- Sep 9, 2024
- 1,032
- 1,815
I would generally aim for two reasons at the expense of death of analysis, as recruiters will be well-aware that such a tight time limit will disable discussing anything but the headline point. That said, I think it can be fine to only present one point, provided that this is something of central importance to the firm and would by itself justify a strong interest in it. For instance, for Kirkland a single well-developed interest in PE point would likely do the job well here; but for Milbank, while the firm has good PE credentials, it probably wouldn't suffice.I would really appreciate anyone's thoughts on this. How many points would a firm expect you to include in why this firm question on a VI in a 60 second response? I've tried to include 2 points but after timing my response that's literally 3 sentences for each reason and they're not quite developed. Would it be okay to just mention one reason?