Hi everyone! I’d really appreciate some advice on applying to certain firms.
I have quite a lot of tech-related experience, including a growth role at an AI financial wellbeing start-up, a vacation scheme in a firm’s Corporate Technology department, and I’m now pursuing an LLM in Law, Technology & Innovation. Naturally, I’ve been thinking about leaning into this in my applications.
I’ve found this relatively easy with a firm like
Orrick, where technology, innovation and emerging companies are clearly central to the firm’s work. However, I’m less sure how to approach a firm like
Gibson Dunn.
My understanding is that
Gibson Dunn is much broader, with a particularly strong focus on areas such as M&A, private equity and complex disputes, rather than being defined by particular sectors. That said, the firm does regularly work with technology companies and has a strong Technology Transactions practice.
Would it be misguided to make my interest in
Gibson Dunn’s work with technology clients part of my “Why
Gibson Dunn?” answer, given my own background? Or should I focus more heavily on the firm’s broader M&A/PE offering and use my tech experience as an additional point of connection rather than the main reason for applying?
I’m conscious of wanting to show a genuine connection to the firm without trying to make it into something it isn’t. Any advice would be really helpful!!