• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26

I was asked an interesting question during a law firm interview recently, and I'd be curious to know how other people might approach it...

The question was along the lines of: "If you were asked to support a client that worked in an ethically controversial, but legal, business, would you say yes?" There was nothing more specific than this, and so we had an opportunity to talk it through in front of the interviewers.

Obviously, the right and sensible answer to this, for pretty much everyone, I guess, would be: "It depends". It depends on what the client does. Their business could be anything from family planning to online betting apps, advertising CBD to manufacturing nuclear missiles. Some businesses are much more "ethically controversial" than others, and people will draw the line in different places based on their own beliefs and values. So it depends on (1) the character of the client's business, (2) how we personally feel about that specific activity, and (3) - for bonus points! - how it might affect the reputation of our law firm, relations to other clients, etc.

Now, saying the above is a pretty good answer to give in an interview, I think. But the interviewers wanted more than "It depends"; they pushed for a "yes" or "no", and - given the lack of any further information in order to make an informed decision - I went for "no".

How would you have responded to this question?

I see the logic in asking it, and the choice of answer is probably less important than the thinking out loud that comes before it. But do law firms look for people who play safe (and say "no" when faced with insufficient info), or display a willingness to support clients from any legally valid business (and say "yes").
I think I answered a similar one - I felt they wanted to hear that professional ethics are obviously paramount to practice as a solicitor (to the point unpaid parking tickets is an integrity issue) but also that a law firm is a commercial business so ultimately it’s whether you can see past your own subjective opinion on whether it’s ethical and be more objective about whether it would be the right choice for the firm based on its other clients/the opportunity the new client presents for the wider firm. Reputation is everything whether yours personally or the firms!

Interesting question though!
 
Hey everyone, long-time watcher, but this is my first post here because I have a bit of a dilemma.

I was very fortunate to be offered a training contract offer from a good city firm a few weeks ago. They gave me a month to accept, which now expires in 1 week, as I've been sitting on it for a while. This is because I also have an upcoming vacation scheme which starts on Monday, for a firm I would significantly prefer to work for. I wasn't entirely sure if I was going to do the scheme, which is why I took so long. Now I definitely need to, as the firm has organised accommodation for me and I have booked travel, and I would really love to train there too.

The issue is, I don't think I'll find out about this second firm until at least early May. I have checked both contracts, and neither actually prohibits me from having already accepted a TC/doing another vac scheme. But I would still feel weird about reneging, and I don't know when they will commit to anything financially with enrolling on the GDL and whatnot.

In hindsight, I probably should have asked for an extension of the offer a while ago, but now that I haven't, I'm wondering if it's best to just accept and renege if I receive the other offer. They've been really bad at responding to emails in the past, so what if they don't get back to me with an extension by Friday, then I would have to accept, and they'd know exactly what I was doing anyway. If they reject the extension, would I then essentially be lying about doing the scheme? I'm leaning towards accept and renege, but that also feels wrong and I'm worried about any financial implications.

Really conflicted on what to do, and any advice would be really appreciated.
 
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock
Hey everyone, long-time watcher, but this is my first post here because I have a bit of a dilemma.

I was very fortunate to be offered a training contract offer from a good city firm a few weeks ago. They gave me a month to accept, which now expires in 1 week, as I've been sitting on it for a while. This is because I also have an upcoming vacation scheme which starts on Monday, for a firm I would significantly prefer to work for. I wasn't entirely sure if I was going to do the scheme, which is why I took so long. Now I definitely need to, as the firm has organised accommodation for me and I have booked travel, and I would really love to train there too.

The issue is, I don't think I'll find out about this second firm until at least early May. I have checked both contracts, and neither actually prohibits me from having already accepted a TC/doing another vac scheme. But I would still feel weird about reneging, and I don't know when they will commit to anything financially with enrolling on the GDL and whatnot.

In hindsight, I probably should have asked for an extension of the offer a while ago, but now that I haven't, I'm wondering if it's best to just accept and renege if I receive the other offer. They've been really bad at responding to emails in the past, so what if they don't get back to me with an extension by Friday, then I would have to accept, and they'd know exactly what I was doing anyway. If they reject the extension, would I then essentially be lying about doing the scheme? I'm leaning towards accept and renege, but that also feels wrong and I'm worried about any financial implications.

Really conflicted on what to do, and any advice would be really appreciated.

Can I recommend you call the city firm GR? If you're worried about them not getting back to your email by Friday, just call them on Monday and explain the situation and ask whether they would be willing to give you a months extension. The worst they can do is say no, which reverts you back to the same position/dilemma, but at least you have tried to exhaust the preferable avenue. You can also explain the situation as you have laid it out here, I'm sure the firm understands as they would've experienced candidates in similar positions before etc.

I don't think reneging is wrong per se, but it definitely is in the 'grey' area in my opinion. If you're willing to take the risk, then by all means (I know some people who have done so), but if you can do it in the proper manner, then that would be what I recommend.

Congratulations on the TC and VS though! Amazing stuff and a great dilemma to have (although perhaps it doesn't feel that way rn lol).
 
Last edited:
Hey guys, I applied to some small boutique law firms a while ago and some of them still haven't gotten back to me yet, would it be okay if I email them inquiring about my application status?
Hey!

Yes, I'd say it is completely fine to send a follow up! As long as you have given it a reasonable amount of time (usually 2-3 weeks, or slightly longer if they gave you a timeline originally), a polite email asking for an update would be appropriate. I don't think it would come across negatively as long as it is framed professionally (+ could even show that you remain interested).

I would keep it quite brief - just reiterate your interest in the firm, mention when you applied, and ask if they are able to provide any update on your application. I'd try to avoid overexplaining!

I hope you hear back soon!! :)
 
Hey everyone, long-time watcher, but this is my first post here because I have a bit of a dilemma.

I was very fortunate to be offered a training contract offer from a good city firm a few weeks ago. They gave me a month to accept, which now expires in 1 week, as I've been sitting on it for a while. This is because I also have an upcoming vacation scheme which starts on Monday, for a firm I would significantly prefer to work for. I wasn't entirely sure if I was going to do the scheme, which is why I took so long. Now I definitely need to, as the firm has organised accommodation for me and I have booked travel, and I would really love to train there too.

The issue is, I don't think I'll find out about this second firm until at least early May. I have checked both contracts, and neither actually prohibits me from having already accepted a TC/doing another vac scheme. But I would still feel weird about reneging, and I don't know when they will commit to anything financially with enrolling on the GDL and whatnot.

In hindsight, I probably should have asked for an extension of the offer a while ago, but now that I haven't, I'm wondering if it's best to just accept and renege if I receive the other offer. They've been really bad at responding to emails in the past, so what if they don't get back to me with an extension by Friday, then I would have to accept, and they'd know exactly what I was doing anyway. If they reject the extension, would I then essentially be lying about doing the scheme? I'm leaning towards accept and renege, but that also feels wrong and I'm worried about any financial implications.

Really conflicted on what to do, and any advice would be really appreciated.
Hey!

Firstly, huge congratulations on the TC offer - that is amazing news!! 🥳 I hope that you celebrate this achievement, even if the situation feels slightly stressful right now.

I would agree with @Bah Bah Pink Sheep and say that your first step should probably be to call the TC firm and ask if they are able to give you an extension until you hear back from the VS firm. Again, there's no guarantee whether they will, but at least you will know either way!

If not, the most practical way to approach it is likely to be to accept the training contract offer and then reassess your position after the vacation scheme. Letting a confirmed TC offer expire for the possibility of another one is a big risk - whilst I'm sure you have a good chance of being offered a TC after the VS (as you are clearly a strong candidate!), there are so many factors that go into those decisions that you never really know for sure.

I completely get why it feels uncomfortable to accept with the thought that you might renege later, but it helps to look at it from a commercial or long-term career perspective. Firms will make decisions in their own best interests all the time, and you are entitled to do the same with your career too. Of course, reneging isn't ideal, but it does happen and most firms will have experienced it before.

In terms of financial risk, I'd say it is usually minimal at this stage. Issues can arise once firms have started funding things like the GDL and SQE (i.e. clawback provisions), so I would definitely double-check your contract. However, if there is likely to be a bit of time between hearing back from the VS firm and starting the GDL, I'd say that you are unlikely to be exposed to anything significant (but definitely check with the firm / contract).

I would give the TC firm a call and see if they are able to extend the deadline, particularly if they are slow to responding to emails (trust me, I hate phone calls more than anyone, so I appreciate this might not be what you want to hear!). If not, I'd accept the TC offer and take part in the VS - you've earned your place there, and if you are really interested in the firm, you should absolutely make the most of the opportunity and aim for a TC offer. After the scheme, you can then make a decision on which firm is the best fit for you (+ the next steps).

Wishing you the best of luck with the scheme, and I hope you hear back from the TC firm soon!! :)
 
Anyone who applied to freeths legal grad job, when you reckon we will hear after doing the online test? Also thoughts on the online test feedback? Idk
I thought the feedback was pretty generic even for a cappfinity test - I also recieved this email on Friday:
Thank you for your application for a place on our Legal Assistant and Legal Graduate Programmes, and for completing our online assessment.

We will review your application nearer to the time of your stated availability, as per your application form, in line with your specified location preferences. At that point we will be in touch again regarding the outcome of your application.

Thank you for your patience and continued interest in Freeths.

With kind regards,

if it is just a holding email its a funky one because I put my graduation date (July) as my notice period but I obviously would want to hear back before then so unsure if I should email or how I'd even word it...
 
I thought the feedback was pretty generic even for a cappfinity test - I also recieved this email on Friday:
Thank you for your application for a place on our Legal Assistant and Legal Graduate Programmes, and for completing our online assessment.

We will review your application nearer to the time of your stated availability, as per your application form, in line with your specified location preferences. At that point we will be in touch again regarding the outcome of your application.

Thank you for your patience and continued interest in Freeths.

With kind regards,

if it is just a holding email its a funky one because I put my graduation date (July) as my notice period but I obviously would want to hear back before then so unsure if I should email or how I'd even word it...
I had the exact same email and I also said my availability began in July
 
  • 🤝
Reactions: TheSaulGoodman
Hi, just wanted to get some opinions on this because I might be overthinking it.

I recently progressed to final stage for a training contract at a firm, and they said the next step is an insight day + final interview sometime in May (date not confirmed yet).

I emailed to say I had a prior personal commitment on 11–12 May but that I’d still prioritise attending. They replied saying thanks and that they’ve noted my availability.

Only issue is i have just realised my commitment actually runs until the 13th. Now I’m debating whether to send a quick follow-up to correct it, or just leave it as is and only mention it if the date ends up being the 13th. Am I overthinking this? Would sending another email be annoying at this stage, or is it better to just clarify now?
 
  • ✅
Reactions: Abbie Whitlock

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.