• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

trainee4u

Legendary Member
Sep 7, 2023
639
1,283
I don't usually comment on things like this, but this sounds intriguing. What was the outcome?

So just had my feedback call (PFO) and they said that I was steering the group away on several occasions and I should instead summarise the groupthink rather than doing that to ensure it's a group decision.

I felt this was a bit unfair, as the task was for a specific client base and this girl was waffling on very generally, but I guess thems the breaks if you're in a group that's not particularly effective.

I think I was probably PFOed more on the interview, but they said it was "holistic", not a score per component, so you couldn't really tell.
 

silonthesofa

Valued Member
Feb 7, 2025
116
107
So just had my feedback call (PFO) and they said that I was steering the group away on several occasions and I should instead summarise the groupthink rather than doing that to ensure it's a group decision.

I felt this was a bit unfair, as the task was for a specific client base and this girl was waffling on very generally, but I guess thems the breaks if you're in a group that's not particularly effective.

I think I was probably PFOed more on the interview, but they said it was "holistic", not a score per component, so you couldn't really tell.
Ugh, that really sucks. I'm sorry to hear! Sounds a lot like what someone I know got for their feedback too post group exercise. In that case, he strongly felt the group was making a mistake, but didn't manage to persuade them politically, so he went along with the group think and then for the feedback call, said all the rest of the performance was all great, it was just that one aspect of the group exercise that was wrong.

There's no winning in that case and you just take the bad luck of having gotten stuck with a bad group.
At the very least, I hope that girl didn't get an offer either!
 

AryanAgg

Valued Member
Dec 17, 2025
112
77
Ugh, that really sucks. I'm sorry to hear! Sounds a lot like what someone I know got for their feedback too post group exercise. In that case, he strongly felt the group was making a mistake, but didn't manage to persuade them politically, so he went along with the group think and then for the feedback call, said all the rest of the performance was all great, it was just that one aspect of the group exercise that was wrong.

There's no winning in that case and you just take the bad luck of having gotten stuck with a bad group.
At the very least, I hope that girl didn't get an offer either!
So they wanted him to persuade the group more?
 

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
979
1,113
Hi @Abbie Whitlock, I hope you’re well! I had a couple ofquestions as I’m preparing for my W&C interview, if that’s okay.

For my “Why W&C” answer, my first reason currently focuses on the firm’s strength in Corporate/M&A and its investment in private equity. Do you think that’s a sensible angle, given that it’s an area that the firm is actively building out and growing in, or would it be better to focus on areas it is stronger in and already particularly known for, such as project finance or capital markets?

My second reason focuses on the firm’s global reach and platform. Do you think two reasons are sufficient for this question, or would you recommend adding a third? For example, I was considering mentioning the guaranteed international secondment - would it make sense to include that within the global platform point, or is it better framed under training philosophy as a separate reason?

Also, when asked about practice areas I’m interested in, would it be better to stay aligned with my “Why W&C” answer and say Corporate/PE, or is it fine to say something different such as energy and litigation/arbitration? I’m just conscious of whether that might come across as inconsistent.

Sorry for the multiple questions, and thank you so much in advance for your help!
Hey!

I am well, thank you - hope you are too! Of course, more than happy to answer any questions :)

I'd say that focusing on Corporate / M&A and PE is a sensible angle, especially if you frame your answer around the firm's growth and investment in that area. You don't have to default to project finance or capital markets just because they are well known, and it shows that you are thinking about its long-term strategy, not just its historic strengths.

Two strong reasons should usually be enough! I'd keep global platform as one point and include the guaranteed international secondment within that, as evidence of how the global reach translates into training. Including more depth in your answer is more important than adding a third reason for the sake of it.

On practice areas, some alignment helps, but I wouldn't say it is completely necessary. You don't have to be rigid, but your interests should feel coherent alongside your reasons for choosing the firm. However, if you are able to explain why you are interested in energy or litigation / arbitration and can link this to your past experiences or what you hope to do in your future career, then I don't think this would come across as inconsistent. Ultimately, you will do multiple seats in your training contract, so it is a good idea to show that you are open-minded and interested in a few different areas.

Best of luck with your application! :)
 

ChambersLoading

Distinguished Member
Premium Member
Sep 12, 2022
57
83
Hey!

I am well, thank you - hope you are too! Of course, more than happy to answer any questions :)

I'd say that focusing on Corporate / M&A and PE is a sensible angle, especially if you frame your answer around the firm's growth and investment in that area. You don't have to default to project finance or capital markets just because they are well known, and it shows that you are thinking about its long-term strategy, not just its historic strengths.

Two strong reasons should usually be enough! I'd keep global platform as one point and include the guaranteed international secondment within that, as evidence of how the global reach translates into training. Including more depth in your answer is more important than adding a third reason for the sake of it.

On practice areas, some alignment helps, but I wouldn't say it is completely necessary. You don't have to be rigid, but your interests should feel coherent alongside your reasons for choosing the firm. However, if you are able to explain why you are interested in energy or litigation / arbitration and can link this to your past experiences or what you hope to do in your future career, then I don't think this would come across as inconsistent. Ultimately, you will do multiple seats in your training contract, so it is a good idea to show that you are open-minded and interested in a few different areas.

Best of luck with your application! :)
This is so sooo helpful!! Thank you very much :))
 
  • Love
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

Abbie Whitlock

Administrator
Staff member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 11, 2025
979
1,113
Can anyone help me with tips on how to prep for my AC next week? The assessed tasks are: document drafting assessment, group client pitch, group negotiation exercise and networking. I’m not sure where to start 🥲
Hey!

Congratulations on the AC invite! I have made a couple previous posts on some of the assessed tasks you have listed, so I will quote those below!

For the document drafting, I would practise structuring information clearly and concisely. For example, you could use headings, short paragraphs, and I would definitely ensure that you focus on answering the actual question they are asking. When you practise, it helps to always ask: "Have I addressed the client's objective? Have I prioritised the key issues rather than just describing everything?"

If you have any further questions, just let me know! :)

Hey!

Whilst I haven't completed a negotiation exercise at an AC before, I did complete one when I competed in BIUCAC and during my vacation scheme at Travers Smith, so I'm happy to share how I prepared for these!

I remember finding negotiation exercises really intimidating, but they feel slightly easier and less nerve-wracking once you are actually in it. The key thing to remember is that negotiations are much more about how you approach the discussion, rather than 'winning' or forcing the best deal. You should be looking to display traits such as collaboration, commercial awareness, and clear communication - definitely try to avoid things like aggression and stubbornness (which was slightly challenging for me as a naturally stubborn person haha 😅).

It is difficult to prepare for a negotiation exercise in advance of an AC, as it will depend a lot on the fact pattern itself. In terms of preparation on the day, make sure that you know your brief inside out. It is important to be really clear on your client's priorities, and break the factors down into:

1. What is essential for your client
2. What you are willing to negotiate (i.e. there is some leeway)
3. Areas that you are willing to compromise

It helps to have a think in advance about any potential trade-offs, so that you are not just saying yes or no but can suggest alternatives or offers to the other side that move the discussion forward.

During the exercise itself, focus on listening just as much as speaking. I would try to ask questions, acknowledge the other side's points, and explain your reasoning calmly. A good negotiation should feel constructive rather than adversarial, so make sure to keep the tone professional and solution-focused. If any new information comes up that wasn't included in your facts, show that you can adapt rather than sticking rigidly to what you prepared in advance - this is why it is important to have some areas you are willing to negotiate and compromise on.

Additionally, if it is a team negotiation, I found it really helpful to summarise the points that had been agreed as we went along. This helped for time management, as you want to ensure that you aren't staying stuck on one point for too long. If the negotiation has been stuck for a while, it might make sense to suggest that you move on to the next issue, and come back to the earlier point towards at the end.

One thing that I picked up on after speaking to the assessors at the negotiations I have taken part in is the importance of being realistic with your demands. For example, if your client is aiming for £100,000 for a company, it makes sense to open slightly higher to leave room for negotiate, but you should avoid going wildly overboard (e.g. suggesting £1,000,000). An unrealistic opening position can undermine your credibility and make it harder to build a constructive dialogue. A sensible and well-reasoned starting point shows commercial awareness and helps keep the negotiation collaborative overall.

If you have time to practise, you could have a go at doing a mock negotiation with a friend - even just getting comfortable structuring your points and responding under a bit of pressure can be really helpful. I'd also recommend that you familiarise yourself with concepts such as warranties, indemnities, etc. before the AC (if you haven't already), as these are things that are likely to be negotiated.

Overall, as long as you stay calm and continually aim to work towards a solution with the other side, you will be doing exactly what the graduate recruitment team want to see - even if you don't end up with the 'best' deal.

Best of luck!! :)

Hello!

This is a great question! I did something similar when I participated in BIUCAC, so I'm happy to share what worked for me then!

Generally, these presentations are less about listing everything the firm does, and more about showing that understand the client and what they need. I would structure it in the following way:

1. Opening

Briefly introduce yourself and the team and set out the purpose - why you are here and what you can help the client to achieve. I'd make sure to keep it confident and concise, and avoid rambling!

2. Demonstrate understanding

Show that you understand their commercial context, which can include key challenges in their sector, current market pressures, or what they're trying to achieve. This signals commercial awareness and that you have done your research!

3. Why this firm is the right adviser

This is probably the most important section, and I would focus on 3-4 tailored strengths of the firm that directly meet the clients needs. This could be relevant sector expertise, similar past transactions, cross-practice collaboration, international reach, partner involvement, etc. Make sure that you use specific examples and focus on how these features will help the client achieve what they want out of the transaction.

4. How you would work with them

It might help to briefly outline to the client what your approach would be - e.g. responsiveness, proactive risk management, cost transparency, etc. I'd make sure that you know the firms values and how it markets itself before the AC, as you could demonstrate those values.

5. Conclusion

End your answer by reinforcing how the firm will help them achieve their business objectives, utilise opportunities, and manage any risks in the transaction.

The key part is to avoid making it sounds like you are just listing features about the firm - you want to ensure that your pitch is client-focused and commercially aware.

I hope that assists! :)
 

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.