Hello!
I’d treat the question almost like a mini-essay - a simple structure that could work well is:
1. Introduction (1-2 sentences)
I’d start by briefly describing what you think defines an outstanding
Ropes & Gray lawyers - something that ties into their culture, their global platform, or their client-focused approach. This frames your three characteristics as part of a coherent picture rather than three random traits
2. Three characteristics (separate mini paragraphs)
For each one:
- State the characteristic clearly (it can be a soft skill or hard skill, and a mix of the two is likely to work really well)
- Explain why it matters at R&G (link it to the introduction and something real about the firm - e.g. their cross-border work, private equity strength, innovation, pro bono, etc.)
- Show how it drives the business (for example, how it helps deepen client relationships, improves efficiency, and supports growth in the key sectors)
This turns each characteristic into something commercial and tangible, not just descriptive
3. Short conclusion (1-2 sentences)
I’d end your answer by pulling the three traits together and reinforcing how they reflect the firm’s long-term strategy and how they will contribute to the future success of the firm. A sentence or two should be enough to achieve this!
As for your question - I can imagine that characteristics would include both hard and soft skills. The key is choosing ones that feel tailored to
Ropes & Gray, not just generic ”good lawyer” traits.
Good luck - it seems like a tough question, but it’s a really good opportunity to show insight!