-
TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.Join →
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
- Thread starter Ram Sabaratnam
- Start date
Hey,
I’m honestly the worst person to ask lmao- my score always fluctuates.
One thing I can say is to make sure you remember the firm’s values, and answer according to that. I know they say to answer honestly but I realised that this method doesn’t work (for me at least). HD are big on creativity so I kept that in mind, and scored 9/9.
I did Mishcon amberjack not so long ago and got 3/9 in creative force lmao. Think I focused too much on being a collaborative person and didn’t display my own initiative etc!
Hope that helps x
does anyone have a list of firms that dont use amberjack? or the Taylor wessing/eversheds type test? im getting tired of these... I almost miss the Watson Glaser.
may i ask when did you apply and when did you hear back? and for vs or tc? Congrats!
Hi!
This kind of question is usually much broader than it looks, so I'd try not to overthink it! It doesn't have to be directly tied to the firm's core practice areas (e.g. life sciences). Firms use questions like this in order to get a sense of how you think, what you're curious about, and how you reflect - they're not necessarily testing any commercial awareness or technical knowledge.
I would make sure that, whatever event you choose, it allows you to:
- Explain why it genuinely interests you
- Show how you analyse or reflect on significance and impact
- Subtly reveal qualities and traits relevant to being a trainee (e.g. curiosity, judgement, perspective, learning mindset)
The way that I would potentially structure it is as follows:
- Pick an event that you genuinely find interesting (this can be historical, current, or future-facing!)
- Explain why witnessing it firsthand would matter to you - it might be helpful to frame this in terms of what you'd be looking to learn or understand
- Link that insight back to how you approach learning, decision-making, working with people, etc.
If you can naturally connect it to the firm's work or values, that can be a bonus - however, I would avoid forcing a link as it could read as inauthentic.
Overall, anything at all should be fine - just as long as your reasoning is strong and reflective! In these types of questions, the "why" matters far more than the event itself.
I hope that helps!
the goodwin VI is really not that bad tbh. it's fairly standard motivational/competency questions you should prep anyway
You’re gna have a stampede of people rushing to msg you now for “insights” into Goodwin’s VI like:
I’m about to be one of them 😂😂😂You’re gna have a stampede of people rushing to msg you for “insights” into Goodwin’s VI now like:
That is actually really reassuring, I do not like VIs at all! If you don't mind me asking, are there any commercial questions? I am prepping those just in case. Thanks in advance!
Other firms with Watson Glaser/Critical Thinking Test (Apps still open):
Milbank
Cooley
Cleary Gottlieb
Addleshaw Goddard
I've made a list for Amberjack before on this thread, worth check it out.
Other firms use Cappfin and SHL (Ashurst, Osborne Clarke, etc). The rest are quite direct either with written exercise or interview.
OC's test was designed to cook aspiring solicitors full of energy and dreams.
White & Case VI was absolutely criminal. I prepped so well and had no idea that the prep time was like 15 seconds lol, it completely threw me off. I spent like half of the response time for one of the questions just reading the question because I didn't even get a chance to fully register it lol
I dont understand why firms dont make whether they are rolling or not clear enough...
That’d be extra work for grad rec and they prefer to keep things rly ambiguous. They probs read these forums and see our daily crash-outs over whether they’re rolling or non-rolling and be like:
Last edited:
Do law firms deduct points in VI if you discuss a point that is not relevant to the question even if your first point is really strong. Say your first point is really strong then your second point is not related to the question. Hope that makes sense.
Similar threads
- Sticky
