Great thank you! its always the 'story' part that throws me off, like I could talk about the Thames water situation, for example, as that's a story, but it's harder to link the wider trends of that to a firm
I think the link would be the precedent set by the deal or dispute. For Thames Water, there were a number of novel points that the courts considered re the restructuring. 🥲
The UK High Court approved the restructuring and the UK Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal made by the different creditors, upholding the UK High Court decision. 🥲
Reading firms’ summaries of it is a good way of understanding the link between wider commercial trends and the impact on law firms. I have linked some of them below:
www.paulweiss.com
Hopefully this helps with connecting the story to the firm, factoring in wider commercial and legal implications. I think the best way would be to use PESTLE, but I’m not too sure. 🙂
The UK High Court approved the restructuring and the UK Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal made by the different creditors, upholding the UK High Court decision. 🥲
Reading firms’ summaries of it is a good way of understanding the link between wider commercial trends and the impact on law firms. I have linked some of them below:
Three’s a Crowd? The Thames Water Restructuring Plan(s)
Key Takeaways: In one of the most high-profile and hotly-watched cases in the London restructuring market, on 18 February 2025, the English High Court approved the restructuring plan proposed by Thames Water. The Court gave permission to appeal the Court’s order to a group of challenging junior...
Hopefully this helps with connecting the story to the firm, factoring in wider commercial and legal implications. I think the best way would be to use PESTLE, but I’m not too sure. 🙂
Last edited: