Hey! I think the best way to approach these questions is to treat them like mini personal statements. I would keep them personal and tailored to
DLA Piper, and reflective of your own experiences when you can.
Here is how I’d break it down:
Personal Experience and Motivation for Law
This question is asking you to go beyond generic motivations (like problem-solving or liking to debate) and focus on something that genuinely developed your interest. This is ideally something that you personally experienced or were actively involved in.
The typical structure I would follow is:
- Briefly explain the context - what was the experience, and why was it relevant?
- Reflect on what you realised from this experience - did it change your perspective? Did it spark an interest in a distinct area, such as regulation?
- Link this to your long-term career ambitions - how did it lead you to pursue a career in law? Why does DLA Piper align with that?
This doesn’t have to be a legal experience! It could be something like helping someone navigate complex systems, a moment that taught you analytical thinking, or a personal situation with a legal element. The main thing is that you have to clearly link it back to your motivation for law!
I know that there aren’t a lot of words available due to the word limit, so you should aim to be as concise as possible. Hope this helps!