• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

I don’t mean to get soppy on here, but does anyone have some tips on how to deal with rejection? This is my first proper VS application cycle (I’ve applied to a handful previously but didn’t take it as seriously as I am now) and two firms that I really love have rejected me lol. They were the ones at the top of my list. I know it’s not a personal thing and I know it’s competitive, but how do you all motivate yourselves to push through despite the inevitable rejections you encounter along the way? Would love any advice😅x
To be honest, I've felt somewhat validated over the past year because law firms haven't exactly practiced what they've preached.

You can probably guess what I'm alluding to here which does make me feel somewhat better lol.
 
Is referring to Paul Weiss’s developing litigation practice and wanting to learn more about this in relation to core practice areas, as one of 4 points in an open day application an immediate red flag. Some people have said this would be enough to get an application binned and why would Paul Weiss offer an open day to someone who mentioned litigation (no matter how briefly) over candidates who mentioned PE, even though PE is mentioned elsewhere in the application and among other points?
Hello!

I would agree with other forum users on this point - I don't think that mentioning Paul, Weiss' developing litigation practice is a red flag in itself, especially if it is framed in a way that shows genuine awareness of the firm's broader strategy and focus areas. I think it is important to mention that you are also interested in the firm's core strengths (e.g. private equity), but as you have stated that you do mention an interest in this, I can't imagine mentioning litigation would be a problem :)

If you positioned it as one of several points (for example, acknowledging the firm's elite transactional work while expressing curiosity about how it's building out its litigation practice) I think this shows good commercial awareness. It shows you understand the firm's expansion and want to see how that integrates with its core practice areas.

As long as your application shows an interest in Paul, Weiss for its current strengths as well, it's unlikely your application will get binned for mentioning their growing litigation practice!
 
What are you alluding to?
I’m not quite sure haha, please do enlighten me
Hint: Paul, Weiss was heavily criticized for being the first firm to do this.

I'm not naive and I realize that law firms have to face commercial realities but it made me feel that values really are quite hollow when push came to shove. I guess it makes me feel better when I get rejected but I'd also face commercial reality myself if I was offered a role at a firm like Paul, Weiss as I would be the first to accept with really no qualms about it :)
 
I don’t mean to get soppy on here, but does anyone have some tips on how to deal with rejection? This is my first proper VS application cycle (I’ve applied to a handful previously but didn’t take it as seriously as I am now) and two firms that I really love have rejected me lol. They were the ones at the top of my list. I know it’s not a personal thing and I know it’s competitive, but how do you all motivate yourselves to push through despite the inevitable rejections you encounter along the way? Would love any advice😅x
Hey

I totally get where you're coming from - it really does sting, even when you know it's not personal at all. It's hard not to feel deflated after putting so much effort in, especially at firms you were most excited about.

I would really echo the sentiment from other forum users that rejection is redirection - I was devastated after each application I didn't progress for or VS I didn't convert but ultimately, I've ended up with a TC at the firm that is genuinely the best fit for me. Rejection doesn't mean you're not good enough - it just means that you weren't the right fit for that specific process at that time, and there are so many factors that go into these processes that have nothing to do with your potential or capability.

I think it's important to try to reframe it as part of the learning curve rather than setback. Each application makes you sharper and more confident - you start understanding how to tailor it better, communicate more clearly, and really refine your narrative and profile as a candidate. Even if it doesn't feel that way right now, you are learning and getting closer with every application. It's okay to take a breather before diving back in, and you can come back with more perspective and energy.

Everyone who eventually lands a VS or TC has had their fair share of "no's" along the way (and I've had more than I can count!). The most important thing in this competitive process is to remain reflective and resilient - all you need is that one yes!

You're clearly putting in the work and care - that will pay off! Sending lots of good vibes and encouragement your way, and we'll be here to cheer you on :)
 
Hey

I totally get where you're coming from - it really does sting, even when you know it's not personal at all. It's hard not to feel deflated after putting so much effort in, especially at firms you were most excited about.

I would really echo the sentiment from other forum users that rejection is redirection - I was devastated after each application I didn't progress for or VS I didn't convert but ultimately, I've ended up with a TC at the firm that is genuinely the best fit for me. Rejection doesn't mean you're not good enough - it just means that you weren't the right fit for that specific process at that time, and there are so many factors that go into these processes that have nothing to do with your potential or capability.

I think it's important to try to reframe it as part of the learning curve rather than setback. Each application makes you sharper and more confident - you start understanding how to tailor it better, communicate more clearly, and really refine your narrative and profile as a candidate. Even if it doesn't feel that way right now, you are learning and getting closer with every application. It's okay to take a breather before diving back in, and you can come back with more perspective and energy.

Everyone who eventually lands a VS or TC has had their fair share of "no's" along the way (and I've had more than I can count!). The most important thing in this competitive process is to remain reflective and resilient - all you need is that one yes!

You're clearly putting in the work and care - that will pay off! Sending lots of good vibes and encouragement your way, and we'll be here to cheer you on :)
Thank you so much Abbie!!
 
  • 🤝
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Is referring to Paul Weiss’s developing litigation practice and wanting to learn more about this in relation to core practice areas, as one of 4 points in an open day application an immediate red flag. Some people have said this would be enough to get an application binned and why would Paul Weiss offer an open day to someone who mentioned litigation (no matter how briefly) over candidates who mentioned PE, even though PE is mentioned elsewhere in the application and among other points?
Similar to everyone else, I don't think this is an issue. I've submitted a 2nd application for the Open Day with significant changes this time and one of those changes includes noting their stated objective of providing a full-service offering in London which inevitably includes Litigation.

I think it's also been reported in a few places that there's been a shift among PE firms towards hiring one firm for almost everything to save costs rather than hiring one firm for finance and M&A, another for antitrust, and another for tax/employment on a single transaction. At the very least, it was part of a discussion I recently had with a structured finance partner at CC at an event two weeks ago.
 
  • 🤝
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Similar to everyone else, I don't think this is an issue. I've submitted a 2nd application for the Open Day with significant changes this time and one of those changes includes noting their stated objective of providing a full-service offering in London which inevitably includes Litigation.

I think it's also been reported in a few places that there's been a shift among PE firms towards hiring one firm for almost everything to save costs rather than hiring one firm for finance and M&A, another for antitrust, and another for tax/employment on a single transaction. At the very least, it was part of a discussion I recently had with a structured finance partner at CC at an event two weeks ago.
Thank you so much for this insight!!!
 
Weil test invite.
Happy Season 5 GIF by Friends
 
Hint: Paul, Weiss was heavily criticized for being the first firm to do this.

I'm not naive and I realize that law firms have to face commercial realities but it made me feel that values really are quite hollow when push came to shove. I guess it makes me feel better when I get rejected but I'd also face commercial reality myself if I was offered a role at a firm like Paul, Weiss as I would be the first to accept with really no qualms about it :)
struggled to understand what you were “alluding to” at so asked ChatGPT incase anyone else wanted to know !

IMG_2708.jpeg
 
(Regarding WGT)

Is having 70 percentile in Assessment day practice test, 68 in allaboutlaw, 70 in jobprep test and 68% in Clifford chance test decent enough practice for a timed WGT test?

Likely OK, but you should try pushing for an 80pct+ score (heard some firms cutoff around 70--buffer to be safe). Practice helps a ton; pattern recognition etc. I started around the 50/60th pct and after a few weeks of consistent practice managed 90pct+'s. That said, a strong WG score alone isn't enough, got 99th pct for Links last year but wasn't progressed past stage 1...

Love the pfp/user by the way. LOL
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.