TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2026-27

[anon78365222111]

Just got Winston Taylor tests

 

[AvocadoAtLaw]

Not sure if this is a silly question, but if hsfk send this then send the test does that mean I’ve met the requirements. They did kinda send then test about 30 mins after

Hi!

Not a silly question at all.

I am not absolutely certain but this is probably an automated invite triggered by your submission and after completing the minimum criteria/mitigating circumstances check, and if the minimum criteria is met they would invite you to the next stage, which would be the test. You have probably cleared the automated eligibility criteria on the form for academics, but they read your actual answers after the test.

Based on my application to HSF Kramer last cycle, they will reach out to you again after the test letting you know if you meet the benchmark for the test and then your application would be under review. I hope I have not confused you on the process, hope this helps.

Best of luck with the test!

 

[AvocadoAtLaw]

Hi, does anyone have any tips on structuring a written exercise for Dechert? @Antoni Trochimowicz

Hi!

I am not sure of the specifics so someone else may be better placed to chime in here, I can help with the general side.

I personally had some negative feedback with a written exercise and spend a lot of time working on them.

I would suggest looking at executive summaries for formatting tips and how you would summarise the problem if your written work requires a summary.

Before you start, split the time you have into slots per section and be strict about moving on when a slot runs out. Then leave a comfortable 5 to 7 minutes at the end purely to check spelling and grammar. It feels like time you cannot spare, but a clean document reads as far more competent than a slightly longer one with typos in it.

For the structure itself, I am also linking in some really useful advice that I referred to while doing mine. I would focus on the purpose and issue, relevant background facts, your analysis in two or three points, risks and how they are managed, then a clear recommendation and next steps. Prioritisation is also quite important, so picking the three or four issues that actually matter rather than trying to cover everything.

Good luck with Dechert!

https://www.thecorporatelawacademy....ns-discussion-thread-2025-26.9717/post-243593

https://www.thecorporatelawacademy.com/forum/posts/220349/

https://www.thecorporatelawacademy.com/forum/posts/231327/

 

[aliiiisonxooox]

Just got Winston Taylor tests

Same. Does anyone know if they send the tests to everyone? Or pick people that get the tests?

 

[aliiiisonxooox]

For Winston Taylor , unfortunately I left an important part out. My postgrad degree for a prestigious uni. I couldn’t find the postgrad section and it didn’t let me add more than one uni. I messaged the grad email.. hopefully my application won’t be impacted (

 

[digvijay]

Hey! Would anyone know if Winston Taylor sponsors visas for international applicants to it's vacation scheme?

 

[rose06]

It was 5 months post submission for a DTC interview invite for me

That's crazy... but helpful, thank you!

 

[cutiewiththecontracts]

What might the Dechert written exercise include? Any tips for structuring and writing a good response? @Antoni Trochimowicz

 

[username10341034]

Hi, does anyone have any tips on structuring a written exercise for Dechert? @Antoni Trochimowicz

When did you submit yours?

 

[AvocadoAtLaw]

What might the Dechert written exercise include? Any tips for structuring and writing a good response? @Antoni Trochimowicz

Hey,

I am sure Antoni will get back on this. I am attaching some useful responses on this from before, hopefully this helps till then!

Hi!

I am not sure of the specifics so someone else may be better placed to chime in here, I can help with the general side.

I personally had some negative feedback with a written exercise and spend a lot of time working on them.

I would suggest looking at executive summaries for formatting tips and how you would summarise the problem if your written work requires a summary.

Before you start, split the time you have into slots per section and be strict about moving on when a slot runs out. Then leave a comfortable 5 to 7 minutes at the end purely to check spelling and grammar. It feels like time you cannot spare, but a clean document reads as far more competent than a slightly longer one with typos in it.

For the structure itself, I am also linking in some really useful advice that I referred to while doing mine. I would focus on the purpose and issue, relevant background facts, your analysis in two or three points, risks and how they are managed, then a clear recommendation and next steps. Prioritisation is also quite important, so picking the three or four issues that actually matter rather than trying to cover everything.

Good luck with Dechert!

https://www.thecorporatelawacademy....ns-discussion-thread-2025-26.9717/post-243593

https://www.thecorporatelawacademy.com/forum/posts/220349/

https://www.thecorporatelawacademy.com/forum/posts/231327/

 

[cutiewiththecontracts]

Hi, would anyone who attended the Hogan Lovells event yesterday be willing to share notes? Thank you!

 

[e.jy336]

Does Gibson Dunn's test have a VI component to it