• Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
656
608
Hi guys! I'm currently writing my application for DWF's vac scheme; one of the questions is as follows:

"What are your motivations for wanting to pursue a career as a Solicitor at DWF?"

Am I right to interpret this question as essentially meaning "why DWF", as opposed to "why a career as a solicitor in general, and then why DWF"?

If anyone has any advice, I'd be hugely grateful! :)
Hello!

You're right that the emphasis is very much on why DWF, but I would still try to strike a balance between the two. For example, a good approach could be:
  1. Briefly explain why you want to be a solicitor (with reference to skills you have, elements of the role you enjoy, the type of work, client focus, problem-solving, etc.)
  2. Spend the majority of your answer on why those motivations specifically align with DWF - for example, its sectors, client base, culture, international reach, and the kind of work that trainees have the opportunity to complete.
It might help to think of it as "why I want to be a solicitor in this environment / at this firm". As long as your motivations for becoming a solicitor clearly feeds into why DWF is the right fit, you'll be addressing the whole question :)
 
  • 🏆
Reactions: pfoapplicant

radssss

Legendary Member
Aug 16, 2024
361
478
Might be a stupid qs but if a firm sponsors a commercial awareness competition (like Aspiring solicitors, BIUCAC etc), would it be fair to assume the firm places a high emphasis on commercial awareness in its recruitment process?
Yes because the person who wins it gets vs offers from the firms who sponsor which naturally means they place very high emphasis on commercial awareness. Anyways most firms do now days anyways :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: vweewcvew
Seems to be another one of those days! Macfarlanes PFO after submitting 2nd stage on the 1st of December. Congrats to all those who got through to AC and chins up to everyone else who is eligible to apply to the DTC in Jan! Get those applications ready!
Harvey Spectre and Jessica Pearson both liking my post. Should I make an application for name partner?
 

FutureTrainee213

Active Member
Dec 18, 2025
12
18
Might be a stupid qs but if a firm sponsors a commercial awareness competition (like Aspiring solicitors, BIUCAC etc), would it be fair to assume the firm places a high emphasis on commercial awareness in its recruitment process?
Perhaps the process is different across a lot of firms, but when I was working in graduate recruitment, we sponsored the commercial awareness competition. However, this was not because we were particularly looking for candidates with commercial awareness but rather more to do with branding, as AS had a massive target pool of potential candidates that we wanted to attract as we wanted more applications for our roles.

This is usually the main reason why firms tend to sponsor events, it’s all about branding (which feeds into award season). So I wouldn’t read too much into what they’re sponsoring during the course of the year, it’s less to do with the candidates and more to do with recruitment strategy. E.G sponsoring events like Legal Cheek/Aspiring Solicitors is all about numbers, and sponsoring university societies is all about demographic.

That being said, being a part of their sponsored events such as competitions/talks - is only going to help you if you learn something, develop skills and explain it well in your application (unless you win it and obtain a VS). It’s not a guaranteed path to success and when they ask you about it in the “What source most helped you in applying to this role” - those questions (for me anyway) were never targeted at prioritising candidates, but more to do with realising if there was an ROI from what they were paying for that year and if they’d do it again.
 
  • Like
  • ℹ️
Reactions: floral.tcla and Jaysen
Having seen a lot of PFOs on the forum recently, and having had my fair share as well, I thought I’d share this in case it helps uplift anyone.

Skadden was always my dream firm, so when I got rejected, it hurt, especially because I put so much effort into my application. I was really disappointed, but as this is my first cycle, I made it a goal to stay as positive as possible regardless of any news I receive from firms.

The day after my Skadden rejection, I had an AC at Osborne Clarke. That’s how brutal this process can be. Regardless, I picked myself up, continued to prepare, and it ended up going very well.

This process can be incredibly hard and draining, but I’ve found that trying to stay positive where possible really does help. You genuinely never know what will happen if you keep believing in yourself and pushing forward. If you’re feeling down about not being progressed, I promise your time will come. Keep working on what you can control and don’t give up.

Good luck to everyone for the rest of this cycle. I hope it works out for us all 🤞
Well done! Which OC office was the AC in?
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.