It read like it was a filter at WE stage (and possibly also at critical thinking test stage) but I don't know for sure. I think VI might have been automaticWere the stages automatic? or based on how well you did previously?
It read like it was a filter at WE stage (and possibly also at critical thinking test stage) but I don't know for sure. I think VI might have been automaticWere the stages automatic? or based on how well you did previously?
I personally wouldn't say that. It's not exactly aligned with an intensely pressurised and stressful profession. I think that section is for things like sudden death of a parent/hit by a bus and in traction scenarios.Hi! Would really appreciate advice regarding how to present mitigating circumstances. Can anyone suggest how to present a one-off moment of anxiety/panic before an exam that impacted the grade leading me to retake that specific exam? I have never had to retake any other exam otherwise. Would this situation be looked down upon?
I would disagree, I’ve mentioned anxiety in the mitigating circumstances section before, and still progressed to AC/next stages - if it’s something that genuinely has impacted your academic performance, you can include it - I don’t think firms are necessarily allowed to link contextual information to whether you’re ’aligned’ with the profession (your application answers should be determining that). Also the examples you gave were slightly extreme, mitigating circumstances are more broad imoI personally wouldn't say that. It's not exactly aligned with an intensely pressurised and stressful profession. I think that section is for things like sudden death of a parent/hit by a bus and in traction scenarios.
well yes clearly I was being a little flippant but I still think its probably better to avoid. Im no expert though.I would disagree, I’ve mentioned anxiety in the mitigating circumstances section before, and still progressed to AC/next stages - if it’s something that genuinely has impacted your academic performance, you can include it - I don’t think firms are necessarily allowed to link contextual information to whether you’re ’aligned’ with the profession (your application answers should be determining that). Also the examples you gave were slightly extreme, mitigating circumstances are more broad imo
Thank you for going the extra mile! This is extremely helpfulI have checked this with a lawyer and they have said that this is correct. You don't need to do the PGDL, you simply need to pass SQE and then apply for NQ positions (as long as your QWE is signed off as valid).
yesDoes everyone get invited to shoosmith online assessment?
Hey!Hi! Would really appreciate advice regarding how to present mitigating circumstances. Can anyone suggest how to present a one-off moment of anxiety/panic before an exam that impacted the grade leading me to retake that specific exam? I have never had to retake any other exam otherwise. Would this situation be looked down upon?
considering no one seems to have heard back I would say go for it.Just realised I never completed the mitigating circumstances portion on the Linklaters application - I completed it back in November so idk if its worth contacting grad rec about it