Why would it? After all non law students apply and get TCsHow does it work being a Scottish law student applying for any english law firm VSs? Is it feasible or would you be majorly disadvantaged?
Doesn't matter. As long as it's clear what you did and where. I prefer bullet points personally because I feel it gives people who are reading hundreds of applications a chance to skim easily. I've had huge success this cycle and mine are mixed in the same app- work in bullet point volunteer work in prose.For the 'Work History' section of the Paul Weiss application, does anyone know if we can respond in bullet-point format (like on a CV), or do they expect full written descriptions? In general, what do law firms usually prefer? Is there a way to know the preferences of each firm?
Hey, congratulations on getting an AC with PMC. Can I please ask when you applied and which office this was for? xPMC AC! Any insights would be much much appreciated xxxxxxxxxx can offer insights on Covington/HSF/Jones Day/CC ACs and Forsters/Goodwin/Mishcon/Willkie/B&B, W&C and CC (last year) VIs
Has anyone who wasn't fast tracked even heard back?If I am still waiting to hear back for Linklaters and Latham Spring, shall I assume PFO?
mixed, 'excelled' in verbal reasoning, but i've yet to see anyone not get that so.how did the baker sjt go for people? i just got my score back and they are BAD so don't know if it passes the benchmark or not
hey! can't be of any help i'm afraid, congrats on getting the AC! do you mind me asking when you completed the online strengths and heard back? also what office? Thanks xHi !
Would anyone who has experience with Fieldfisher's Diversity Access Scheme AC or the AC in general be willing to provide any insights on what to expect ?
Thanks in advance.
links could be considering you for Summer.Has anyone who wasn't fast tracked even heard back?
During the open day, Paul said that he preferred a prose type format.For the 'Work History' section of the Paul Weiss application, does anyone know if we can respond in bullet-point format (like on a CV), or do they expect full written descriptions? In general, what do law firms usually prefer? Is there a way to know the preferences of each firm?
Depends on the firm. Some firms have told me bullet points and others have told me prose. But for example, I did prose for Skadden even though someone said they prefer prose and still got to WE, so I think if you're strong you're ok either way.For the 'Work History' section of the Paul Weiss application, does anyone know if we can respond in bullet-point format (like on a CV), or do they expect full written descriptions? In general, what do law firms usually prefer? Is there a way to know the preferences of each firm?
Doesn't matter. As long as it's clear what you did and where. I prefer bullet points personally because I feel it gives people who are reading hundreds of applications a chance to skim easily. I've had huge success this cycle and mine are mixed in the same app- work in bullet point volunteer work in prose.
i got 3 in one, 4 in two and 6 in one so im pretty sure i am cooked. i did the first year scheme with the firm so im kinda sadmixed, 'excelled' in verbal reasoning, but i've yet to see anyone not get that so.
then I did well in two sections, and less well in two (got a 3/9 bars in one). so i'm unsure. if it's a cumulative thing, I might be okay, but I'm guessing they have a minimum for each section maybe? if that's the case i may be cooked.
little disappointed as I really like the firm, but it's not over until it's over, (or until next year when i will try again lol)
Can i ask how you did last year if that's alright? / do you know anything about what you need to progress?just did the baker sit and i definitely did worse than i did last year when i progressed… uh oh 🫣