You're very welcomeYou're our hero! Thanks 😁
Amazing! I wish I had this when I was applying, this will be so helpful!Hi all,
As discussed, here's a WG cheat/hint document a friend and I put together which hopefully you will find helpful!
Obviously, feel free to adapt and change it as you see fit so it works best for you.
Good luck!
Dan
You can have a sheet in front of you! The sheets are essentially just a more detailed explanation than you're given in the actual test before each section. This one looks like a great one to use tooBit of a random q but technically is the Watson Glaser meant to be done under exam conditions? as in, are you allowed to have a tip sheet/hint sheet in front of you? I know most do but I'm just double checking just incase it's something that you're not really meant to do
Okay wonderful thank you!!You can have a sheet in front of you! The sheets are essentially just a more detailed explanation than you're given in the actual test before each section. This one looks like a great one to use too
Would highly recommend having your notes/a tip sheet in front of you so that you can apply everything you've picked up from practice to the real test! The only exception to this is if the firm specifically states that you should do the test under exam conditions, which I think is highly unlikely.Bit of a random q but technically is the Watson Glaser meant to be done under exam conditions? as in, are you allowed to have a tip sheet/hint sheet in front of you? I know most do but I'm just double checking just incase it's something that you're not really meant to do
Would highly recommend having your notes/a tip sheet in front of you so that you can apply everything you've picked up from practice to the real test! The only exception to this is if the firm specifically states that you should do the test under exam conditions, which I think is highly unlikely.
Firstly, thanks for doing this, you're a legend.Hi all,
As discussed, here's a WG cheat/hint document a friend and I put together which hopefully you will find helpful!
Obviously, feel free to adapt and change it as you see fit so it works best for you.
Good luck!
Dan
Example:
All Real Estate assets are either very large or located in central areas but not both. While no apartment is without air-conditioning, all air-conditioned Real Estate assets are very large.
Real Estate Assets that are located in central areas are not apartments.
Conclusion follows.
Real-estate assets = A, very large = B, located in a central area = C, apartment = D, air conditioning = E.
According to the premises, (A -> B/C), (no D -> ~E), which means (D -> E), and (A+E -> B).
The conclusion states (A + C -> ~D).
If (A+E -> B), and (D -> E), then (D -> B) (because D is a subgroup of A). And since (A -> B/C), that means every A that is not B but C cannot be D.
In other words:
If all air-conditioned real-estate assets are very large, and all apartments are air conditioned, then all apartments are very large (because apartments are a subgroup of real-estate assets). And since no real-estate asset can be both very large and located in a central area, then this RE asset cannot be very large, as it is in a central area and it cannot be both. As you have concluded that all apartments are very large and this RE asset cannot be very large, then it is not an apartment.