Hi everyone, thank you for your time to answer questions. I have the following questions:
1. Simpson Thacher describes its training contract as giving trainees an understanding of the full private equity lifecycle. In practice, where do you think trainees most clearly see the advantage of Simpson advising sponsors across areas such as M&A, financing and funds, rather than approaching each transaction in isolation?
2. Because this is Simpson Thacher’s first London training contract, what have partners been able to design differently from a more established City training model?
3. When you read applications, what distinguishes someone who is genuinely motivated by private equity from someone who has simply researched the sector well?
1. Simpson Thacher describes its training contract as giving trainees an understanding of the full private equity lifecycle. In practice, where do you think trainees most clearly see the advantage of Simpson advising sponsors across areas such as M&A, financing and funds, rather than approaching each transaction in isolation?
2. Because this is Simpson Thacher’s first London training contract, what have partners been able to design differently from a more established City training model?
3. When you read applications, what distinguishes someone who is genuinely motivated by private equity from someone who has simply researched the sector well?