would love to hear your thoughts on this
@Jaysen
I don't think the position has changed that much for those with weaker grades. But I think it depends on what 'weaker' is here.
Many firms I've spoken to are moving away from application questions as a first filter, largely because they've received a huge increase in lower-quality applications in the last year as a result of AI. I know some firms will have written application questions later in the process, though.
On grades: this is very firm-dependent. I've seen a few firms change their grade policy, but I think for many, they are now just being clearer about the grade requirements on their website. These applicants would probably have been rejected anyway, so it makes sense to be upfront about this.
Online tests are a tricky one and the area I know the least about. A firm needs to have more filters between application and interview because it's very hard to successfully screen thousands of applicants without more data, especially now that AI makes it hard to know if an applicant's writing is their own. But I don't have enough data on how the online tests are factored into the rest of an application or the weight firms place on them.
So, to answer the question, an applicant will generally have an easier time in the process if you have higher grades (a first or high 2:1). But this does not mean that if you
don't have a high 2:1 that you won't get a vacation scheme. I've spoken to many firms that just want you to have an overall 2:1.
The main thing I tell candidates is that it's out of your control at this stage, so you can only concentrate on nailing everything else: meeting firms, writing well in your work experience sections, practising video interviews and online tests, and nailing any written applications that come later in the stages. Often, the applicants with non-standard grades get training contracts because they don't let it decide their chances and they practise performing highly in all the other stages.