Hello!
You are definitely not alone in feeling like this, and post-AC rejections can be really discouraging - particularly as it feels like you got so close!
It is very difficult to know whether things are objectively more competitive, or whether there is more visibility of rejections as people are sharing them more. I imagine it is probably a mixture of both, particularly as use of AI has increased and there are increasingly more applicants for every TC!
On how to "get it right" at an AC, it is tricky to give definitive advice as many firms will be assessing different things (and I have failed many ACs in the past!). However, instead of thinking "this is my only shot", it might help to reframe it as:
- This is one performance
- My job is to show my interest in the firm and be commercial and collaborative
- I can do all that I can, but the outcome is not fully within my control
I found that pressure often comes from treating the AC as a verdict on your potential. It definitely is not - overall, it is an assessment of your performance on one day, at one specific firm. Just because you are unsuccessful at one AC, this doesn't mean you don't have the potential - it simply means you might not be a good fit for that firm (which is okay!).
I actually think the thing that made the difference for me at my
Reed Smith direct TC AC was a shift in mindset. I (slightly naively!) thought I was very likely to receive a post-VS offer from the scheme I'd completed a week before, so I went into the AC with far less pressure on myself. Instead of thinking "this has to work", I approached it as an opportunity to show my interest in the firm, have good conversations, and perform to the best of my ability. This ended up making me calmer, more natural, and overall more present in the conversations I was having. Whilst I was still 'desperate' to do well in the AC as I really liked the firm, I wasn't overanalysing every answer or trying to be perfect.
Therefore, whilst I appreciate it is difficult to not think about the "this has to work" pressure at an AC, there is value in trying to reframe it as being one opportunity to perform well, rather than the only opportunity or a final judgment on your ability - this shift alone could help you be calmer and more focused on the day!
In terms of using your time well before the AC, I would:
- Practise structuring answers out loud, particularly for the more common interview questions (e.g. "Why Law", "Why this Firm", etc.)
- Revisit any core commercial themes, particularly those that are relevant to the firm you are interviewing at, and practise applying them to commercial news stories that you read online
- Try to practice written exercises and case studies - there are a few examples available on TCLA and online if you need them!
- For group exercises: these can be difficult to prepare for in advance, but remember to: focus on facilitating the discussion rather than dominating it, summarise ideas as you go along, and keep the group on track to ensure you finish the task on time.
On your question about feedback, I get what you mean as I have definitely received conflicting feedback in the past! In my first post-VS rejection I was told that I needed to work on my commercial awareness, as this is where I had scored the lowest - this was a few months after I was runner-up in BIUCAC, so I hadn't expected that!
Contradictory feedback is, unfortunately, very common - different assessors and firms will prioritise different qualities, so what one interviewer flags may not even register with another. Rather than trying to change your performance every time, I would focus on the core fundamentals: be clear and confident in your motivation for the firm, discuss commercial issues in a structured and logical way, and ultimately present yourself authentically. Consistency in those areas is far more powerful than trying to adapt for every firm or piece of feedback, and will ensure that you end up at the firm that is the best fit for you overall!
I generally have not been asked on why I was unable to convert previous schemes, but if you are asked, I would simply keep it neutral and focus on how you have grown since then. You could discuss what you learnt on the scheme and the feedback that you were given, and then explain the steps that you have taken to act on that feedback and apply that learning (e.g. being more proactive, refining commercial analysis, etc.). Firms understand that some firms have low conversion rates, or you might have had a bad day at the AC which meant you weren't able to convert - they won't view it negatively, provided you can show the steps you have taken to improve.
On group exercises, I have written a few posts on this previously - I have quoted them below. Just shout if you have any specific questions, and I can address those! Overall, I think it is just important to show the graduate recruitment team / assessors that you would be someone that is easy to work with and can work well within a team. This often matters more than getting the right answer, or speaking the most!
You have already shown resilience by getting to another AC, and that suggests that you are absolutely capable of securing a TC - it's all about finding the firm that is the right fit for you overall. Best of luck with the AC, I'm sure you will smash it!