-
Join Premium →Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training ContractNow half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
- Thread starter Ram Sabaratnam
- Start date
In general, AC's are less about “trying to catch you out” and more about whether you can think clearly under time pressure, communicate in a measured, commercial way and work effectively with others in a professional setting.
From my knowledge, Links have a group exercise and a written exercise followed by a partner interview.
1. For the group exercise, focus on collaboration rather than domination. Linklaters places real value on calm, measured contributions, active listening, and building constructively on others’ points. You do not need to be the loudest voice to stand out.
2. For the Written / case exercise, this is primarily a test of structure, judgement, and commercial awareness. Clear issue-spotting, logical prioritisation, and concise recommendations matter far more than technical legal detail. Beyond high-level concepts (e.g. asset vs share sales, raising capital through debt or equity and the mechanisms for doing), no deep technical knowledge is expected.
3. For the Interview, preparing well-rehearsed but genuine answers to competency and motivation questions goes a long way. “Why law?”, “Why Linklaters?”, and “Why you?” are almost guaranteed to come up, so you should be able to answer these confidently and consistently with your application.
4. Linklaters-specific insight, they've made significant investments in legal tech and AI, including developing its own in-house GenAI chatbot (“Laila”) on Microsoft Azure and integrating external models such as Legora into day-to-day workflows. The firm also runs an AI sandbox and structured internal idea campaigns, encouraging lawyers at all levels to propose practical AI use cases. This reflects a systematic, firm-wide approach to innovation rather than isolated pilots, a useful point to reference when discussing culture, future-facing work, or commercial awareness (be sure to link it to your interests!).
I hope this helps and good luck!
Hi @Novaa
I genuinely understand how you may be feeling right now – I felt the exact same way as a graduate when applying for VS and TCs.
For context, I graduated in 2023 and secured a TC in 2025. I spent two years working in a mixture of roles, including working as sales assistant and later as a paralegal.
It is important to understand that time is not running out and that every single candidate has their own timeline. For example, I met vacation schemers who had applied for the very first time and succeeded, and candidates who, like myself, had been applying for 3+ years until they managed to secure something.
I personally found that this entire journey is about longevity and consistency. If this is a career you truly want then, time, to an extent, is irrelevant to the equation.
However, I understand that everyone has personal circumstances which may shape your nervousness and feeling like time is running out. Something that helped me was focussing on securing a paralegal role. By doing this, I felt comfortable knowing that I am still doing something related to commercial law but just on a much smaller scale.
Hope this helps and wishing you lots of luck! 👍
Hi @oliviabeijing
It is very hard to tell which order graduate recruitment sends out VI/AC invites. For example, many times, I was invited to a VI very late and I still managed to make it to the next stage even though other candidates were invited much earlier.
On a side note, something that helped me from stressing out was learning to forget about the fact that I even applied to the firm after submitting the application. It sounds extreme but it really does help with blocking out the anticipation to continuously check your emails and the stress about finding out that someone else has been invited to the next stage but you have not heard back.
Good luck and sending positivity your way! 👍
Hi guys, I was unfortunately rejected from Willkie at the first stage 
I thought I wrote a pretty solid app, could anyone critique it and see what might have been the issue? Thank you.
Q1 - Please explain why you would like a career in commercial law.
Max 250 words
I am motivated by intellectually demanding environments where issues are complex and stakes are high. As a national-level debater, I thrived on analysing dense material under time pressure, anticipating counterarguments, and adapting strategy in real time. Alongside this, founding a small (redacted) business sparked a strong interest in commerce and how relationships shape business outcomes. Commercial law therefore appeals to me because it combines these interests, requiring lawyers to strategically analyse legal risks in achieving their clients’ commercial objectives.
My commitment to this career path has been consistent and long-standing. Before university, I interned in the corporate practice of (law firm), a leading (non-UK) full-service law firm. Despite having to relocate to another state, I seized this opportunity to gain practical experience and developed rapport with a partner by producing high-quality due diligence reports, ultimately securing a letter of recommendation. At university, a first-year scheme with (large US firm)–particularly a panel on cross-border project finance–highlighted how commercial judgement and contractual protections are essential to managing regulatory and investment risk. I later saw this in practice as a summer analyst at (Boutique PE fund), where reviewing investment covenants highlighted the importance of lawyers’ role in preserving investor confidence through the structuring of legal risk.
These experiences confirmed my interest in this field and motivate me to pursue a career at a leading global firm like Willkie, where I would be challenged to think creatively, navigate complex and interesting commercial contexts, and develop the judgment required of an effective commercial lawyer.
Q2 - Please explain why you are applying to Willkie.
Max 250 words
Firstly, I am drawn to Willkie’s dual strengths in transactional and contentious work, reflected in Chambers rankings for PE buyouts and investment funds, alongside Band-1 recognition in competition litigation and growing strength in arbitration and commercial disputes. Having topped my year in (finance module), I am attracted to Willkie’s integrated PE, finance and capital markets practices, which regularly work on innovative and impactful transactional mandates like Belfius Bank’s recent €500m sustainability-linked green notes issuance. Simultaneously, placing in the Top 8 of 120+ teams at the (University) Negotiation Competition–where success depended on distilling complex arguments and advocating persuasively under pressure–highlighted the appeal of contentious work. At Willkie, I could experience the top end of both areas, developing a holistic understanding of how lawyers structure, negotiate and contest deals and disputes.
Secondly, I am attracted to Willkie’s rapid growth and entrepreneurial culture. The London office has expanded at exceptional speed, doubling its lawyer headcount between 2017 and 2025 while delivering double-digit revenue growth year-on-year. As Hiral Jain noted at an Open Evening, this scale of expansion necessitates lean, high-leverage teams and an emphasis on junior responsibility. This environment suits how I work: at (Non MBB Consulting Firm), taking initiative and actively seeking feedback led to strong relationships and being entrusted to support a Director on a Third-Party Risk Management project. This reinforced the value of a self-starter mindset early in a career, and I am confident my proactive approach would allow me to thrive at Willkie.
My stats are: graduate, 2.1 from a target university (2.2 in first year, but mitigating circumstances related to physical health), various open days/1 first year scheme.
Also got rejected from Skadden at the first stage and HSFK at the app review stage
Would be really thankful on points to improve/change; am I missing anything?
I thought I wrote a pretty solid app, could anyone critique it and see what might have been the issue? Thank you.
Q1 - Please explain why you would like a career in commercial law.
Max 250 words
I am motivated by intellectually demanding environments where issues are complex and stakes are high. As a national-level debater, I thrived on analysing dense material under time pressure, anticipating counterarguments, and adapting strategy in real time. Alongside this, founding a small (redacted) business sparked a strong interest in commerce and how relationships shape business outcomes. Commercial law therefore appeals to me because it combines these interests, requiring lawyers to strategically analyse legal risks in achieving their clients’ commercial objectives.
My commitment to this career path has been consistent and long-standing. Before university, I interned in the corporate practice of (law firm), a leading (non-UK) full-service law firm. Despite having to relocate to another state, I seized this opportunity to gain practical experience and developed rapport with a partner by producing high-quality due diligence reports, ultimately securing a letter of recommendation. At university, a first-year scheme with (large US firm)–particularly a panel on cross-border project finance–highlighted how commercial judgement and contractual protections are essential to managing regulatory and investment risk. I later saw this in practice as a summer analyst at (Boutique PE fund), where reviewing investment covenants highlighted the importance of lawyers’ role in preserving investor confidence through the structuring of legal risk.
These experiences confirmed my interest in this field and motivate me to pursue a career at a leading global firm like Willkie, where I would be challenged to think creatively, navigate complex and interesting commercial contexts, and develop the judgment required of an effective commercial lawyer.
Q2 - Please explain why you are applying to Willkie.
Max 250 words
Firstly, I am drawn to Willkie’s dual strengths in transactional and contentious work, reflected in Chambers rankings for PE buyouts and investment funds, alongside Band-1 recognition in competition litigation and growing strength in arbitration and commercial disputes. Having topped my year in (finance module), I am attracted to Willkie’s integrated PE, finance and capital markets practices, which regularly work on innovative and impactful transactional mandates like Belfius Bank’s recent €500m sustainability-linked green notes issuance. Simultaneously, placing in the Top 8 of 120+ teams at the (University) Negotiation Competition–where success depended on distilling complex arguments and advocating persuasively under pressure–highlighted the appeal of contentious work. At Willkie, I could experience the top end of both areas, developing a holistic understanding of how lawyers structure, negotiate and contest deals and disputes.
Secondly, I am attracted to Willkie’s rapid growth and entrepreneurial culture. The London office has expanded at exceptional speed, doubling its lawyer headcount between 2017 and 2025 while delivering double-digit revenue growth year-on-year. As Hiral Jain noted at an Open Evening, this scale of expansion necessitates lean, high-leverage teams and an emphasis on junior responsibility. This environment suits how I work: at (Non MBB Consulting Firm), taking initiative and actively seeking feedback led to strong relationships and being entrusted to support a Director on a Third-Party Risk Management project. This reinforced the value of a self-starter mindset early in a career, and I am confident my proactive approach would allow me to thrive at Willkie.
My stats are: graduate, 2.1 from a target university (2.2 in first year, but mitigating circumstances related to physical health), various open days/1 first year scheme.
Also got rejected from Skadden at the first stage and HSFK at the app review stage
Would be really thankful on points to improve/change; am I missing anything?
Congratulations on the AC invite!!
To answer your question (in a very typical lawyer fashion), it depends! Last cycle I was able to move a summer scheme to a spring scheme, as I had been offered a scheme that clashed with one I had already accepted. However, some firms might not be able to accommodate any changes if they have already filled all the spots for the schemes and people aren’t able to move.
However, I would definitely encourage you to reach out and ask as soon as you can! By asking early, this increases the chances that you might be able to move to a different scheme, particularly if it is one later in the year. Alternatively, if they’ve already recruited for the scheme you’d like to move to, you may be able to swap with a candidate on the later scheme who is able to do your original scheme.
There’s absolutely no harm in asking, so I would just send a polite email to the graduate recruitment team to explain the situation. Given that most firms run their vacation schemes at similar times, this is something that they will be used to and they’re likely to try and find a way to accommodate where possible.
Best of luck with the AC!
For the work exp section, I have 7 jobs I have put down - all of these are paid jobs. I have been working for a few years since graduating and now looking for TCs. I graduated 4 years ago - from experience does anyone know if it is worth putting down societies etc at uni - I only haven't so far because I thought I didn't want to overkill the form so only really put down the most 'impressive' things legal/non-legal. Thanks!
Hi @floral.tcla
For more general VI advice, feel free to have a look at the link below:
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
milbank ac ! relatedly- when vac schemes clash what are firms’ general response for moving to a scheme later in the year? I know this will vary firm to firm but does anyone have any idea?
www.thecorporatelawacademy.com
From what you have said, it seems like the questions will be situational and will focus on assessing particular competencies through each situation.
In relation to your question regarding how the firm will distinguish between candidates, the firm will probably be looking at (1) how you think logically to identify the issues and overcome the specific situation in question and (2) how you deliver your answer i.e., speaking clearly, concisely and following a structure to ensure the listener can easily follow your thought process.
On a side note, I always found that there is generally no right or wrong answer as long as you stick to the issues highlighted in the question and the SRA's guidelines i.e., maintaining client confidentiality etc. For me, being creative and unique in your approach always helps stand out.
Best of luck! 👍
Hi I think you could request one on one session with TCLA team if you're in doubt (I never done that yet) but I can give you some advice:Hi guys, I was unfortunately rejected from Willkie at the first stage
I thought I wrote a pretty solid app, could anyone critique it and see what might have been the issue? Thank you.
Q1 - Please explain why you would like a career in commercial law.
Max 250 words
I am motivated by intellectually demanding environments where issues are complex and stakes are high. As a national-level debater, I thrived on analysing dense material under time pressure, anticipating counterarguments, and adapting strategy in real time. Alongside this, founding a small (redacted) business sparked a strong interest in commerce and how relationships shape business outcomes. Commercial law therefore appeals to me because it combines these interests, requiring lawyers to strategically analyse legal risks in achieving their clients’ commercial objectives.
My commitment to this career path has been consistent and long-standing. Before university, I interned in the corporate practice of (law firm), a leading (non-UK) full-service law firm. Despite having to relocate to another state, I seized this opportunity to gain practical experience and developed rapport with a partner by producing high-quality due diligence reports, ultimately securing a letter of recommendation. At university, a first-year scheme with (large US firm)–particularly a panel on cross-border project finance–highlighted how commercial judgement and contractual protections are essential to managing regulatory and investment risk. I later saw this in practice as a summer analyst at (Boutique PE fund), where reviewing investment covenants highlighted the importance of lawyers’ role in preserving investor confidence through the structuring of legal risk.
These experiences confirmed my interest in this field and motivate me to pursue a career at a leading global firm like Willkie, where I would be challenged to think creatively, navigate complex and interesting commercial contexts, and develop the judgment required of an effective commercial lawyer.
Q2 - Please explain why you are applying to Willkie.
Max 250 words
Firstly, I am drawn to Willkie’s dual strengths in transactional and contentious work, reflected in Chambers rankings for PE buyouts and investment funds, alongside Band-1 recognition in competition litigation and growing strength in arbitration and commercial disputes. Having topped my year in (finance module), I am attracted to Willkie’s integrated PE, finance and capital markets practices, which regularly work on innovative and impactful transactional mandates like Belfius Bank’s recent €500m sustainability-linked green notes issuance. Simultaneously, placing in the Top 8 of 120+ teams at the (University) Negotiation Competition–where success depended on distilling complex arguments and advocating persuasively under pressure–highlighted the appeal of contentious work. At Willkie, I could experience the top end of both areas, developing a holistic understanding of how lawyers structure, negotiate and contest deals and disputes.
Secondly, I am attracted to Willkie’s rapid growth and entrepreneurial culture. The London office has expanded at exceptional speed, doubling its lawyer headcount between 2017 and 2025 while delivering double-digit revenue growth year-on-year. As Hiral Jain noted at an Open Evening, this scale of expansion necessitates lean, high-leverage teams and an emphasis on junior responsibility. This environment suits how I work: at (Non MBB Consulting Firm), taking initiative and actively seeking feedback led to strong relationships and being entrusted to support a Director on a Third-Party Risk Management project. This reinforced the value of a self-starter mindset early in a career, and I am confident my proactive approach would allow me to thrive at Willkie.
My stats are: graduate, 2.1 from a target university (2.2 in first year, but mitigating circumstances related to physical health), various open days/1 first year scheme.
Also got rejected from Skadden at the first stage and HSFK at the app review stage
Would be really thankful on points to improve/change; am I missing anything?
• Choose commercial topic or news to highlight your interest specifically, how you think it reflects your background, eg. copyright infringement, bribery, which relates to Litigation strong firms like this.
• Pick a deal that resonate with your experience, as you won debate and negotiation competition you should connect with a deal with strong contentious work, rather than transactional. I think you should understand that this firm is not PE heavy and transactional focus like Kirkland, Paul, Weiss, etc
• Mention why London office! I think rather than focus on the culture, you should highlight more on this aspect
• Avoid emdash or contractions at American firm like Willkie, they are aware of AI usage and in fact not compromised any use of AI like other innovative firms like TW or Goodwin
• Paragraphs length, usually good writer writes 24-30 words (3 sentences in paragraph) to look it more aesthetic and readable to skim
Last edited:
I think your interest in commercial law might be a bit too broad? In the sense that, your reasoning is very much based in the stuff you've done rather than stuff you like about commercial areas. I tend to talk about commercial law specific things and link it back to why it interests me (not the other way around).Hi guys, I was unfortunately rejected from Willkie at the first stage
I thought I wrote a pretty solid app, could anyone critique it and see what might have been the issue? Thank you.
Q1 - Please explain why you would like a career in commercial law.
Max 250 words
I am motivated by intellectually demanding environments where issues are complex and stakes are high. As a national-level debater, I thrived on analysing dense material under time pressure, anticipating counterarguments, and adapting strategy in real time. Alongside this, founding a small (redacted) business sparked a strong interest in commerce and how relationships shape business outcomes. Commercial law therefore appeals to me because it combines these interests, requiring lawyers to strategically analyse legal risks in achieving their clients’ commercial objectives.
My commitment to this career path has been consistent and long-standing. Before university, I interned in the corporate practice of (law firm), a leading (non-UK) full-service law firm. Despite having to relocate to another state, I seized this opportunity to gain practical experience and developed rapport with a partner by producing high-quality due diligence reports, ultimately securing a letter of recommendation. At university, a first-year scheme with (large US firm)–particularly a panel on cross-border project finance–highlighted how commercial judgement and contractual protections are essential to managing regulatory and investment risk. I later saw this in practice as a summer analyst at (Boutique PE fund), where reviewing investment covenants highlighted the importance of lawyers’ role in preserving investor confidence through the structuring of legal risk.
These experiences confirmed my interest in this field and motivate me to pursue a career at a leading global firm like Willkie, where I would be challenged to think creatively, navigate complex and interesting commercial contexts, and develop the judgment required of an effective commercial lawyer.
Q2 - Please explain why you are applying to Willkie.
Max 250 words
Firstly, I am drawn to Willkie’s dual strengths in transactional and contentious work, reflected in Chambers rankings for PE buyouts and investment funds, alongside Band-1 recognition in competition litigation and growing strength in arbitration and commercial disputes. Having topped my year in (finance module), I am attracted to Willkie’s integrated PE, finance and capital markets practices, which regularly work on innovative and impactful transactional mandates like Belfius Bank’s recent €500m sustainability-linked green notes issuance. Simultaneously, placing in the Top 8 of 120+ teams at the (University) Negotiation Competition–where success depended on distilling complex arguments and advocating persuasively under pressure–highlighted the appeal of contentious work. At Willkie, I could experience the top end of both areas, developing a holistic understanding of how lawyers structure, negotiate and contest deals and disputes.
Secondly, I am attracted to Willkie’s rapid growth and entrepreneurial culture. The London office has expanded at exceptional speed, doubling its lawyer headcount between 2017 and 2025 while delivering double-digit revenue growth year-on-year. As Hiral Jain noted at an Open Evening, this scale of expansion necessitates lean, high-leverage teams and an emphasis on junior responsibility. This environment suits how I work: at (Non MBB Consulting Firm), taking initiative and actively seeking feedback led to strong relationships and being entrusted to support a Director on a Third-Party Risk Management project. This reinforced the value of a self-starter mindset early in a career, and I am confident my proactive approach would allow me to thrive at Willkie.
My stats are: graduate, 2.1 from a target university (2.2 in first year, but mitigating circumstances related to physical health), various open days/1 first year scheme.
Also got rejected from Skadden at the first stage and HSFK at the app review stage
Would be really thankful on points to improve/change; am I missing anything?
Hi everyone, I am very grateful to be in a position where I have two AC's. However, they are both next month and I am quite stressed about them. Does anyone have any tips on how to deal with nerves? I believe my nerves are what ultimately get in the way. I need to stay calm somehow. Any tips would be greatly appreciated!
Hey so the advice I got for my AC this year was to treat it like a mock interview rather than the real thing - this allows you to come across more authentic and at ease rather than blanking due to nerves. I know it’s easier said than done, but truly calming down helps a lot with performance (speaking from experience)
I also find just engaging with the other candidates there helps me forget about my stress a little haha
And congratulations on your two ACs that’s amazing!
Heya! Obviously ways of dealing with nerves differ for everyone but I’ve found a great way for me to is to try and internalise that being invited to which ever stage it is means I genuinely am good enough, and that I should go into it thinking I’m right for the job/role rather than stressing about getting things wrong! Waaaay easier said than done but it’s all in your head at the end of the day
congratulations and good luck for the ACs! I personally started doing the 5 minute guided meditations on yt and they're actually helping me with my nerves 😭
Thanks for your reply.
Could you share some examples of the commercial law specific things you mentioned and how you linked them back to your interests?My approach to these questions is generally 1. As someone who has yet to join the industry I couldn't reasonably have experience with the more specific/technical things commercial lawyers do 2. Therefore it's better to focus on general transferable skills and broad strokes (interest in business, textual analysis, drafting, advocacy, etc.).
Would appreciate a different view on how to tackle these Q's.
I got the offer last year. i think they have changed it this year but i would say:
1. Have your motivations very clear and lots of examples of competencies- they really value a breadth of experiences. Be sure to really understand the role of a trainee in terms of the challenges, tasks, opportunities etc.
2. For the case study make sure you know the mna process inside out as well as understand key provisions in a term sheet/SPA agreeement and how to negotiate them
3. Stay calm under pressure and try and get the interviewers to prompt you- if unsure say ' this is what i think am i along the right tracks'
4. We didnt have a written task last year it was a email which was then used in your interview but didnt really matter it was more about what you said in the interview.
5. they sell themselves on their organic growth in the us, focus on developing of in house legal tech tools, mna capabilities, capacity to carry out non commoditised work and being towards the lockstep side of the pay structure which naturally incentivises cross border and cross team collaboration
Congratulations! I was under the impression that Milbank is non-rolling, is that still the case?
Similar threads
- Sticky
