Hey @Abbie Whitlock! I have an AC tomorrow and the case study is "strategy based" not M&A what should I focus on! Thank you in advance
-
TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.Join →
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
- Thread starter Ram Sabaratnam
- Start date
Hey!
I think this is a really thoughtful question, and shows that you are commercially aware and thinking about market trends.
It might help to slightly reframe it so it feels less like you are asking for a definitive answer on their strategy. Instead of directly asking whether they plan to merge, you could say something along the lines of: ”We have seen an increase In transatlantic mergers between UK and US firms - how does the firm view that trend, and how does it see its international strategy developing?”
This keeps it focused on strategy rather than speculating about the firms next moves, and invites the partner to talk about the long-term vision of the firm (and shows you are thinking about how the firm is a fit for your long-term career). I wouldn’t say it is too forward - just make sure that the tone is curious rather than probing
Hey!
It depends on the firm, but you absolutely can! I totally understand where you are coming from, as I also thought it was a requirement to have legal experience when applying for the direct route, but what matters most is that you write a strong application and perform well in the assessments.
From my understanding, there is usually a higher benchmark for DTC ACs and interviews (as they are only assessing you on that one day, compared to a week or two for a VS), but if you are confident in those exercises it is definitely worth a shot! There are a few people in my DTC cohort that had no prior legal experience, so it isn’t a prerequisite at most firms
Hey!
I would definitely agree with quality over quantity, especially when it comes to DTC applications. For me, it wasn’t about knowing everything about the firm before the AC (and I definitely didn’t prep as much as I would’ve liked to!), but knowing the right things well. The main areas that I aimed to be confident in were:
1. The firm‘s key practice areas and sector strengths
2. A couple of recent deals and cases from a mix of practice areas / sectors
3. The culture of the firm and what their training programme involves
4. Most importantly, why those points genuinely appealed to me based on my interests, past experiences, and future career goals.
In terms of time, I probably spent a few focused hours on research before the AC spread out over a few days. This was more beneficial to me than cramming the night before, and as I didn’t have loads of time to prepare, I focused on the key areas.
I wouldn’t necessarily say I ever felt like I “knew” the firm completely - I think the most important thing is to understand its market position and the key strengths that make it competitive, and ensure that you can demonstrate why the unique features of the firm appeal to you personally. This seemed to be enough!
I hope that assists!
Hey!
Two well-developed reasons that you can link to your personal experiences will work well! I would always aim for depth over number, and if you feel that the third point isn’t necessary, it is absolutely fine to stick to two. I would just make sure that you can:
- Clearly link each reason to the firm (i.e. avoid generic points), and
- Tie them to your own personal experiences or motivations
Would a firm having rankings in both contentious and transactional work be a unique enough selling point if I can relate it to my personal choices? And also include an interesting deal and a case in the same?Hey!
Two well-developed reasons that you can link to your personal experiences will work well! I would always aim for depth over number, and if you feel that the third point isn’t necessary, it is absolutely fine to stick to two. I would just make sure that you can:
If you can do that and fill the word count, that should make a strong answer! Best of luck
- Clearly link each reason to the firm (i.e. avoid generic points), and
- Tie them to your own personal experiences or motivations
Hello!
Congratulations on being invited to the AC!
If it is strategy-based, I would focus on:
- Commercial Awareness: they want to see that you understand that businesses don’t operate in a vacuum. I would have a think about things such as market conditions, competitors, industry trends, etc., and apply them to the scenario you have been given. Even more basic points such as inflation and ESG pressure show that you are thinking commercially.
- Client’s Objectives: focus on what the business is actually trying to achieve. This might be growth, entering a new market, reducing costs, reputation management, diversifying, etc. If you are asked to make recommendations, they should always relate back to these goals. You are essentially being asked to provide legal advice that aligns with the business’ wider commercial strategy
- Risk Analysis: strategy will also involve showing that you can spot and weigh risks in a situation. This might be financial risks, reputational risks, regulatory risks, or operational risks. You won’t necessarily be expected to eliminate the risks - just make sure that you show that you can spot them and prioritise them accordingly.
- Clear Structure: as a more general tip, I would ensure that you construct your points in a clear and structured way. A simple structure could be: identify objectives, analyse options (i.e. the pros and cons), assess the risks, and make a recommendation.
- Practical and Decisive Recommendations: when you make recommendations at the end of the exercise, try to avoid sitting on the fence. It is completely fine to not give a completely definitive answer if the situation is unclear, but I would weigh up the options, choose one, and justify why you have chosen it. The best advice I was given during my placement year is that partners don’t want trainees to just highlight problems, they want trainees who can offer solutions and make decisions too.
Best of luck with the AC tomorrow - I’m sure you’ll do great!
Does anyone also have difficulty accessing some pages of Clyde & Co - not partiuclar articles but some of their services pages - my AC is tomorrow ☠️ e.g.,
https://www.clydeco.com › services › cyber-risk-expertise
https://www.clydeco.com › services › cyber-risk-expertise
V&E partner interview stage as well! If anyone has any insights into this stage from previous cycles, I'd be happy to exchange insights with other US and UK firms, including Dechert, Addleshaw Goddard, CMS, Latham & Watkins, Kirkland & Ellis, Forsters, Mills & Reeves, White & Case, etc!
Similar threads
- Sticky
