Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
Join Reed Smith for this practical session on how to write a strong vacation scheme application ahead of key deadlines. Understand what recruiters look for and how to get past the application review stage.
Hear from Recruitment Advisor Patrick Fermin Ryan at Osborne Clarke
on how to write a successful vacation scheme application. Gain expert advice on what makes applications stand out and how to approach yours with confidence.
I can't remember.. All I remember is that it had a smaller critical thinking part at the end. So draw assumptions and your reasoning was one of them. Sorry I can't be of more help!
Hello, I have a quick question, I wonder whether, in an application, it is better to use "unlawful" instead of "ultra vires". Ultra vires is obviously legal jargon and it fits better with my answer but at the same time I don't want it to sound too pretentious for lack of a better word.
Hello, I have a quick question, I wonder whether, in an application, it is better to use "unlawful" instead of "ultra vires". Ultra vires is obviously legal jargon and it fits better with my answer but at the same time I don't want it to sound too pretentious for lack of a better word.
I reckon sticking with "unlawful" is better. Most house writing styles are very much avoidant of legal jargon now, and there's a massive shift away from using overly complicated language as lots of people feel it makes the law inaccessible.
Hello, I have a quick question, I wonder whether, in an application, it is better to use "unlawful" instead of "ultra vires". Ultra vires is obviously legal jargon and it fits better with my answer but at the same time I don't want it to sound too pretentious for lack of a better word.
Yeah, I always went by the rule of 'if I included this would a client with no legal knowledge understand what it means?' If the answer's no then I would use a simpler term. In this case, I'd use unlawful for that reason
I reckon sticking with "unlawful" is better. Most in house writing styles are very much avoidant of legal jargon now, and there's a massive shift away from using overly complicated language as lots of people feel it makes the law inaccessible.
Yeah, I always went by the rule of 'if I included this would a client with no legal knowledge understand what it means?' If the answer's no then I would use a simpler term. In this case, I'd use unlawful for that reason
Yeah, I always went by the rule of 'if I included this would a client with no legal knowledge understand what it means?' If the answer's no then I would use a simpler term. In this case, I'd use unlawful for that reason
Tbh, I actually want to know when their vac scheme is because work have told me I need to put in provisional dates for annual leave asap. Reckon it's okay to email them and ask that? And just tag at the end, when are we likely to receive an outcome?
Tbh, I actually want to know when their vac scheme is because work have told me I need to put in provisional dates for annual leave asap. Reckon it's okay to email them and ask that? And just tag at the end, when are we likely to receive an outcome?
Are they even definitely having a vac scheme? I know in previous years they’ve said that the vac scheme forms part of their final assessment for the TC, but there has literally been no mention of a vac scheme happening this year, or any dates given, and the application was for a direct TC. I’m very confused at this point 🥴
Are they even definitely having a vac scheme? I know in previous years they’ve said that the vac scheme forms part of their final assessment for the TC, but there has literally been no mention of a vac scheme happening this year, or any dates given, and the application was for a direct TC. I’m very confused at this point 🥴
On their careers portal and trainee solicitor job description it has a heading of 'vacation scheme' and at the end it says 'DAC Beachcroft runs a combined application process, with the vacation scheme forming part of the assessment process for training contract place.'
But honestly, considering how the deadline was literally ages ago I don't know how they've left it this long to even start inviting people to ACs let alone VS!
Are they even definitely having a vac scheme? I know in previous years they’ve said that the vac scheme forms part of their final assessment for the TC, but there has literally been no mention of a vac scheme happening this year, or any dates given, and the application was for a direct TC. I’m very confused at this point 🥴
On their careers portal and trainee solicitor job description it has a heading of 'vacation scheme' and at the end it says 'DAC Beachcroft runs a combined application process, with the vacation scheme forming part of the assessment process for training contract place.'
But honestly, considering how the deadline was literally ages ago I don't know how they've left it this long to even start inviting people to ACs let alone VS!
Hello all! It’s been a bit of a stressful time at the day job so I had checked out of TC applications. Coming back to them now, and I see that I’ve missed several deadlines. I know that the answer is likely to be if you don’t apply, you don’t have a chance, but, realistically, is there any point is stressing over applications this late in the game? Some of the remaining firms have quite small intakes too - like Boodle Hatfield, Withers, Penningtons. Any insight / thoughts would be great!
PS: I see Dentons is still taking applications? I don’t know why I thought they had finished their recruitment. Does anyone know if they review on a rolling basis?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.