Hello!for DLA Q2, Select one article from DLA Piper Insights page on a client sector that interests you. How does it align with your personal and professional ambitions? (Max 200 words/1,500 Characters), i want to discuss an energy/aviation deal that they advised on about a year ago.
for the professional ambitions part of the q, i was thinking of highlighting the broader range of work DLA conducts in the aviation sphere. I know NRF CC conduct a lot of aviation finance mandates, whilst DLA offer insurance, regulatory, structuring and finance as well.
Is it ok to say something like 'this would provide broader exposure than finance-focused competitors such as NRF and CC, allowing me to explore my interest in this sector holistically'?
or is not a good idea to name drop competitors and keep it general.
would appreciate any advice from @Amma Usman or anyone else, thank you in advance!!
I think your point about DLA Piper’s broader aviation work is really strong, and shows that you have done your research on the firm. However, I’d suggest keeping it general rather than naming other firms like NRF or CC directly. For example:
“This would offer broader exposure than firms focused primarily on aviation finance, allowing me to explore the sector holistically through regulatory work, insurance, and complex structuring”
By adopting this approach, you keep the focus on DLA Piper’s strengths without making direct comparisons. In general, firms prefer when you centre your answer around what attracts you to them (rather than why others might fall short).
I hope that all makes sense!