• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

2020-21 Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
To add to this, if a lot of TCs are being given to first years, what are CC evaluating? Surely at the time of application the first years won’t have many undergraduate grades. Are they assessing candidates based almost solely on A levels? It’s just such a strange method of recruitment in my opinion.
I wonder their reasoning behind signing 18/19 y/os into contracts?
Fair enough if you know what you wanna do... but if you asked me what I wanted to be in first year, it would be in the cast of the Shrek musical. Not a lawyer yet. 😂 😭
 
I ... kinda feel like if you want a certain mould of a lawyer, you get them young and train them up. It feels like a control thing.

To me, this is remarkably short sighted, especially in a world in which diversifying intake has become key, but if you are CC and have several thousand applications for one place, you can afford to do it.

I hate it and I wouldn’t want to work there at all.
I've worked with a few students at my university who secured a TC with CC through the Spark scheme. All I can say is... good luck to them. 😂
 
Really not sure what their thinking is behind it precisely but it seems to be age based primarily...
Class action lawsuit TCLA squad? 😁
high school musical GIF


Representation of the TCLA community ^

I also find CC’s recruitment process to be very odd. They recruit largely from their SPARK scheme, most of my friends secured TCs this way from CC. I emailed GR regarding this whole new recruitment process still no response to this day haha, and they are ranked number 1 for graduate recruitment.. lol! They must be doing something right.
 
Wonder why CC pretty much only take penultimate students now for vacs and direct tc’s. Seems a bit discriminatory imo. Why is someone in their second year of uni better qualified to apply than someone in their final year/who’s graduated? They could all pretty much still start at the same time too, even if it was a year later.
I agree. It's also pretty bad to lock in first years for 3-4 years before they are able to start their contract, before they've even had a chance to look at other firms. Can't imagine it results in satisfied trainees at all. It's also kind of rude to act like graduates are 'washed up' and no one wants us, and that there are incredibly talented people who were just born a good lawyer who are better so they need to lock them in. I think its a bad move on their part, but they're missing out I guess!
 
I agree. It's also pretty bad to lock in first years for 3-4 years before they are able to start their contract, before they've even had a chance to look at other firms. Can't imagine it results in satisfied trainees at all. It's also kind of rude to act like graduates are 'washed up' and no one wants us, and that there are incredibly talented people who were just born a good lawyer who are better so they need to lock them in. I think its a bad move on their part, but they're missing out I guess!
I can’t imagine CC are getting much good feedback from this approach. It sounds like quite a few people have questioned their method. I’d be interested to see if they change their stance especially with A levels and first year grades being less reliable in the current climate (eg. teachers handing out grades).
 
high school musical GIF


Representation of the TCLA community ^

I also find CC’s recruitment process to be very odd. They recruit largely from their SPARK scheme, most of my friends secured TCs this way from CC. I emailed GR regarding this whole new recruitment process still no response to this day haha, and they are ranked number 1 for graduate recruitment.. lol! They must be doing something right.
Where do you see grad rec rankings?
 
I'm making a last minute application to Macfarlanes and wondering if anyone had any advice for structuring the 'Achievements' question please. Torn between either providing one detailed example using STAR or three smaller examples which each demonstrate a particular quality. I appreciate there is no wrong answer, but is the firm looking for us to state the quality or is it better to show not say?
 
I'm making a last minute application to Macfarlanes and wondering if anyone had any advice for structuring the 'Achievements' question please. Torn between either providing one detailed example using STAR or three smaller examples which each demonstrate a particular quality. I appreciate there is no wrong answer, but is the firm looking for us to state the quality or is it better to show not say?
Good luck with applications and I used STAR for that question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sibs23
For Orrick they ask you to address your covering letter to Sushila Nayak. Shall I just say Dear Sushila Nuyak then?
"Dear Sushila" is fine if you wanted to use that

Ms/Mr/Mrs is a really old tradition which is pretty much dead and buried these days.
 
"Dear Sushila" is fine if you wanted to use that

Ms/Mr/Mrs is a really old tradition which is pretty much dead and buried these days.
I have to say, it's very interesting to me that you say this as I have always been under the impression that it is a big no-no to call a professional by their first name - I am often myself addressed as 'Mr' in an e-mail even though I'm a student! I trust you though, so if you think the first name is better I will use that :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.