I really don’t think this will be an issue considering it is really only one exam/module. The 59% module will definitely not be an issue - it’s really only the capped resit that will raise an eyebrow. You may want to explain this in applications given the circumstances.
I would ensure both are covered. It’s important to make the focus on the brand ambassador role though - the answer should not talk about the firm or opportunity as if it is a TC or VS opportunity.
A lot of firms will expect the SQE in person, especially if it is a bespoke course, but may look to provide other support, such as interest free loans, salary advances or holiday work to help people afford living in London.
For the SRA to be aware of this, they must hold the records still from your initial registration 12 years ago.
I suspect you will need more expert advice on this as this is very specific query - there are some law firms who provide legal advice on this particular topic. All I do know is that...
The Early Careers team won’t be responsible for the role, so normally I would recommend finding another email address. If there is not one, you can email the Early Careers team but you may not get a response or the response might be delayed at best.
It may be best to connect with White & Case trainees via LinkedIn for this type of insight. Although I am sure @Amma Usman, @Andrei Radu and @Ram Sabaratnam may have some useful insights into US firms more generally, if you are looking for W&C specific information on this, this may be better...
It was intense but I used to get into a routine with it and then was surprisingly okay if you had no distractions. Some applications do not take very long to review though, while others may actually need to be reviewed more than once.
I think a lot of what I miss I get through TCLA instead, so...
I can vouch for the fact this is very possible even if only 1 person was screening! I have done double that in a week on my own anyway (and with no AI!!).
I’d recommend looking at the firm’s templates or previous examples that they will have on their filling systems for this as formats can vary quite considerably from firm to firm.
Yes, it can be quite normal for these processes to be drawn out over a few months for ad-hoc roles. It could easily be that someone has forgotten to take it down from the careers website or that the role is still accepting applications.
It is also very normal (unfortunately) not to hear back...
I would say this would actually be quite difficult. In-house roles tend to be much more corporate/commercial based, with general advisory work (eg regulations) rather than having a litigation focus. There might be some in-house roles that are more litigation specific and in those cases it could...
I think its good if you want to work in-house long term, and especially if you have an interest in financial services or the insurance industry.
Moving to private practice is not going to be straight forward if your experience is mainly in-house, even with a six-month secondment to a private...
To me, graduate apprenticeships are no different to training contracts - you just do your SQE training alongside working rather than ahead of the TC. Otherwise they are the same opportunity.
Generally no - it would be better to wait for the 2028 cycle to open than apply now. A firm would see what stage of your academics you are in and then most likely reject you anyway as you could not start by that start date - in the exact same way they would if a 2nd year law student doing a four...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.