Did you receive feedback in the email?My VI went well other than the fact my audio cut out in the last question, which I did inform grad rec of! I got pfod despite thinking it was my best lol 💔
Did you receive feedback in the email?My VI went well other than the fact my audio cut out in the last question, which I did inform grad rec of! I got pfod despite thinking it was my best lol 💔
Nope “Unfortunately, due to the large volumes of applications we receive we cannot provide feedback at this stage”Did you receive feedback in the email?
I think different strategies work for different people.Even current trainees I've met say to always take advice from others with a grain of salt because we're all different and also all it takes is one firm to make you an offer. You could be applying to 40 firms and get 39 rejections and one offer. That's not really an indication of a strategy to me.
I only apply to firms I am genuinely interested in, engaged with or see myself building a career with and that helps when researching because I feel more motivated.
Each of us is different, it's not one size fits all.
I haven't heard back... have people been pfod already? I applied to the Manchester officeThose who heard back from ES (I think it was the regional office applicants who heard back), how was your vi? I’m getting stressed and have a feeling london applicants will also hear back this week.
hey congrats!! is this for thr pathway to practice? -when did you applyDoes anyone have any insights on the Fieldfisher VI ?!
Thank you!! Yes it is for pathways - I applied on 9th Octoberhey congrats!! is this for thr pathway to practice? -when did you apply
It was really just a combo of different things. For the WG style part, the passages were so long and unnecessarily complex (think your normal WG but just 10x worse). There was also a section where you had to organise your schedule in a way that accommodated your team and their availability, and another part where you had to book meetings without them clashing with existing ones.What’s so bad about it 😭
That's a really good score. Basically a 75%does anyone know what amberjack scores are considered competitive for reed smith... got 7767 (...) and mid verbal reasoning and numerical reasoning😓 my first experience with the amberjack pillars
also, do firms place much weighting on the sjt or is the VI component more decisive?
I think we more or less said the same thing here.. 🙃😊I think different strategies work for different people.
If you're very confident in your application or know there are only some firms you'd be happy with, it's worth it to focus and write detailed applications. The pay off is worth it because you're investing more time for better results.
If you're someone like me who genuinely wouldn't mind the firm they work at (I'm really, really interested in tax and so every corporate law firm has a tax team), you can apply everywhere and still end up with a reasonable result that you'd be happy with.
Oh gosh! Thanks for the heads up. Annoying that they changed the test as this is one of my top firms!It was really just a combo of different things. For the WG style part, the passages were so long and unnecessarily complex (think your normal WG but just 10x worse). There was also a section where you had to organise your schedule in a way that accommodated your team and their availability, and another part where you had to book meetings without them clashing with existing ones.
I’d say the novelty of it all threw me off, because I was expecting a more traditional WG. Doing it for the first time was quite challenging, especially given how little time they give you to complete everything which honestly just made it 10x worse 😅
Only people who applied for spring have heard back I think. That too, I’ve hardly seen 2-3 people say it on here. Give it some timeIf people who applied after me have received Dechert WE, should I assume my PFO is imminent?
Wow! Which firm is this? I thought only farrers did this.I'm applying to a firm that offers the option of applying to both the vacation scheme and training contract (under one application). Is it a good idea to do this, and if so, how would I frame this in my answer to the question: 'What attracts you to applying to our vacation scheme/training contract?'. Would I just write separate points in the intro regarding why a vacation scheme would be useful and why a training contract would be useful?
Idek how the selection process would work for applying to both but I am assuming I would just be considered for both schemes and would get one or the other rather than both but I have no idea - it doesn't say anything on the website about how applying to both schemes work. This firm does not seem to recruit directly from vacation schemes, as it says on the website that 'many of the people that attend the vacation scheme go on to apply for the training contract'.
Acuity Law!Wow! Which firm is this? I thought only farrers did this.