2020-21 Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
hi everyone! I was just wondering if law firms look at grades really strictly. I've consistently been getting 2:1s but at the lower range so 62-65 and I wonder if that will affect me negatively or are grades just viewed in a way I'll be fine as long as I meet the 2:1 benchmark?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Asil Ahmad
hi everyone! I was just wondering if law firms look at grades really strictly. I've consistently been getting 2:1s but at the lower range so 62-65 and I wonder if that will affect me negatively or are grades just viewed in a way I'll be fine as long as I meet the 2:1 benchmark?

Depends on the firm. Certain firms care more about grades e.g. Slaughter 'and' May whereas others just care about the 2:1. For reference, I have a 54 in contract law but that hasn't stopped me from getting ACs because I have a 2:1 overall.
 
Depends on the firm. Certain firms care more about grades e.g. Slaughter 'and' May whereas others just care about the 2:1. For reference, I have a 54 in contract law but that hasn't stopped me from getting ACs because I have a 2:1 overall.

Thank you! I was just worried because even though I have consistently scored 2:1 (albeit on the lower end), I barely have any firsts in my module! Just thought that will be a concern. But thank you so much for the clarification, definitely eases my worries.
 
hi everyone! I was just wondering if law firms look at grades really strictly. I've consistently been getting 2:1s but at the lower range so 62-65 and I wonder if that will affect me negatively or are grades just viewed in a way I'll be fine as long as I meet the 2:1 benchmark?
I wanted an opinion on this also like if you have a 2.2 in second or third year and you average a 2.1 overall in your degree will you be a weaker candidate and lead to rejection mainly for US and MC firms I think @Jessica Booker will be the best to answer this if possible.
 
I wanted an opinion on this also like if you have a 2.2 in second or third year and you average a 2.1 overall in your degree will you be a weaker candidate and lead to rejection mainly for US and MC firms I think @Jessica Booker will be the best to answer this if possible.
I have such a range of grades (49% to 84%, however a 2.1 in both years) and have had ACs with MC and US firms whilst also having a VS last year! So it really depends more on the individual firm rather than the group!
 
Last edited:
I wanted an opinion on this also like if you have a 2.2 in second or third year and you average a 2.1 overall in your degree will you be a weaker candidate and lead to rejection mainly for US and MC firms I think @Jessica Booker will be the best to answer this if possible.
Grades are definitely looked at closely.

A overall 2.2 in your second or third year will not be ideal. Occasional module is fine, but a 2.2 average in a year will be a concern for many firms, even if you did average a 2.1 by the end of your degree.
 
I wanted an opinion on this also like if you have a 2.2 in second or third year and you average a 2.1 overall in your degree will you be a weaker candidate and lead to rejection mainly for US and MC firms I think @Jessica Booker will be the best to answer this if possible.
I don't necessarily agree - I lean towards the view that firms look at your applications holistically.

For instance - I didn't do too well in one of my public law modules last year, and it dragged my grade down to a low 2.1, whereas I did well on the rest of them, namely contract, criminal and tort which I presume are the more important ones for some firms. I don't feel like it has hindered me, and I seem to be doing better with US firms which tend to have more stringent academic requirements.

So I think firstly, sometimes it depends on which module you have done poorly in, but also the quality of the rest of your application, how well you score on the tests/WG etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MandyAA
Status
Not open for further replies.