I honestly think this is such a non-issue. Unless a firm explicitly specifies they look for consistent 2.1s, I don’t think a firm will disregard your app when it’s stated they look for a 2.1 overall. Obviously better grades help, but degree marks are also not graded the same as say A-levels or GCSE’s are, so the value of a 2.1 differs depending on the uni. But it’s really not the be all and end all.I’ve got a few 2:2 modules too with mit circs and I’ve progressed with a few US firms post app like Akin, Debs, Gibson, Weil and Willkie (a few other firms too). Like you most of my modules are over 65% with a good number of 1sts, so I think these module marks are not gna look bad at all. It obvs depends on the wider app though whether you’ll progress beyond the initial app stage.