Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
I wouldn’t say avoid it as it’s great evidence to have - I just wouldn’t dedicate a lot of wording to it.
A brief reference is typically sufficient, and you can focus more on the topic than the firm if that helps too - e.g. “Having completed Forage programmes in M&A and Intellectual Property, I...
Some firms do have policies that state you can only apply once in a calendar or academic year, Or within a 12 month period, so if that is the case you should factor that into your decision making as to whether to apply or wait.
You may find more success once you have your final year grades, as...
It’s not that it’s bad on its own, it’s just more worrying when all of someone’s employment is through connections.
When it comes to wording, phrase it more on how you either obtained or made the most of that connection, rather than the connection itself.
Sometimes people do hear back quicker: but depends on a whole range of factors that differ from firm to firm. For instance, if your firm runs multiple vacation schemes, it is not unreasonable for them to wait until all of them have concluded before offering people.
I wouldn’t worry about what...
I think if you are applying for 2025 TCs, most firms are moving to the SQE by that date, and if that is the case the LPC is an expensive way to get an exemption for SQE1
It is hard to say - I think many firms won’t care, as long as you pass, but there could be some concerns about your breadth of knowledge (a lot of SQE is not actually that important/relevant to commercial firms).
I would speak to some firms you think you will apply to and get their view on this.
Cover letter should focus on your motivations then - there is a slight overlap with the what makes Farrer stand out question, but I think you can talk about things that are important to you but maybe don’t “stand out” in the cover letter as to why you applied to them.
Very normal. It’s fine for you to send a thank you but it’s very normal for people to not respond to that.
I know it may seem impolite but they are dealing with hundreds of emails a day and responding is not going to be a priority. They most likely forwarded it to graduate recruitment for...
I personally wouldn’t unless the firm uses the acronym themselves.
This thread gives some useful examples of how you can save word count though in other ways:
https://www.thecorporatelawacademy.com/forum/threads/how-to-get-your-applications-within-their-word-limits.3701/
You may want to group them together rather than listing them all out - eg “I attended X, Y, Z events to find out more about alternative legal careers. Attending these events confirmed I was more suited to a career as a solicitor”
If it is effectively a first sitting, there is no issue. Your grades will be seen as a first sitting by academics and recruiters. You can just explain you took the exams at a later date to ensure the reasonable adjustments required were applied to your assessments.
What is the potential outcome of the concessions? Eg would you grade be revisited, would you have to resit?
I ask as many universities won’t retrospectively apply extenuating circumstances, so this is something different to the norm.
What specifically are the SQE questions?
Sounds like the cover letter should be more motivational based. Are you being asked about why the firm in the application?
100 words per point is quite a lot (roughly 3-4 sentences). I am sure this should be sufficient, but if you want to go for one main point that is fine, especially if you feel you can leverage other evidence elsewhere that would showcase your motivations.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.