Slight confuson over
Skadden's application question:
"Why are you applying to a training contract at Skadden and why do you believe you are suited to the firm" 300 word max. I feel this is similar to the A&O question that was brought up at some point, where it was unclear if it was asking why commercial law, why the firm (clients and practice areas) or why specifically their training (small intake, seat rotatione etc.)
Any advice on how to answer this? And what is the best way to split this answer up; 150 words on the first part and 150 word on why im suited to the firm (linking my skills and experiences back to the firm)?