Clifford Chance PFO, still waiting on Orrick though…
Hey!How do people go about applying for paralegal roles, with previous vac scheme?
Is it not obvious that I actively want a TC if I've been completing vac schemes, if they are asking about my future do I declare that I would want to apply for TCs. (Note the one I am currently applying for is a legal support centre, no trainees, basically no lawyers in the building)
Absolutely not!! Firms don’t care about the PGDL as long as you have a commendation (2.1) overall. Now that the SQE is in place it’s even less important.guys j had a Q
I got my pgdl results back and got an average of 78 ( a distinction) , including a 96/100 in company law , which is the second highest amongst 3500 students. 80+ in tort and contract too. However , somehow got a 51 in Public law 1 lmao. Do yall reckon it would have a substantial impact on applications next year?
Yea that makes sense if that’s the case! Or maybe ask if it could be considered as a Direct TC application instead
Heyy bothI'm assuming they overlapped and this person couldn't do both. If you can then YES DO BOTH. Alternatively ask if there is wiggle room with dates
I'm also wondering... I hope soHas anyone progressed with an Amberjack getting mid numerical and mid verbal
had OP got 49 and had to resit, that would be an issue. But 51 is not.Absolutely not!! Firms don’t care about the PGDL as long as you have a commendation (2.1) overall. Now that the SQE is in place it’s even less important.
Thanks for the response! I’ve applied to LondonYes I spoke to head of recruitment! It’s for Bristol and Reading offices as they had their ACs last week. London will probably be the following week (admittedly didn’t ask as I’m Bristol based) but would likely follow the same time period post-AC. Which office are you applying to?![]()
Huge congratulations! Which office did you apply for?OC summer vac scheme!!! Omg im actually in disbelief especially after i got a post vac scheme rejection yesterday.
would it be worth asking for a remark if that's possible? just in case something random happened with the marking/putting it in the systemguys j had a Q
I got my pgdl results back and got an average of 78 ( a distinction) , including a 96/100 in company law , which is the second highest amongst 3500 students. 80+ in tort and contract too. However , somehow got a 51 in Public law 1 lmao. Do yall reckon it would have a substantial impact on applications next year?
Yes of course, but a fail would cap the overall grade at Pass anyways (at least at ULaw, unsure about BPP and other providers)had OP got 49 and had to resit, that would be an issue. But 51 is not.
Honestly its very firm dependent. I had a similar situation with my grades from uni (highest grade was 75% on diss which was on company and contract law and tort law, but lowest was public law at 55%) and still made it through to pretty decent firms (including top US firms). That said, some firms explicitly state they require 2:1 across all modules and some (like Cleary) ask for 65%+ across all modules. I think considering your rankings aside from the public law module, you should be pretty set (one or two hiccups amongst such good grades) would be okay I THINK!guys j had a Q
I got my pgdl results back and got an average of 78 ( a distinction) , including a 96/100 in company law , which is the second highest amongst 3500 students. 80+ in tort and contract too. However , somehow got a 51 in Public law 1 lmao. Do yall reckon it would have a substantial impact on applications next year?