, volunteering, faith/politics, academic/intellectual, community-led, or something just fun, it really doesn't matter - I have seen ultimate frisbee and cheerleading to be as (and sometimes more) impressive as "traditional" extracurriculars like mooting and writing for legal journals.Guys after this application cycle I am very confused... What are considered to be good extracurriculars? Do you need to have a summer internship in renowned banking/consulting/financial service firms, and does it still count if it's not in the UK? Also do you need to do something really niche like walking for a fashion show or something?
(It's just everyone is telling me not to be a boring candidate and I have no idea how not to be viewed as boring by the GradRec.)