- Sep 7, 2024
- 469
- 1,082
is asking the lawyers where they would choose to go on secondment if they were trainees now a stupid question at the end of an interview ahah
Hiya @member7830
I just wanted to add to what @Jessica Booker rightly said. I don't think it’s a stupid question at all, but how you frame it can make a big difference. I think the key is to give it some context so that it feels more like a thoughtful discussion rather than just a curiosity-driven question.
One way to approach it is by tying it to the firm’s broader strategy. Think, for instance, about why a partner might be interested in answering this question. You might get them to speak to the type of work done in certain offices or the type of pressures particular offices face, and get a sense of what they think it would be valuable for someone who is a trainee to experience. You could say something like: "I know that secondments can offer really valuable exposure, and given the firm’s strategy and the way client work varies across different offices, I’d be really interested in your perspective on where a trainee might go to do work that is very different from what's done in the London office?" This makes it clear that you’re thinking about the bigger picture rather than just where might be a fun place to go (lol). As long as you show that you’re trying to engage with the firm’s approach (and the partners' insight) in a meaningful way, it can absolutely be a well- received question!
Last edited: