Reed smith test and VI! Is this automatic or do they read the app first?
I've attended a few of their events and they said multiple times they review before the test and then don't look at them again.Reed smith test and VI! Is this automatic or do they read the app first?
Make sure to take your time with the amberjack, everyone I know who's done it says this was a hard one - I can also confirm. HahReed smith test and VI! Is this automatic or do they read the app first?
This is what I'm thinking ahaI wonder how Bakers expect people to do the AC on the 9th if they don’t reply by today legit will be like 2/3 days notice 😭
It’s so interesting because the applications I spent the least time on, and that weren’t particularly well researched, ended up getting the most positive responses. Meanwhile, the ones where I really took my time, did loads of research, completed FYS, attended open days, etc., haven’t been successful at all.Quantity does improve odds, but without quality then quantity is pretty useless. To get through early stages, the application needs to stand out - and I guess unless you can do this at a big quantity, then it's better to take more time.
I agree with you!It’s so interesting because the applications I spent the least time on, and that weren’t particularly well researched, ended up getting the most positive responses. Meanwhile, the ones where I really took my time, did loads of research, completed FYS, attended open days, etc., haven’t been successful at all.
I do think quality is important, but I don’t think it matters all the time. That definitely hasn’t been the case for me, and I think quite a few other people have experienced the same thing.
I also wonder if luck plays a huge role. Maybe it’s not always about how many applications you submit or how strong they are, but factors outside your control, like applying at the right time, your application being read by the right person, or even mentioning a detail that happens to resonate with the reviewer.
I agree with you - this has been my experience too for most of my applicationsIt’s so interesting because the applications I spent the least time on, and that weren’t particularly well researched, ended up getting the most positive responses. Meanwhile, the ones where I really took my time, did loads of research, completed FYS, attended open days, etc., haven’t been successful at all.
I do think quality is important, but I don’t think it matters all the time. That definitely hasn’t been the case for me, and I think quite a few other people have experienced the same thing.
I also wonder if luck plays a huge role. Maybe it’s not always about how many applications you submit or how strong they are, but factors outside your control, like applying at the right time, your application being read by the right person, or even mentioning a detail that happens to resonate with the reviewer.
Big congrats🎉 - did you apply for spring or summer?Jheeze Akin selective online test invite! I sent my app mid Dec (13th - 15th).
They only have a spring vac I believeBig congrats🎉 - did you apply for spring or summer?
Congratulations! As far as I know, they read your app first and then shortlist for the test. Could I ask when you submitted your application?Reed smith test and VI! Is this automatic or do they read the app first?
Thanks for sharing this informatiion Harvey 💪Cooley said we’d hear back by mid Jan (15th), so we’ll all defo have heard back by next Fri!
Cooley got back to people around 9pm on the Friday last year so don’t panic if you’re still waiting on the day too!Thanks for sharing this informatiion Harvey 💪
omg well done huge congrats!! I assume this is summer also but could I ask when you applied?Received Dechert WE today
Luck plays a role, but also writing style and demonstrating your qualities. The content does matter of course, but so does how you present the content, particuarly for the ones with many long form questions.It’s so interesting because the applications I spent the least time on, and that weren’t particularly well researched, ended up getting the most positive responses. Meanwhile, the ones where I really took my time, did loads of research, completed FYS, attended open days, etc., haven’t been successful at all.
I do think quality is important, but I don’t think it matters all the time. That definitely hasn’t been the case for me, and I think quite a few other people have experienced the same thing.
I also wonder if luck plays a huge role. Maybe it’s not always about how many applications you submit or how strong they are, but factors outside your control, like applying at the right time, your application being read by the right person, or even mentioning a detail that happens to resonate with the reviewer.