TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2026-27

Do firms often require trainees to reimburse them for PGDL/SQE sponsorship if they decide not to stay on with the firm after qualification or decline an NQ offer?
Typically no a firm would not require that, ive not heard of a firm which does - i’ve only seen some firms require you to work for them for a set amount of years upon qualification. It will all be on the firm website/ in an employment contract so you’ll know before you undertake anything legally binding.
 
Hey anybody know when Gibson Dunn, Hogan Lovells, Dechert, Reed Smith, and Mayer Brown send out their tests? I applied on the first day for all of them and haven't received the link to do the test yet.. (well, understandable for Reed Smith as it opened today).

Also, unrelated, but does anyone know if Clifford Chance's direct TC route is a genuine alternative to SPARK for candidates that simply didn't do SPARK, but don't have paralegal experience and other qualifications typically expected of someone who makes a direct TC app?
 
Also any news on when DLA open their app?

Also, Skadden says on their website that "we review candidates on a rolling basis but don't make decisions until after the deadline" - does this basically mean to apply early sort of vibe?

Likewise for Latham - is this rolling does anyone know?
For Skadden this should be viewed as they read applications as they arrive, but they will not hire or reject anyone until the final closing date.

It is essentially a hybrid-non-rolling method to help HR spread the workload out as they sort candidates gradually.
If you submit 3 weeks before the deadline, a recruiter will read it, maybe give it a score, and then put it into a pile, potentially being a benchmark for others applicants to be compared to.

The benefit is that when the deadline is reached, they can quickly book interviews and organise the next stages, rather than spending weeks working through the load.

Latham is non rolling
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ryanmatheson