• Get Everything You Need to Secure a Training Contract
    Now half the price. Join TCLA Premium for £30/month and get step-by-step application support, daily commercial awareness practice, and 700+ successful examples of past applications and interview experiences. Plus so much more.
    Join Premium →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

Do you think it would disadvantage an applicant to have business and work experience within the political ecosystem itself? I have worked for MPs and have a political consultancy, although I'm very careful about the way I frame these (Strictly parliamentary procedure/constituency work and the business/legal admin involved in running a business)... I hope it's not seen as an automatic rejection to have worked with politicians?
Definitely not! Sorry to alarm I was referring to American politics specifically :)
 
  • 🤝
Reactions: Shiv Lawy
Hi everyone!

I have applied to Hill Dickinson LLP (Manchester office), and completed the online assessment (Amberjack & recorded interview) on the 5th of January.

Does anyone have any idea of when roughly to expect any information regarding the Assessment Centre? Or the average time I can expect to hear back from them regarding this, as I know they recruit on a rolling basis 🧐

Many thanks in advance!
 

Harvey Specter

Legendary Member
Jul 4, 2024
914
3,377
My understanding from my WE (at US firm) is that political talk is pretty much banned among staff at US firms - for me personally I wouldn't bring it up in an interview
Cooley must be gangsta then cos at the open day the partners and associates were firing shots at the administration at every opportunity they could find. They brought up representing Jenner & Block in fighting against their executive order and how they are still standing for DEI as a firm unlike others firms (names were mentioned as well lmfao). 😭

Snoop Dogg Gang GIF by MOODMAN
 

Novaa

Distinguished Member
Dec 2, 2022
66
253
Cooley must be gangsta then cos at the open day the partners and associates were firing shots at the administration at every opportunity they could find and made the point about representing Jenner & Block in fighting against the executive order and how they are still standing for DEI as a firm unlike others firms (names were mentioned as well haha).

Snoop Dogg Gang GIF by MOODMAN

Wait but I love when Firms throw shade at eachother! I be sat in the corner writing my notes like 🤭

Wendy Williams Meme GIF
 

jamieclarke

Distinguished Member
Dec 30, 2021
60
61
Do you think it would disadvantage an applicant to have business and work experience within the political ecosystem itself? I have worked for MPs and have a political consultancy, although I'm very careful about the way I frame these (Strictly parliamentary procedure/constituency work and the business/legal admin involved in running a business)... I hope it's not seen as an automatic rejection to have worked with politicians?
I refer to my committee role with Labour Society in applications and have done for many years.

I got told before that political roles involving mainstream parties are fine (Labour, Tories LibDem) - but to avoid political positions that relate to more outward views (Marxism etc - popular at universities I believe!)

Although I have always held the belief to refrain putting this on apps for US law firm - just because I view them as being more right leaning and the smaller firms more left leaning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shiv Lawy
Cooley must be gangsta then cos at the open day the partners and associates were firing shots at the administration at every opportunity they could find. They brought up representing Jenner & Block in fighting against their executive order and how they are still standing for DEI as a firm unlike others firms (names were mentioned as well lmfao). 😭

Snoop Dogg Gang GIF by MOODMAN
Not gangsta, but democrats! Cooley and Jenner are west coast based just like Perkins Coie, so they are literally against Trump.Only Ashurst and TW, the UK Law firms that merge with another donkey - Midwest (Winston & Strawn).

Yankee and Yeehaw law firms are likely republican, so it's better not to talk about em on app and interview. A&O, HSF, and Hogan merge with em sadly...
 
Last edited:
  • ℹ️
Reactions: Harvey Specter

lividowl03

Standard Member
Dec 2, 2025
8
30
Am I tweaking or are Reed Smith reviewing applications not based on when theyre submitted (maybe alphabetically??)

Seen people who applied on deadline get progressed/rejected, and subsequently people that applied before the deadline get progressed/rejected. Super confused on their approach to reviewing…

I attended one of the application webinars they hosted and somebody asked something similar. Rik Palmer, one of the grad rec team bascially described it as they categorise people at each stage of the process. He didn't go into too much detail but essentially something like Exceptional, Very Good, Good, Average, Poor. etc.

E.g like this. Person A applied in September, Person B applied in November. Person A had a 'Good' written application' so they're put on hold for a bit. Person B has an 'Exceptional' so even though they applied two months later, they're progressed to test + VI straight away. But now Person B had a 'Poor' SJT + VI performance, so they are rejected/put on hold, and they'll now go back to Person A and progress them through etc.

He specifically mentioned plenty of people categorised lower at application stage, make it through the whole process and secure places on the scheme, because they perform well on the other components. It's generally a matter of waiting until higher scoring people progress/fail. Hence why some people have vac scheme offers, and some people have been waiting for months. Not a great feeling of course, but does not = PFO at all.
 

BobThebIlly

Legendary Member
Premium Member
Dec 6, 2024
206
351
Just did Goodwin oh boy... I should've taken this one out to the lake district too lmfao

ahhhhhh I lit sounded like a frog crocking in half of them omds

Also, can someone reassure me please? I wasn’t able to finish the first question properly, so my third and final point ended up being only around two sentences long.

I also finished with around 20 seconds remaining on the timer for the other questions. Is that a bad sign?
 

spamelinazoid

Legendary Member
  • Dec 19, 2021
    261
    400
    I attended one of the application webinars they hosted and somebody asked something similar. Rik Palmer, one of the grad rec team bascially described it as they categorise people at each stage of the process. He didn't go into too much detail but essentially something like Exceptional, Very Good, Good, Average, Poor. etc.

    E.g like this. Person A applied in September, Person B applied in November. Person A had a 'Good' written application' so they're put on hold for a bit. Person B has an 'Exceptional' so even though they applied two months later, they're progressed to test + VI straight away. But now Person B had a 'Poor' SJT + VI performance, so they are rejected/put on hold, and they'll now go back to Person A and progress them through etc.

    He specifically mentioned plenty of people categorised lower at application stage, make it through the whole process and secure places on the scheme, because they perform well on the other components. It's generally a matter of waiting until higher scoring people progress/fail. Hence why some people have vac scheme offers, and some people have been waiting for months. Not a great feeling of course, but does not = PFO at all.
    Oh wow that’s so interesting, thanks for typing all that. Good to know!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: baj5

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

    Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.